DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES

Scottish independence? Dont make me laugh

2012-01-25T10:02:00.000-08:00

According to the fraudster above, the vote on whether or not Scotland should stay in the UK is 'the most important decision by the people of Scotland in 300 years'

I beg to differ. I would say it is the biggest FRAUD against the people of Scotland in 1000 YEARS.

Salmond, pretends scottish 'independence' would somehow benefit the people of Scotland, and he postures as all politicians do, that he cares, that he has the interests of the Scottish people at heart, and yet he lies, as all politicians do.

The real force behind this ludicrous plan is the hidden hand of the EU, the 'democratic' entity that we, the people, have no say about, the globalist dictatorship that now, thanks to decades of phony politicians, has come to dominate our laws, our rules, our lives.

For this diabolical entity to have complete control, which it soon will have, countries as we know them have to be dismantled. 'eurozones' have to be created. The UK will be divided into 'regions', not counties, areas have to be separated in controllable 'zones' where people can be more easily managed and controlled, it makes humanity far more maleable to the euro-fanatics dream of a european 'superstate'

Separation is the key to this orwellian goal. Without separation (England,Wales, Scotland, NI,etc) it cannot be achieved, and this illusion, for that is what it is, of 'Independence' is a hoax, a fraud, whatever you want to call it, for ultimately it gives Scotland nothing of the sort.

No nation can ever be 'independent' all the time the puppeteers of the EU are pulling the strings, and believe me, they are here to stay.

N.H.

THE 'POST-DEMOCRATIC' SOCIETY ...... UNFOLDING BY THE HOUR

2011-12-04T14:07:00.000-08:00

We are witnesses to a bankers' coup on country after country in the biggest transfer of wealth and political power from people to a tiny elite in known human history. It began with the Illuminati-engineered collapse of the banking system in September 2008. This banking crisis became a government crisis when Illuminati-controlled governments bailed out the banks and became swamped in catastrophic levels of debt.
In came the Illuminati created-and-controlled IMF and European Central Bank to 'bail out' governments which included the insistence on austerity programmes for the population, selling off state assets to Illuminati corporations at knock-down prices and now increasingly appointing bankers to become unelected political leaders of allegedly 'democratic' countries.
'Coup' is the only word to describe it - 'a sudden appropriation of leadership or power; a takeover'.
The criminal that is Jose Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, oversaw the collapse of European economies and now says that the only way to 'fight' the crisis is for a massive centralised superstate - exactly what the 'European project' was designed to be from the very start. Jean Monnet, the Rothschild frontman and 'Founding Father' of what has become the EU, wrote in a letter to a friend on 30th April, 1952:
'Europe's nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.'
That is precisely what has happened and is still happening.

David Icke Newsletter Preview

Its only ever 'racial' if the victim is black

2011-12-04T12:57:00.000-08:00

Yesterday at 6:50 pm yet another young life was brutally ended.

London, the nations capital and a seething hotbed of hate and turmoil, caused by ludicrous and unworkable liberal policies,has become an epicentre for racial friction and death.

This young man was chased by a group of 'youths' (BBC code for young blacks) he then had his throat slashed outside his own mothers front door, were he then died thirty minutes later. BBC radio completely ignored this murder all this morning, and when they did finally acknowledge the fact it had happened they reported it without any mention of the ethnicity of the attackers.

If a Black male had been murdered after being chased by a group of White males the killing would be the main news item for days. A-la 'Stephen Lawrence'. However since in this case the roles have been reversed; do not expect any far-left groups or trade unions to hold candlelight vigils, nor MP's or senior Police Officers to visit the scene of this tragedy. On the contrary the establishment will do its damn best to ensure that this incident disappears into the Orwellian memory hole!

R.I.P

EUSSR: Banker Coup: Goldman Sachs Takes Over Europe

2011-11-14T22:41:00.001-08:00

Financial terrorists who caused collapse pose as EU debt crisis saviors

Precisely as we warned all along, the very financial terrorists responsible for the economic collapse have now exploited the crisis to pose as saviors and oversee a banker coup – with Goldman Sachs stooges now in control of both Italy and the European Central Bank.

The objective of the coup is to exploit the euro debt crisis as a vehicle through which to create a European federal superstate that will transfer all remaining control over national affairs to Brussels. The globalists have already started the process, hand-picking two unelected stooges to replace democratically elected Prime Ministers in Greece and Italy.

Silvio Berlusconi was the Colonel Gaddafi of Europe. Despite his personally loathsome character, Berlusconi was proving to be an obstacle for the banker coup and was hastily dismissed, not by the will of the people, but as Time’s Stephen Faris explains, by an action of insiders who control the markets.

“On Monday, investors seemed to make the collective decision that he could no longer be trusted at the helm of the euro zone’s third largest economy and sent Italy’s cost of borrowing up towards crisis levels. By the end of the week, not only was Berlusconi finished, so was the very idea of holding a vote to replace him. The markets had spoken, and they didn’t like the idea of going to the electorate. “The country needs reforms, not elections,” said Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council on a visit to Rome Friday.”

Berlusconi’s replacement is the ultimate globalist stooge, former EU Commissioner Mario Monti, an international advisor for Goldman Sachs, the European Chairman of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission and also a leading member of the Bilderberg Group. Monti is a safe pair of hands for the next stage of the banker coup, when the euro crisis will be hijacked to concentrate even more power into the hands of the very people who caused it in the first place.

“This is the band of criminals who brought us this financial disaster. It is like asking arsonists to put out the fire,” commented Alessandro Sallusti, editor of Il Giornale, a Milan newspaper owned by the Berlusconi family.

Similarly, when Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou dared to suggest the people of Greece be allowed to have their say in a referendum, within days he was dispatched and replaced with Lucas Papademos, former vice-President of the ECB, visiting Harvard Professor and ex-senior economist at the Boston Federal Reserve.

Papademos and Monti have been installed as unelected leaders for the precise reason that they “aren’t directly accountable to the public,” notes Faris, once again illustrating the fundamentally dictatorial and undemocratic foundation of the entire European Union.

On Friday, we also highlighted how the onslaught of doomsday rhetoric about the collapse of the eurozone could just be another ruse to concentrate more power into the hands of the EU in its bid to to create a centralized European economic government that would dictate decisions to all member states.

Low and behold, the European Central Bank is now being hailed as the entity to “save the eurozone” by bailing out Italy, France and Spain.

And who has just been installed as President of the European Central Bank and billed as the“savior of Europe”? None other than Mario Draghi – former Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs International. Starting to notice a trend?

Of course, the strings attached to this bailout will accomplish precisely what the Eurocrats wanted all along, a closer-knit “political union” as German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for yesterday, or in other words a federal superstate that will eviscerate what remaining independence and sovereignty European nation states have left and hand it all over to Brussels.

The entire EU debt crisis is nothing less than a flagrant banker coup d’état designed to empower the same financial terrorists who caused the initial collapse in 2008 by suddenly withdrawing huge amounts of credit from the market.

The crooks who popped the bubble in the first place are now setting themselves up as the heroes who will ride to the rescue to prevent worldwide depression – at the cost of European nation states surrendering control over their economies to unelected EU dictators like Herman Van Rompuy and José Manuel Barroso.

www.prisonplanet.com

A Healer's Description of the Illuminati

2011-11-10T10:50:00.000-08:00

From Henry Makow

November 9, 2011

The movie, Devil's Advocate,
expounded the Illuminati's
Luciferian vision.

Yes, Satan is a real entity. Demons are organized and he is the leader. He is a spirit. I personally know 3 people that have had the same experience of being offered fame and fortune if they would go over to his side.

by Mendel
(henrymakow.com)

Many people are mistaken that Illuminati or Satanists are mediocre and seek an unfair advantage by betraying society. The Illuminati actively seek out and recruit the gifted, especially those with spiritual gifts.

Typically, they will approach the talented with offers of fame and fortune and promises of high rank within their organization.

Satan himself has been known to personally make his offer to certain individuals. He does not have horns or a pointy tail. He is handsome, incredibly intelligent and charming. Like Al Pacino in Devil's Advocate. Nevertheless he is the father of all lies.

Yes, Satan is a real entity. Demons are organized and he is the leader. He is a spirit. I personally know 3 people that have had the same experience of being offered fame and fortune if they would go over to his side. These 3 individuals are not acquainted.

Similarly, the New Testament records that Jesus had been approached by Satan and offered the kingdoms of the world, if he would bow and worship him. Jesus also alludes that they are organized with the statement "a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand".

This is a real experience, few ever speak of it.

They carefully place their intellectuals within universities. I have discovered them teaching not to educate, but to discredit morality and religion. They mislead youth by covering up or even falsifying science.

Some towns are dominated by Satanists; they are in city halls, police and fire departments. They are placed in the highest offices of politics, courtrooms and law practices from coast to coast.

They are in our churches. Even some well known evangelists are involved, where they teach guilt and dogmatism rather than love and forgiveness.

They are in the helping professions such as medicine and psychology. They are not there to help. They are there to milk people of all the money they can. They will connive to close down any MD that discovers cheap or easy cures or any psychologist that speaks out against homosexuality or ritual abuse.

In my experience, the tool they use is ridicule and shame to detour people from truth. However, they fear exposure and if I suspect them and allude to it, they quickly back away.
THEY ENVY AND HATE EACH OTHER

Having worked with several escaped Satanists, I can tell you that the Illuminati and Satanism are not based upon trust, but upon the fear of exposure of crimes they have participated in. None trust each other. In fact members generally envy and hate each other.

Generational Satanists ritually sexually abuse their own young children. These events are filmed. Should the perp step out of line, these films will be used to blackmail them.

When a certain governor endorsed a presidential candidate that was not the Illuminati's choice, his use of expensive prostitutes was exposed in the national press. His life and career were deservedly ruined. The press were well aware of his proclivities for some time.

Should they be found out by honest law enforcement and still are in good standing, corrupt law enforcement will drop the charges as in the Aquino abuse and pedophilia case.

Today you can't get anywhere in politics unless they have dirt on you, in order to keep you under control. If you are not one of them, you will not get publicity. You may even find yourself in prison under false charges.
The Illuminati could not have gotten where they are today without the help of their worldwide minions in the press

When their Babylonian economic system fails (which is very soon) they will be the first at each others throats. They may even instigate World War III as high ranking members are in the U.S., Chinese and Russian governments.

Therefore I suggest that all of you prepare quickly. Get enough food for your loved ones to last a year or more. We that refuse to lift the sword against our brothers will have to separate ourselves physically from the ensuring chaos for our mutual benefit and survival.

LOW LEVEL SATANISTS AND USE OF DEMONS

Witches and sorcerers are the lowest level within Satanism. They believe they have learned to harness demons to create havoc and receive gain.

But really it is the other way around. Their demons can confuse or enrage people to the point that they do savage acts or even commit suicide.

Demons can posses us if we allow them. Attempted possession usually happens when you choose to make a major positive change in your life. The demons want to stop your progress at all cost. There is absolutely no self doubt when you are attacked. It is like a train wreck, and will make a believer out of the staunchest atheist.

Demons can operate on the physical plane. They can make things go bump in the night. They can cause physical injury such as bites, bruises, cuts and can even cause illness. They come in different sizes, shapes and strengths. A powerful one can literally cause a stone building to shake to its foundations.

But demons have power over us only if we allow them. We allow them by feeding them with our own fear, guilt, shame, rage, greed, lust, or hunger for power; though we may not always be conscious of it.

To those rare few that can see them, most demons are hideous and deformed non-human entities. Through Hollywood, (Satan's propaganda machine), our culture is now reflecting the same ugliness in our entertainment and arts.

Vulgar TV programs, rap or rock music, arguments and fighting also attract them into our own homes.

Even Christian rock music will attract them. They are attracted to the ugliness of the music; it's not necessarily the lyrics that bring or repel them.

The use of mind altering drugs and alcohol debilitates us and enables them to gain control over us. This is why so many heinous crimes are committed while under the influence.

Promiscuity will open us up to their influences in addition to adding and sharing the "Karmic' burden of each sexual partner. That is why the promiscuous heap huge problems into their lives, suffer multiple health and emotional problems and age faster than the rest of us.

Getting rid of demons is not that difficult. Firmly invoking the name of, God or Christ can send them away. But if you do so with fear or anger they stay and laugh at you. They feed off of your fear or rage and become stronger.

Those that carefully repent and live upright lives are protected by being free of the guilt associated with sin.

--
Today-

Two Wisconsin Women Charged in Satanic Sex Ritual

THE LAST NIGHT OF THE PROMS

2011-09-10T14:55:00.000-07:00

What a truly great event, the sense of pride and patriotism is almost palpable, and I cannot help feeling that deep down the rabid liberals of the BBC must HATE this event with a vengence.

Patriotism and true BRITISHNESS, as well as an almost complete lack of black faces either in the audience or the crowds goes completely against their vile program of social engineering that masquerades as 'entertainment'

The last night of the proms,long may it continue, and to hell with the BBC.

British 'Justice'

2011-09-10T08:30:00.000-07:00

Our prison system is currently at breaking point with record numbers of criminals languishing in the holiday camps we laughably call 'prisons' What does this tell anyone who wonders why this useless system does not work?

Just a cursory glance over the controlled print media today tells one all one needs to know about the appalling state of this countries criminal justice system.

Remember the recent stories about people caught carrying knives would recieve a mandatory 5 years? LIES.
Today we learn that over 90% of 'youths in Scotland caught carrying weapons escape justice.

We also read today that record numbers of perverts have 'breached their terms of release' and are roaming free to prey on the next innocent victim.

The liberal establishment does not believe in punishment, it pretends the evil and lawless are 'victims' that require 'treatment', not punishment, and consequently the prisons are full to bursting and criminal activity is rife.

The sicko pictured above is what the state call a 'serial offender' i.e. someone so sick and depraved he cannot help himself abuse and rape, yet the system allows this twisted fucker to be released through a 'court order' to limit his movements. He is deemed by this ludicrous system 'a significant risk to the public' yet is essentially free.

Why? This is just one case of what must be thousands, yet NOTHING is being done to rectify the situation, we as citizens are supposed to just accept this madness and say nothing, to allow our lives to potentially be blighted by the lawless scum that the system tolerates, to keep paying our taxes and put up with it.

THE LUNATICS ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM

GQ's 'Politician of the year'.....

2011-09-07T00:09:00.000-07:00

Just look (if you can bear it) at this contemptible creature. There he stands clutching his 'award' as one of GQ's 'Men of the year' vacant eyes, smug, self satisfied almost manic grin on his face, being awarded for lying through his teeth to the people of Great Britain.

Anybody who cannot see through this 'austerity' charade does not deserve to draw breath, as it is a lie so hollow, so transparent, so completely unbelievable it is an insult to our intelligence.

He talks of a 'Great contraction' and of course he is right, but it is wholly deliberate. The astronomical rise in the price of just about everything, plus the 'governments' ability to steal 20% of our money everytime we make a transaction through the legalised robbery 'VAT' means many many people are finding it very difficult to make ends meet (thats if they still have a job at all).

But hang on. Why are these 'austerity' measures not affecting the perpetual and disgusting travesty the liars call 'foreign aid'? How do we still have the funds for the illegal occupation of other countries under the guise of 'anti terrorism'? (Libya is costing over 1000 pounds a MINUTE to the UK taxpayer), the benefits bill for the millions of immigrants brought here by the globalists runs into hundred of millions, the list goes on...

So while the British public scrimp and save, many too scared to put the heating on or even buy quality food, whilst we watch our jobs vanish before us, while we find our quality of life and sense of well being disappear in a haze of debt and worry, this fucking Bullingdon club toff stands before us collecting an award for his part in the dismantling of a nation.

God help us.

N.H.

William 'puppet' Hague

2011-08-30T12:31:00.000-07:00

Just how stupid does this idiot think we all are? Every day the controlled media let this oaf trot out his latest little speech all about the 'Transitional government' and the Libyan 'rebels' clearly expecting people to believe without question the bullshit that spews from his mouth.

Well i've got news for you Hague, you pointless little Rothschild lackey, many, many people do NOT believe you, or a word your posturing 'conservative' government tells us.

Study the comments pages on the newspaper websites, news forums, and the wealth of other blogs and sites that deal with FACTS and not globalist LIES about humanitarian issues and other such ludicrous bullcrap and you will see that millions of decent folk can see right through your smokescreen of zionist LIES, and know damn well that it is what Libya has to offer that the grasping parasites in control of the globe want access too, so they can plunder it whilst instilling 'democracy' and regime change, and when that objective is complete, its on to the next country that can be obliterated and plundered, Syria........

Hell is waiting for you Hague, along with the rest of your lying grasping heartless rabble.

R.I.P Mac

2011-08-28T09:24:00.000-07:00

This guy to me was a true hero. A no-nonsense warrior with gonads the size of medicine balls.

To hear he has died is a tragedy, even more so because of the loss of his son in the utterly pointless 'war' in Afghanistan, something he apparently never got over.

Folk like this simply dont exist anymore in modern Britain, they are a dying breed, and everytime another of this countries true heroes dies, we lose a little more of what once went together to make this nation great.

John McAleese had more moral fibre and honour in his little toe than all the fucking 'politicians' in this country put together, and his passing is a sad,sad loss to us all.

Disaster capitalism swoops over Libya

2011-08-27T14:01:00.000-07:00

Think of the new Libya as the latest spectacular chapter in the Disaster Capitalism series. Instead of weapons of mass destruction, we had R2P, short for "responsibility to protect". Instead of neo-conservatives, we had humanitarian imperialists.
Voltaire Network | 25 August 2011

Missiles launched against Gaddafi forces from NATO warships.

But the target is the same: regime change. And the project is the same: to completely dismantle and privatize a nation that was not integrated into turbo-capitalism; to open another (profitable) land of opportunity for turbocharged neo-liberalism. The whole thing is especially handy because it is smack in the middle of a nearly global recession.

It will take some time; Libyan oil won’t totally return to the market within 18 months. But there’s the reconstruction of everything the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) bombed (well, not much of what the Pentagon bombed in 2003 was reconstructed in Iraq ...).

Anyway - from oil to rebuilding - in thesis juicy business opportunities loom. France’s neo-Napoleonic Nicolas Sarkozy and Britain’s David of Arabia Cameron believe they will be especially well positioned to profit from NATO’s victory. Yet there’s no guarantee the new Libyan bonanza will be enough to lift both former colonial powers (neo-colonials?) out of recession.

President Sarkozy in particular will milk the business opportunities for French companies for all they’re worth - part of his ambitious agenda of "strategic redeployment" of France in the Arab world. A compliant French media are gloating that this was "his" war - spinning that he decided to arm the rebels on the ground with French weaponry, in close cooperation with Qatar, including a key rebel commando unit that went by sea from Misrata to Tripoli last Saturday, at the start of "Operation Siren".

Well, he certainly saw the opening when Muammar Gaddafi’s chief of protocol defected to Paris in October 2010. That’s when the whole regime change drama started to be incubated.

Bombs for oil

As previously noted (see "Welcome to Libya’s ’democracy’", Asia Times Online, August 24) the vultures are already circling Tripoli to grab (and monopolize) the spoils. And yes - most of the action has to do with oil deals, as in this stark assertion by Abdeljalil Mayouf, information manager at the "rebel" Arabian Gulf Oil Company: "We don’t have a problem with Western countries like the Italians, French and UK companies. But we may have some political issues with Russia, China and Brazil."

These three happen to be crucial members of the BRICS group of emerging economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), which are actually growing while the Atlanticist, NATO-bombing economies are either stuck in stagnation or recession. The top four BRICs also happen to have abstained from approving UN Security Council resolution 1973, the no-fly zone scam that metamorphosed into NATO bringing regime change from above. They saw right through it from the beginning.

To make matters worse (for them), only three days before the Pentagon’s Africom launched its first 150-plus Tomahawks over Libya, Colonel Gaddafi gave an interview to German TV stressing that if the country were attacked, all energy contracts would be transferred to Russian, Indian and Chinese companies.

So the winners in the oil bonanza are already designated: NATO members plus Arab monarchies. Among the companies involved, British Petroleum (BP), France’s Total and the Qatar national oil company. For Qatar - which dispatched jet fighters and recruiters to the front lines, trained "rebels" in exhaustive combat techniques, and is already managing oil sales in eastern Libya - the war will reveal itself to be a very wise investment decision.

Prior to the months-long crisis that is in its end game now with the rebels in the capital, Tripoli, Libya was producing 1.6 million barrels per day. Once resumed, this could reap Tripoli’s new rulers some US$50 billion annually. Most estimates place oil reserves at 46.4 billion barrels.

The "rebels" of new Libya better not mess with China. Five months ago, China’s official policy was all ready to call for a ceasefire; if that had happened, Gaddafi would still control more than half of Libya. Yet Beijing - never a fan of violent regime change - for the moment is exercising extreme restraint.

War pigs-the scum that have decemated Libya on their 'humanitarian' mission

2011-08-27T13:34:00.000-07:00

Libya R.I.P. ... The Rothschilds Own You Now

2011-08-27T13:22:00.000-07:00

Source-David Icke

Gaddafi was being demonised by the Reagan-Father Bush administration (the Rothschilds) in the 1980s when the CIA and Mossad led a campaign to destabilise Libya that mirrors what has happened in 2011. Newsweek reported on August 3rd, 1981:
'The details of the plan were sketchy, but it seemed to be a classic CIA destabilization campaign. One element was a "disinformation" program designed to embarrass Kaddafi and his government. Another was the creation of a "counter government" to challenge his claim to national leadership. A third - potentially the most risky - was an escalating paramilitary campaign, probably by disaffected Libyan nationals, to blow up bridges, conduct small-scale guerrilla operations and demonstrate that Kaddafi was opposed by an indigenous political force.'
Sound familiar? That was 30 years ago.
But so many just buy the lie no matter what the era or generation. As Adolf Hitler said: 'Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.' And his propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, said: 'The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Hitler also said, with equal relevance: 'What luck for the rulers that men do not think.'
NATO planes pepper-bombed Tripoli in support of the 'rebels' on the ground. Thousands of the very civilians that the UN resolution said should be protected were killed in the process. But we hear nothing of this in the mainstream media and precious little of the murder and executions of Gaddafi supporters by the 'rebels' throughout the conflict and after they entered Tripoli.
The emphasis is always on alleged executions and killings of rebel supporters by Gaddafi's forces. No doubt some of these claims are true, but where is the balance? There is none, and Syria is now being demonised to go through the same process of demonise, invade, conquer, control. Richard Haas, president of the Illuminati Council on Foreign Relations which directs US foreign policy, has admitted that the NATO bombing of Libya was not about protecting civilians, but removing Gaddafi. He also called for an 'international force' to occupy the country and 'maintain order'.
It is the same rhetoric, the same blueprint, which we have seen in every other country 'liberated' by the architects of tyranny. It really is goodbye Libya: rest in peace. The United States and its conscripted NATO allies are not going to walk away and leave Libya to the Libyans. It is an occupation force to pillage the oil resources and the banking system, and it was always going to be.

Jerusalem rabbis 'condemn dog to death by stoning'

2011-06-18T06:05:00.000-07:00

In traditional Judaism, dogs are considered to be impure animals A Jewish rabbinical court condemned to death by stoning a stray dog it feared was the reincarnation of a lawyer who insulted its judges, reports say.

The dog entered the Jerusalem financial court several weeks ago and would not leave, reports Israeli website Ynet.

It reminded a judge of a curse passed on a now deceased secular lawyer about 20 years ago, when judges bid his spirit to enter the body of a dog.

The animal is said to have escaped before the sentence was carried out.

One of the judges at the court in the city's ultra-Orthodox Mea Shearim neighbourhood had reportedly asked local children to carry out the sentence.

An animal welfare organisation filed a complaint with the police against a court official, who denied reports that judges had ordered the dog's stoning, according to Ynet.

But a court manager told Israeli daily Yediot Aharonot the stoning had been ordered as "as an appropriate way to 'get back at' the spirit which entered the poor dog", according to Ynet.

Dogs are considered impure animals in traditional Judaism.

The dishonourable traitors

2011-06-18T05:30:00.000-07:00

Those of us who study the demise of the 'west' fully understand the manipulation and social engineering that is/has taken place, and the real reasons for it. It is clear to see that the destruction of the middle classes is essential if the ruling elite are to implement their satanic domination of humanity, that society will consist of an 'upper class' (the ruling elite) and a lower class of maleable sheep, an easily controlled population of mongrels devoid of national identity or belonging, and completely financially dependent on the state for their very survival.

Daily we are bombarded by media stories telling us of the latest blow against the middle classes, constantly reinforcing their belief that the middle classes MUST be made to suffer whilst the 'upper class' appear to escape almost scott free from these measures all of course in the name of 'austerity'.

A thought occured to me today that ultimately demonstrates the utter evil of Cameron and his cohorts, and takes some understanding to any person of sane and rational thought. This 'government' is nothing but a sham, we all know that, these carefully chosen characters are mere puppets, public mouthpieces who trot out everything their masters require of them as if these sentiments and idea's were their own. That in itself requires a special sort of person, someone without conviction, someone who is devoid of moral fibre, someone who is utterly dishonourable, and is prepared to 'live a lie' on a daily basis FOR YEARS.

Cameron and Clegg are nothing but professional liars. They make their living from not only lying but also from pretending to be something they are not, doing as they are told and betraying each and every citizen of our country ON A DAILY BASIS. What kind of an individual could possibly even live with themselves carrying this sort of burden? These people are utterly without merit, they lack empathy,compassion, self belief, the list goes on, their disgraceful behaviour exposes them for what they are-LIARS.

To anybody who still goes along with this charade termed 'democracy' I would say this.
Dont believe A WORD that eminates from the lips of these abominable excuses for humanity.Treat them with the contempt they so richly deserve, take no notice of the bilge that is beamed into your living room via the TV under the guise of 'News' turn your backs on the controlled media and understand how this system of EVIL surrounds us all and is rapidly shaping our demise not only finacially, but more importantly SPIRITUALLY, how good and right have been replaced by wrong and evil, how we are being crushed by a system that seeks to DESTROY US whilst simultaniously ENSLAVING US UNDER EVIL.

Many people have said to me over the years that nothing makes any sense anymore, and I agree with them. It makes no sense because it is WRONG, and no matter how the vermin in Westminster dress up their ludicrous plans decent people will not be fooled. We as a nation are destitute courtesy of the banking cabals that feed from us like gorged parasites, the same parasites that our 'government' chose to 'bail out' whilst turning their backs on the thousands of worthy causes that require assistance yet will never see any.Yet every week Cameron pledges hundreds of millions to countries oversea's who require 'aid'. Hundreds of libraries across the country are closing because of a lack of funding, yet as if by magic we have 830 MILLION to vaccinate children in the laughably termed 'developing nations'. When did sub-saharan Africa last 'develop'?

The ever widening gulf between income and the cost of living is completely DELIBERATE as the zionists seek to level the playing field between the West and the East, and the whole sorry episode is built on a TISSUE OF LIES perpetuated by our mass media, and the utterly despicable scum who purport to represent us whilst stabbing each and every one of us in the back.

Their actions will have consequences, consequences the evil that drives them keeps shielded from them, ultimately they will be punished and suffer for their deeds, but not before they have turned all of humanity into a melting pot of hatred and turmoil.
Dont fall for it, embrace what is good and right and cast the likes of Cameron and Clegg into the ether, they will pay, have no doubt.

Dam Busters dog renamed for movie remake

2011-06-11T03:48:00.000-07:00

Why can we not say nigger anymore? Why must it be referred to as the 'N-word'? Why must we put up with this PC bullshit?

I am surprised the Guy Gibson character isnt being played by a black actor, and how many of the crew will appear as 'mixed race' in a bid to appease the ludicrous liberal elite who seem hell bent on re-writing history to suit their twisted anti-white agenda.

The black Labrador CALLED NIGGER was run over and killed during the planning of the raids

The Dam Busters' dog will be renamed for a new version of the classic war movie, it has emerged.

Stephen Fry, who is writing the film's screenplay, said there was "no question in America that you could ever have a dog called the N-word".

In the remake, the dog will be called "Digger" instead of "Nigger".

The black Labrador was the mascot for RAF 617 squadron, which during World War II destroyed dams in Germany with Barnes Wallis's famous bouncing bomb.

Owned by the squadron's wing commander, Guy Gibson, the animal was run over and killed during the planning of the Dambuster raids, and was buried at RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire - from where the operation was launched.

Stephen Fry told BBC Radio 5 Live: "It's no good saying that it is the Latin word for black or that it didn't have the meaning that it does now - you just can't go back, which is unfortunate.

"You can go to RAF Scampton and see the dog's grave and there he is with his name, and it's an important part of the film.

"The name of the dog was a code word to show that the dam had been successfully breached.

"In the film, you're constantly hearing 'N-word, N-word, N-word, hurray' and Barnes Wallis is punching the air. But obviously that's not going to happen now.

"So Digger seems OK, I reckon."

Phil Bonner, from Lincolnshire Aviation Heritage Centre, a privately run Bomber Command museum, said: "I think for the Second World War generation that word was acceptable - but with my daughters growing up in Lincolnshire - they have been taught that the word is unacceptable now.

"The film is not about the dog - my big concern would be if they watered down what the Dam Busters had achieved."

The 1955 film, which starred Sir Michael Redgrave and Richard Todd, told the story of Barnes Wallis' struggle to develop the bomb and the subsequent raids on Nazi Germany - codenamed Operation Chastise.

The remake is being produced by Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson.

Israel Created Hamas to Avoid Peace

2011-06-11T03:35:00.001-07:00

HENRY MAKOW.COM

June 9, 2011

Israel created Hamas as an excuse to wage war on the Palestinians. For example, on May 18, a Hamas MP said all Israelis must be annihilated. This is a perfect excuse for Zionists and their supporters to forestall the peace process. This report suggests the Hamas MP could easily work for Israel.

by David Livingstone

(abridged by henrymakow.com)

The Israelis created Hamas. But before we explore why, let's be clear that Israel does not want peace. They want all of Palestine, and their belligerent settlement practices confirm that.

But the Israelis are taking advantage of the world's ignorance of the realities in Palestine, and posturing as being willing to talk "peace", only to actually stall that very peace process, so as not to interrupt the further colonization of Palestine.

So anything that can be offered as an excuse, will be. The most convenient ploy, presented with the sycophantic assistance of the media, is that of "terrorism".

But the masses are naive, and fail to suspect the Machiavellian extremes that certain leaders will resort to. This includes creating a false enemy, in this case, Hamas, whereby the right-wing leadership of the Israelis can point the finger to some "enemy" to blame for supposedly stalling the process.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The West's sponsorship of Islamic terrorism is nothing new. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1924, the British and Americans filled the vacuum by providing their own versions of "Islamic" leaders. This started with the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood through a grant from the British. Under British sponsorship, the Brotherhood today represents a powerful force in the Islamic world, and is behind almost every act of terror in the name of Islam.

More correctly, the Brotherhood has been a tool shared by numerous Western intelligence agencies, starting with the Nazis, followed by the CIA, but also the Russians, French, Germans and Israelis.

Since the Truman and Eisenhower administrations, the Muslim Brotherhood has been used to rally naive Muslims under the banner of Islam. Ever since, the Americans and others have been able to manage the Brotherhood like a rabid dog on a leash to keep the atheist Communist threat at bay.

With the collapse of the Cold War however, the Brotherhood has been used as the bogey man which the Americans can chase into the Middle East and Central Asia, starting with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Israel's long-standing relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood was instrumental in the founding of an offshoot organization, Hamas.

According to Robert Dreyfuss, author of "Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam":

"And beginning in 1967 through the late 1980s, Israel helped the Muslim Brotherhood establish itself in the occupied territories. It assisted Ahmed Yassin, the leader of the Brotherhood, in creating Hamas, betting that its Islamist character would weaken the PLO."

According to Charles Freeman, former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, "Israel started Hamas. It was a project of Shin Bet [Isreali domestic intelligence agency], which had a feeling that they could use it to hem in the PLO."

One aspect of that strategy was the creation of the Village Leagues, over which Yassin and the Brotherhood exercised much influence. Israel trained about 200 members of the Leagues and recruited many paid informers.

New York Times Reporter David Shipler cites the Israeli military governor of Gaza as boasting that Israel expressly financed the fundamentalists against the PLO:

"Politically speaking, Islamic fundamentalists were sometimes regarded as useful to Israel, because they had conflicts with the secular supporters of the PLO. Violence between the two groups erupted occasionally on West Bank university campuses. Israeli military governor of the Gaza Strip, Brigadier General Yitzhak Segev, once told me how he had financed the Islamic movement as a counterweight to the PLO and the Communists. 'The Israeli Government gave me a budget and the military government gives to the mosques,' he said."

As Dreyfuss notes, "during the 1980s, the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza and the West Bank did not support resistance to the Israeli occupation. Most of its energy went to fighting the PLO, especially its more left-wing factions, on university campuses."

After the Palestinian uprising of 1987, the PLO accused Hamas and Yassin of acting "with the direct support of reactionary Arab regimes... in collusion with the Israeli occupation."

Yasser Arafat complained to an Italian newspaper: "Hamas is a creation of Israel, which at the time of Prime Minister Shamir, gave them money and more than 700 institutions, among them schools, universities and mosques." Arafat also maintained that Israeli prime minister Rabin admitted to him in the presence of Hosni Mubarak that Israel had supported Hamas.

Essentially, as analyst Ray Hannania pointed out, in "Sharon's Terror Child", published in Counterpunch, "undermining the peace process has always been the real target of Hamas and has played into the political ambitions of Likud. Every time Israeli and Palestinian negotiators appeared ready to take a major step forward achieving peace, an act of Hamas terrorism has scuttled the peace process and pushed the two sides apart."

In "Hamas and the Transformation of Political Islam in Palestine", for Current History, Sara Roy wrote:

"Some analysts maintain that while Hamas leaders are being targeted, Israel is simultaneously pursuing its old strategy of promoting Hamas over the secular nationalist factions as a way of ensuring the ultimate demise of the [Palestinian Authority], and as an effort to extinguish Palestinian nationalism once and for all."

CONCLUSION

The Muslim Brotherhood, and its many manifestations like Al Qaeda and bin Laden, serve as an ever-present and manufactured "terrorist" threat, used constantly as a pretext to justify repressive measures at home and expanded imperialistic objectives abroad.

Because, despite all the rhetoric about the threat of "political Islam", unbeknownst to the general public, the manipulation of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the world is still a mainstay of American foreign policy.

Full article Here

Global media serves 'The Synagogue of Satan'

2011-06-11T03:29:00.000-07:00

From 'No one to vote for' blog

.

On the BBC lunchtime News today it was reported that "20 Palestinian protesters have died" at the Syrian border of the Golan Heights (BBC website article here).

Notice that the report did not say that the protesters had been shot by Israeli soldiers.

Israelis get shot, murdered, persecuted, exterminated.

Other peoples are much more fortunate. They die by their own actions. They alone are responsible for their dying.

The newsreader then interviewed an IDF spokeswoman who claimed that the protesters had died "as a direct result of their own actions. They were throwing petrol bombs. We shot over their heads.......then we used teargas......then we shot at their feet......we took every measure to resolve the situation without casualties but by their own actions protesters unfortunately died."

The only surprise or deviation from the usual Israeli response to such incidents is that the IDF woman did not call the dead people 'terrorists'.

These outrageous lies were contradicted by the BBC's own news bulletin last night (Sunday 5th June).

Reporter Kevin Connolly had also used 'died' rather than 'were shot' phraseology and, watching, I considered his report similarly biased to today's. However, his pictures showed the shootings followed by a barrage of teargas from the Israeli troops and Connolly finished with the comment, "Some might wish to ask the uncomfortable question as to why it was that Israeli military used lethal force before moving on to the use of non-lethal force."

Thank you Kevin.

It is not reasonable to suppose that today's BBC news teams do not know the facts of the Golan murders. It is not reasonable to suppose that their presentation of a new 'corrected' Israeli narrative for the slaughter could have been a mere 'accident'.

The IDF spokeswoman could easily have been challenged as the murdering liar she provably is.

No such challenge was made in spite of the BBC's possession of the facts of the incident.

The UK is, spiritually and mentally speaking, an occupied country.

Israel can do as it pleases and the media hoors (who enjoy lavish lifestyles funded by our taxation) will continue to serve the interests of the international bankers who use Israel to project their divide-and-rule strategies across a suffering world.

The BBC covers up every Israeli crime.

When the time comes that the great crimes of 9/11 and 7/7 (and others) are exposed people will discover that Israeli fingerprints are all over these too.

This day will come.

Too many people know the truth.

Too many people have had enough of the lies and crimes of the gangsters that dominate our lives.

When Christ drove the moneychangers from the Temple and warned the Jews against the leadership (Pharisees) that had risen to dominance over the Jewish people, He was warning us all.

BUT WE DID NOT LISTEN.

OVER THE PAST TWO MILLENIA THESE FORCES HAVE, THROUGH THEIR MONEY-LENDING PRACTICES AND BY THEIR TALMUDIC/MASONIC IDEOLOGY, TAKEN CONTROL OF OUR VERY SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT.

International bankers who dominate and lead the corporate world and who work hand-in-hand alongside those Jews and gentiles who hold to the self-serving, power-crazed Talmudic ideology are the enemy.

They are an enemy within.

Not without.

They are paving the way for their 'Jewish King'.

These are the 'The Synagogue of Satan'.

.....and their agents are, knowingly or unknowingly, in controlling positions at the top of just about every organisation out there, including 'the opposition', which is clearly also under control.......

.......for now.

The answer, my friend, ain't blowing' in the wind

2011-06-11T02:41:00.000-07:00

Following the revelation that we’re all paying a secret stealth tax to subsidise so-called renewable energy sources, it seems like a good time to check out exactly what we are getting for our money.

At midday yesterday, wind power was contributing just 2.2 per cent of all the electricity in the National Grid. You might think that’s a pretty poor return on the billions of pounds spent already on Britain’s standing army of windmills.

But it’s actually a significant improvement on the last time I checked the wholesale electricity industry’s official website. At the turn of the year, the figure was 1.6 per cent. During the cold snap the turbines had to be heated to stop them freezing and were actually consuming more electricity than they generated.

Worth it? Wind power contributes just 2.2 per cent to the overall electricity of the National Grid

Even on a good day, they rarely work above a quarter of their theoretical capacity. And in high winds they have to be turned off altogether to prevent damage. Britain’s 3,426 wind turbines produce no more electricity than a single, medium-sized gas-fired power station.

Any sane individual would conclude that wind generation is hopelessly inefficient and horribly expensive and stop throwing good money after bad.

But when did sanity ever have anything to do with government policy?

Ministers are planning to install another 12,500 of these worse-than-useless windmills, some of them up to three times the size of existing monstrosities.

We are paying for all this through hidden charges which now make up a fifth of all gas and electricity bills. The average household has to fork out an extra £200 a year.

That’s because the Government forces energy companies to buy from renewable sources, which are far more expensive than conventional power stations. The cost is then passed on to the consumer.

Ministers know there would be an outcry if they raised taxes to pay for windmills, so they hide the subsidies in our gas and electricity bills and hope the energy companies get the blame.

Scottish Power has just announced it is increasing gas prices by 19 per cent and electricity by 10 per cent. Although there is little the companies can do about rising world commodity prices, our bills are being artificially inflated as a direct result of the Government’s insane ‘climate change’ policies.

(Thanks John)

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2001877/Green-fuel-tax-The-answer-friend-aint-blowing-wind.html#ixzz1OxXUSeDy

MR SMILEY, SMILEY, HOPE AND CHANGE ...

2011-05-28T04:09:00.000-07:00

... HEAR NO EVIL, SEE NO EVIL, SPEAK NOT OF EVIL

Obama is a man of war claiming to stand for peace; a man of lies talking about standing for integrity. The dream-world is on public display. Boy Bush was a deeply unpleasant character; grossly arrogant in a ‘my daddy is bigger than your daddy’ sort of way; and an empathy-deficient idiot. But Obama is far beyond that. This man is dark, real dark. Behind the painted smile lies a cold, calculating, ruthless, narcissistic, psychopath/sociopath with eyes to match.

Sociopath: ‘A person whose behaviour is antisocial and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.’ Narcissist: ‘Inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity. Erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.’ Psychopath: ‘A person afflicted with a personality disorder characterised by a tendency to commit antisocial and sometimes violent acts and a failure to feel guilt for such acts.’

In other words, a lack of empathy with those who suffer the consequences of your actions. The same as Blair, Cameron, Bush, Cheney, ad infinitum. This is the Illuminati blueprint for their place-people in government. How could it be anything else when empathy would stop you slaughtering the innocent? What use is a conscience to a tyranny?

Obama and Cameron are blueprint ‘leaders’ and the blueprint is Blair. For a decade, former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, perfected the mould which was used to clone this pair of professional liars and hypocrites. Its basic software program is to constantly smile in public to hide the darkness of your eyes which betray the darkness of your soul; and to speak of peace, justice, integrity and ‘values’ while you bomb vast numbers of people unjustly under the cover of lies and deceit, because you ‘value’ only power and to follow the orders of your hidden masters.

Isn’t that right, Mr Rothschild?

Blair sent British forces to war five times in his first six years in office – more than any other prime minister in history – and yet claimed to stand for peace and integrity, as do Obama and Cameron today, as they currently engage their troops in open wars and many others if you include the dark arts of covert manipulation and, in Obama’s case, the gathering war with Pakistan. But, of course, in line with the Blair Blueprint, they have to hide what they really are behind carefully-designed fake personas called ‘nice chap, man of the people, one of us, pretty straight kind of guy.’

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS

2011-05-28T03:12:00.000-07:00

KEV BOYLE, NO ONE TO VOTE FOR

.
I have nothing original to say on the subject of our seemingly hopeless oppression.......but how dire the situation sometimes appears?

There is no lie so great that the mainstream media will not propagate it as truth.

Entrapped within this matrix of simply enormous lies, it is difficult to imagine a way out for ourselves.

But there is more at work in heaven and earth than the mere minds of men.

One can understand why the powers-that-be allow revolutionary background noise on the internet. They have been fighting their war for a long time and they obviously believe that they have already won it.

Either that or they are afraid that if they stop people writing their articles, large numbers will take to the streets and become much more dangerous to their project.

JOHN KAMINSKY

There is a writer called John Kaminsky who has been focusing his attention on organised Jewry or, as he is more inclined to call them, 'The Jews' for many years. A person (a friend) I know in the 'alternative' media has called him a Zionist agent because his verbal accusations and attacks against Jews have been so intense and because Kaminsky often fails to distinguish between 'Zionists' and 'ordinary Jews'.

It is well-known that 'anti-Semitism' is the Rabbis' greatest ally. They teach their people that this 'anti-semitism' is an irrational hatred that goyim have for all Jews. By such lies, and by the corrupting power exercised by their moneyed Zionist allies, they control their flock and induct them deeper into their unholy project.

I believe that Kaminsky is not only genuine but that he is right (the friend is genuine too, but we all make mistakes....here's hoping I'm right this time....I do think so).

'ORGANISED JEWRY' AT WAR WITH THE WORLD

The Jews (or, as one should perhaps put it) 'organised Jewry' are the primary entity at war with the mass of decent humanity.

Jews are at they very core of the FINANCIAL OLIGARCHY. There are Jewish names on all the banks.

The BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT has interbred with Jewish bankers over the generations. The Royal family is Jewish. Maybe the British Empire was, at its heart, a Jewish project?

Though there are all races involved, near to and supporting the top of the power pyramid, the dominant group within this power matrix is surely Jewish. Jews similarly dominated SOVIET COMMUNISM. Although only 50% of the leadership, their greater coherence and co-operation made them the dominant Soviet faction for most of the life of the Soviet state.

LOOK AROUND YOU

Jews dominate every observable area of public life.

They dominate POLITICS to the point where one might say that they OWN our governments. 80% of Conservative MP's are Friends of Israel. British Prime Ministers' seem to move around shadowed by some Jewish money-bags or other. The current Prime Minister's personal fortune is founded on the drug-running activities of his Jewish great grandfather, who was such a nice man he founded his own bank.

In the USA the situation appears to be, if anything, worse.

'Nuff said.

Jews dominate BUSINESS. The big banks are Jewish. The big food stores, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Marks and Spencer's are Jewish. Billionaire Philip Green dominates the clothing industry and more.

In SPORT there's Formula One motor racing (Bernie Ecclestone), Premier League football (Roman Abramovich, the Glazers etc., etc..)

The MEDIA and PUBLISHING are dominated by Jews.

The MUSIC INDUSTRY is run by Jews.

HOLLYWOOD is entirely dominated by Jews.

The EDUCATION SYSTEM is controlled by government policies generated within think-tanks funded by banking/corporate finance. So who controls that?

Kaminsky is right. There is a 'destabilisation template' at work. It's principles have been written down by various groups over the centuries from the so-called Illuminati (and before), The Protocols of Zion to the subtle developments now being implement along the lines recommended in the writings of the 'Frankfurt School' psychologists.

The influence of the Jews is UNIVERSAL and OVERWHELMINGLY DOMINEERING.

Even the CATHOLIC CHURCH is now a department of Jewry.

I was raised a Catholic and although I might now reject its authority, the Church did spend a great deal of time educating me in the sayings, teachings and about the example of Jesus Christ. Today, it seems to me, the Catholic Church has ditched Jesus in favour of Orthodox Rabbis. (i.e. the inheritors and current practitioners of the religion of Pharisees).

The Pharisees, in case you didn't know, convinced the Romans that they had to crucify Christ.

The Pharisees have been absolved of guilt for this crime by the current Pope. So Orthodox Jews continue in their foul faith while so-called Christians abandon theirs.

Enough is enough.

We must call a spade a spade.

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS.

The Frankfurt School psychologists promoted the ideas of anti-racist offenses and mass immigration in order to destroy racial cohesion in our societies. How successful these Jewish social engineers have been. And while we were abandoning and making an unforgivable crime of racism, the Jews have been been practicing it intensively, relentlessly, most determinedly.....as no other race ever has...to the point where they either own or control almost everything.

They have destroyed our ability to defend ourselves in order to achieve their own racist ends.

For us anti-racism has become a moral imperative.

For them it is a way of destroying the opposition.

A quote from the Koran comes to mind here: " God judges a man not by his actions but by his intention."

The wickedness and nerve of these people takes ones breath away.

We must go to the Jews in a spirit of love, as Christ did, and tell them that they are being misled.

WE TOO, OF COURSE, ARE BEING MISLED....BUT JEWS AT THE TOP ARE THE VANGUARD OF THE DECEIVERS.

We must tell them that their leadership (who they have made ours) are, as Christ said, "of Satan".

We must do no violence against them, though I believe their leaders would happily murder us all( Well, that's what they say anyway).

WE MUST EXPOSE THE GREAT LIES THAT EMPOWER THEM.

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER ONE:

The root of their power over us is the guilt we have been conditioned to feel over 'The Holocaust'.

This story is a huge over-inflated LIE.

There were no homicidal gas-chambers. NONE. There were hygenic gas chambers for delousing clothes of the workers (i.e. to keep them healthy). Anyone who spends the time to research this issue will discover for themselves that there is no end to the lies behind this great hoax (that was not launched in earnest until about 1970)

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER TWO:

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB .

Completely provably.

It is also clear that 9/11 was primarily as Israeli project.

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER THREE:

7/7 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.

Less obviously than 9/11, but an inside job nonetheless.

LIE/FRAUD NUMBER FOUR:

The MONEY-CREATION SCAM.

This is the engine that underpins all their power. It has got to be swept away.

BY US.

NOT BY THEM, AS THEY INSTALL SOME NEW SEEMINGLY ATTRACTIVE SYSTEM THAT WILL BIND US EVER-MORE-TIGHTLY UNDER THEIR HEARTLESS YOKE.

There are many more big lie/scams but that will do for a start.

ALSO PRAY

Christ IS the spirit of God in man.

Christ loves all men and women. HE loves those that reject HIM as truly as those that love HIM. HIS spirit is the Father's and God can only love.

Christ came to save the Jews and all men through them. Those Jews that accepted him founded Christianity and gave us the basis of western culture.

Those that rejected him remain lost and damage not only themselves but all who fall under their influence.

GOD made us free. It is we who must choose to change as God cannot make us.

Those who reject HIM would do well to remember that in the eternal world and in this (for Christ is alive today), Lucifer is crushed.

and GOD WINS.

So we must take care and be very slow to think ourselves wise.

However, we have heard the word of the prophets.

The Jews WILL accept Christ.

(.....and better sooner than later)

The Dying Art of Femininity

2011-05-28T03:09:00.000-07:00

HENRY MAKOW.COM

May 27, 2011

By Henry Makow, Ph.D. (originally posted in Oct. 2005, updated)

"Femininity is a gentle tender quality found in a woman's appearance, manner and nature. A feminine woman gives the impression of softness and delicateness. She has a spirit of sweet submission, and a dependency upon men for their care and protection. Nothing about her appears masculine, no male aggressiveness, competence, efficiency, fearlessness, strength, or the ability to kill her own snakes." (247)

Helen Andelin's Fascinating Womanhood (1963) is subversive to the New World Order because it upholds the inherent difference between the sexes and the basic laws governing marriage.

Such a book would never be published today. It is only available because it appeared 48 years ago and sold more than 2 million copies.

If you have any doubt about your sexual identity, I recommend Fascinating Womanhood. It is pertinent for men as well as women. I also recommend Andelin's Fascinating Girl for single women and her husband's Man of Steel and Velvet for men.

I'm not saying you should treat this model as gospel or that it's for everyone. It represents a timeless heterosexual paradigm that works. Every couple is different. Choose what is relevant to you and chuck the rest.

Femininity and masculinity are an art like playing the piano. They must be learned. We have to know the basics before we can improvise.

People are very malleable. Society is the target of a long-term hate campaign designed to degrade and discredit heterosexuality. Domestic violence and rape are highlighted to make women fear men, reject femininity and become masculine. The destruction of the family has always been the goal of the financial elite in order to control people. (See "The Illuminati Program") I will elaborate below.

THE BASICS OF FEMININITY

Andelin, who died in 2009, says a woman's happiness depends on her husband's lifelong devotion and love. This book teaches women how to be attractive to men, how to be feminine.

Andelin writes that women don't have to be beautiful to be feminine. "Acquire a feminine manner by accentuating the differences between yourself and men, not the similarities. Since the masculine manner is strong firm and heavy, yours should be gentle, delicate and light. Apply this in the way you walk, talk, use your hands and carry yourself." (256)

I can still remember how a girl I knew closed a kitchen cupboard with a motion of her hips. This happened 41 years ago when I was 20!

When Andelin writes that a feminine woman is never "crude, vulgar, harsh, overbearing or critical," it is apparent that the fair sex is being deliberately degraded and neutered by the media. "All your conversation should reflect tenderness, patience, forgiveness, tolerance and love."

A wife's first priority is her husband and then her children. Thus a single woman will consecrate herself for her future husband and children as much as possible. She will not be promiscuous.

Wives tend to put career, friends, parents, success and appearance before their husbands. "If you are a successful career woman, keep your priorities straight," Andelin writes. "Let your husband know by words and actions that he is number one." (95)

The woman's primary role is to be wife, mother and homemaker. The man's role is to be guide, protector and provider. This doesn't mean women can't have careers or men can't cook or change a diaper.

A man needs to feel that he is needed, and that he excels his woman in his role. If she becomes independent, he may question his purpose and his feelings for her "since his romantic feelings partly arise from her need to be protected, sheltered and cared for." (102)

A woman should accept her husband at face-value and not try to change him. His pride and freedom are inviolable. She should focus on his good qualities and he will improve naturally in response to her.

Reactions to Andelin are either very positive or very negative. One minister wrote on Amazon:" I have given approximately 250 copies of this book to women I have counseled in the past 5 years. In this period of time, I have yet to see ANY of them NOT improve their marriage by working on what they bring to the marriage, as an individual and to the whole."

Many women find the book outdated and laughable. One contentious point is that Andelin advises wives to adopt a childlike petulance when upset with their husband. A lot of women find this demeaning. But in practice, most men will respond positively when their authority is not directly challenged.

Andelin may be outdated at times but she has the basic principles right; it's up to us to adapt them.

Beautiful women are a dime a dozen but feminine women are rare. The world suffers the loss of feminine spiritual qualities: trust, modesty, grace, innocence, serenity, tenderness, patience and love. This is behind the male obsession with pornographic sex. Men unconsciously seek femininity and love to balance them. The restless masculine spirit seeks a calm harbor.

THE MONSTROUS HOAX

Men and women are the victims of a cruel hoax. They are taught that sexual differences are "socially conditioned." Ironically this lie is the actual "social conditioning". Sexual differences are inborn. For example, males have ten times the level of testosterone as women, and this determines their willingness to take risks, etc. Sex roles express natural differences and form the spice of life.

Feminism's Marxist principles of "equality" do not apply to loving heterosexual relationships and are in fact toxic. As I often say, heterosexual marriage is based on the exchange of female worldly power for male love. Equal power neuters both sexes.

Our leaders are accomplices to this monstrous hoax. Behind them are the private central bankers who print our currency in the form of a debt to them. They need a world government so no country can default on it. They need a dictatorship so the people cannot end this scam. They need to stunt our natural development by fostering gender confusion so we can be controlled.

The elitists present women's liberation as if a cherished housewife were the same as a concentration camp inmate. They present this vicious psychological assault as "progress," when in fact it is subversion on a grand scale.

Ladies, where do you think feminism came from? It was organized by the US Communist Party, the CIA and the elite media, all instruments of the central bankers. It is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

This weekend yet another movie opens about a woman who is a violent killer. "Domino" is the story of a female bounty hunter. The real-life inspiration for this story Domino Harvey died recently of a drug overdose or murder. No wonder young women are confused! Where do they see wives and mothers presented in a positive light? Women are always harried, arguing with men and running off to work.

I get email from feminists who say my articles are "hurtful." It's eerie how they all use that word and repeat the party line. I think it's "hurtful" that the super rich want to take the place of God and nature and enslave humanity. But these feminists don't get it. They don't get "A"'s for connecting feminism with the Rockefellers, Sept. 11 and Iraq, i.e. NWO Central Banker Dictatorship.

Feminism is designed to make women feel unworthy for devoting their lives to the people they love. It forces them out of the house where their employers can control them. It forces infants into joyless day cares subject to conditioning and who-knows-what-else .

I would never stand between anyone and their idea of fulfillment. But ladies, don't be so gullible! You're being defrauded of a lifetime of love. Have your careers later but don't forfeit your femininity and your chance to have a family.

-----------------

Two Great Books on Biological Gender Differences

Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")

2011-05-21T02:38:00.000-07:00

Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")

April 29, 2011

By Alcuin Bramerton

(for henrymakow.com)

(from July 27,2010)

It is accurate to posit that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are not independent, sovereign countries. However, these nations are not owned and run by the UK; they are owned and run by the House of Windsor Crown Temple syndicate within the City of London Corporation. The head signatory of the Crown Temple syndicate is Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England).

It should not be forgotten that the most powerful financial syndicate in the Western World is that of the European Rothschilds. The Rothschilds, because of their power base inside the City of London Corporation, have a controlling membership of the London Crown Temple syndicate, and they also have executive control of the Vatican and the Mafia though the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy.

The financial affairs of the new UK coalition government in London are also Rothschild-controlled. The line management here is understood to be Jacob Rothschild > Nathaniel Rothschild (N.M.Rothschild & Sons Limited, New Court, St Swithin's Lane, London EC4P 4DU) > Oliver Letwin > George Osborne (British Chancellor of the Exchequer).

Queen Elizabeth II fronts for the Rothschilds. She is the largest landowner on Earth. She is Head of State of the United Kingdom and of thirty one other states and territories, and is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the Earth's land surface. A conservative estimate of the value of the Crown Temple syndicate's land holding, under the Queen's signature, is £17.6 trillion.

(left Prince Phillip, is 89)

The Queen's syndicate land holdings are based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in each of those countries. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on Earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on Earth with 1,900 million acres, Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres, and the UK with 60 million acres.

Elizabeth Windsor and her covert syndicate in London are the world's largest landowners by a significant margin. The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen's land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres.

The 4th largest landowner on Earth is often said to be the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land area of the USA, 760 million acres. However, this Washington DC private corporation Federal Estate is actually owned and controlled by the London Crown Temple syndicate. Indeed, at the present time, the London syndicate in partnership with an old family Chinese syndicate, hold, and have activated, a $47 trillion World Court Writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve Board.

The five largest "personal" landowners on Earth, at present, are Queen Elizabeth II of England (6,600 million acres), King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (553 million acres), King Bhumibol of Thailand (126 million acres), King Mohammed IV of Morocco (113 million acres) and Sultan Quaboos of Oman (76 million acres). In reality, however, these named individuals are just the head signatories of old bloodline syndicates which act corporately through hidden family trusts.

More historical and current background about Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) is compiled here:

http://engforum.pravda.ru/index.php?/topic/188964-queen-elizabeth-ii-abdication-rumours-grow-in-england/

and

http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2011/04/altnews7-1ab-alcuin-alcuin-bramerton.html

Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System

2011-05-21T02:20:00.001-07:00

May 20, 2011

" If everyone
began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts
and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to
its knees in a matter of weeks if not days."

by Debra Siddons

(henrymakow.com)

For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH)
Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the
12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and politically-motivated charge
of attempting to "pervert the course of justice". For those of you
less familiar with this landmark case, John Anthony Hill is the
Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For more
details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please
visit the following links:-

http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/

There are two very important precedents that were established with
this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary
argument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction and
the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was based
on two distinct points. The first point being she was knowingly, and
with malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus
has never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may wish to
argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden
did at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony
because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.
In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract,
requiring the monarch's signature. Which brings us to the second
point.

At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract,
before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to
maintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with her
hand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible and
signing the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, found
in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly
prohibited.

The very first time that she gave "royal assent" to any piece of
man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the
British people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect.
To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times,
which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is therefore
without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of
high treason among her other numerous crimes.

All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or "her
majesty's" courts, which means every judge draws their authority from
her. All cases brought by the state are "Regina vs. Xxxxxxx", which
means they are all brought in the name of the queen. So if she isn't
really the monarch, then she doesn't have the authority or the
jurisdiction to bring a case against anyone else. And neither do any
of "her majesty's" courts or judges.

Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own
cause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealth
could lawfully rule on a challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty
of the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they are
obviously not impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way the
question of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be decided is by
a jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jury
trial to decide his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of
Elizabeth.

No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to
request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause.
That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do,
they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent
Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision is
immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact
that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular
point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority.

That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone
began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts
and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to
its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.

The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey the
Laws of God.

These two factual pieces of evidence ought to be presented at the
start, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully.

To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two pieces
of evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God's Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed forth maintaining only God's Laws with judges roles clearly defined.

Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the
Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God.

Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lacked
awareness of that which was in place, and there for people to use, but
didn't know. We know now.

For those of you in the United States who may be thinking "hey, we
aren't a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?" all you
really need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., stand
for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn't matter whether it
is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR
association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head
of the BAR.

So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now all
know a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACT
and use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we can put an end to this
insanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spread
the word to as many as possible so that this peaceful rebellion can
begin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of your
freedoms swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world into
bankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their "New World Order".

For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please visit:
http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm#crimes

By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end of
this very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting this
simple plan into motion that you may have forgotten there was a second
precedent set during this landmark case.

While the official reason for this trial was to address this
trumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to "pervert the course
of justice", the real reason for this trial was so the authorities
could punish John Anthony Hill for making the "7/7 Ripple Effect"
which, in less than an hour and using strictly mainstream media
reports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracy
theory. The film is so credible that even the prosecution at the
trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that
the film was made in such a way that it "changes the minds of people
who see it." That's how powerful the truth really is.

This was the first time this information was shown at an official
proceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of the
jurors felt the film accurately depicted what happened in London on
July 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. For
those unfamiliar with the case, JAH forwarded copies of the "7/7
Ripple Effect" to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope of
correcting misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at the
outset of the first trial of the supposed "7/7 helpers" (who were also
found not guilty).

John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record his
testimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the United
States and that both 9/11 and 7/7 were false flag attacks. He went on
to show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the
Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. She
reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with
the building clearly visible and still standing in the window behind
Jane Standley's left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had
foreknowledge of the event.

As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors by
the prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, the
truth that those two events were false flag attacks and that the
mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine
is now officially on record.

And the "Not Guilty" verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement of
that official record.

This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a new
beginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren't just nice sounding
words, but a reality. This could be heaven on earth instead of the
hell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow up
around us. Just as John Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all it
takes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil and
the courage to take action to do the right thing, regardless of the
personal cost.

"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
- Edmund Burke

Come on, Ireland

2011-05-21T02:13:00.001-07:00

The ADL's War On White America by Brother Nathanael Kapner

2011-05-14T03:56:00.003-07:00

Demjanjuk convicted in Kangaroo Court

2011-05-14T03:09:00.001-07:00

There was no evidence that Demjanjuk committed a specific crime. The prosecution in Germany was based on the theory that if Demjanjuk was at the camp, he was a participant in the killing -- the first time such a legal argument has been made in German courts!

***

Demjanjuk Convicted for Role in Nazi Death Camp

New York Times May 12, 2011

AN AFTERWORD BY MICHAEL HOFFMAN IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWS THIS REPORT

MUNICH — After a trial lasting almost 18 months, John Demjanjuk, a retired American autoworker who has been the subject of more than three decades of legal proceedings over his Nazi-era past, was convicted here on Thursday of helping to force some 28,000 Jews to their deaths during the Holocaust. He showed no reaction as the court handed down a five-year prison term, The Associated Press reported. It was not immediately clear how much credit he would get for time already served. His defense lawyers have already said they would appeal the conviction. His trial was one of the last of accused Nazi war criminals.

Prosecutors had charged that Mr. Demjanjuk, 91, worked as a guard at the Sobibor death camp in Nazi-occupied Poland in 1943. His trial in Munich, beginning in December 2009, was the second time Mr. Demjanjuk has been prosecuted — he was sentenced to death in Israel in 1988 only to have his conviction overturned five years later as a case of mistaken identity.

When the trial opened in Munich, Mr. Demjanjuk was listed by the Simon Wiesenthal Center as its most wanted Nazi war criminal.

Mr. Demjanjuk declined to make a final statement as he arrived in the courtroom in a wheelchair pushed by a German police officer. He was wearing a pale blue baseball cap and dark glasses.

His trial was held despite arguments by his lawyers and family that he was too sick to participate, because he suffered from ailments including bone marrow disease. Doctors, however, concluded that he could stand trial provide that hearings were restricted to two 90-minute sessions a day.

As survivors and defendants have aged and died, the prosecution of Nazi-era war criminals has become increasingly difficult because, 66 years after the end of World War II, few potential witnesses are still alive. In the absence of specific evidence against him, the case against Mr. Demjanjuk rested on the prosecution's charge that anyone working at the camp at the time he was there shared responsibility for its function of systematic murder.

"The court is convinced that the defendant served as a guard at Sobibor from March 27, 1943, to mid-September, 1943," the presiding judge, Ralph Alt said, according to the A.P.

The prosecution had also produced an identity card from the Nazi S.S. that, prosecutors alleged, shows a young Demjanjuk and indicated that he had undergone training at an S.S. camp. Mr. Demjanjuk's lawyers said that the card was forged by the Soviet K.G.B. (The FBI also said this, but the NY Times does not mention that fact here -- Hoffman)

Mr. Demjanjuk, who was born in Ukraine, was a soldier in the Soviet Army, fighting against the Germans, until he was captured in the Crimea in 1942.

He says he spent most of the remainder of the war as a prisoner. But according to prosecutors, he went to the S.S. training camp in Trawniki, Poland, where foreigners were trained to work as volunteers in the death camps.

The case against Mr. Demjanjuk involved some 15 transport trains known to have arrived between April and July 1943 from the Westerbork concentration camp in the Netherlands, carrying 29,579 people. Prosecutors initially charged Mr. Demjanjuk with 27,900 counts based on the theory that some must have died in transit or been spared for a time to work at the camp. By the end of the trial on Thursday, that figure had been revised to 28,060 counts.

Some 250,000 Jews were killed at Sobibor, most of them poisoned with exhaust fumes.

Mr. Demjanjuk was convicted and sentenced to death in Israel in 1988 as the infamously sadistic Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka, only to have his conviction overturned in 1993. He was freed by Israel's Supreme Court after evidence surfaced suggesting that another man was most likely to have been Ivan the Terrible.

In a statement on its Web site the day before the verdict, the Simon Wiesenthal Center said: "This case has historic meaning because while it may be the last 'major' case tried in Germany, it is the first time a non-German has been charged by Germany with Nazi war crimes and brought to trial in Germany."

Speaking to the German news agency on Thursday, Efraim Zuroff, the chief Nazi-hunter at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said the organization was "very satisfied" that Mr. Demjanjuk had been sentenced to a prison term. The court's decision "sends a very strong message that even many years after the crimes of the Holocaust, perpetrators can be held to account for their misdeeds," he said.

Avner Shalev, the head of the Yad Vashem Holocaust remembrance authority in Jerusalem said that, while "no trial can bring back those that were murdered," the conviction of Mr. Demjanjuk showed that theere was "no statute of limitations on the crimes of the Holocaust" and that the killings "could not have taken place without the participation of myriads of Europeans on many levels."

Elan Steinberg, the Vice President of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants said in a statement that the conviction was "a clarion pronouncement that the pursuit of justice should know no barriers of time and geography."

MICHAEL HOFFMAN'S AFTERWORD

Simon Wiesenthal was a con-man and a fantasist.

Look at the lavish attention paid to the statements filled with vengeful, Talmudic crowing by Efraim Zuroff, Avner Shalev and Elan Steinberg, and no coverage given to statements by Demjanjuk's family and supporters.

Why are there no Judaic kapos prosecuted for aiding the Nazis? It is said they were coerced. Demjanjuk was a prisoner of war. No coercion there?

Can any accused "Nazi" get a fair trial in Zionist Germany, where defense attorneys can be arrested for defending their accused clients too vigorously, and where writers and publishers such as Ernst Zundel, rot for years in prison because they dare to doubt Holocaustianity, the last truly believed religion in the otherwise agnostic West?

In 91-year-old John Demjanjuk, the Zionists have their pound of flesh.

FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Defending Ivan the Terrible: The Justice Department's Conspiracy to Convict John Demjanjuk
by Yoram Sheftel

From the Los Angeles Times, May 12, 2011:

There was no evidence that Demjanjuk committed a specific crime. The prosecution in Germany was based on the theory that if Demjanjuk was at the camp, he was a participant in the killing -- the first time such a legal argument has been made in German courts.

Integral to the German prosecution's case was an SS identity card that allegedly shows a picture of a young Demjanjuk, and indicates he trained at the SS Trawniki camp and was posted to Sobibor.

Though court experts said the card appears genuine, the defense maintains it is a fake produced by the Soviet KGB.

The U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Special Investigations also has said the card is genuine, but documents unearthed by The Associated Press indicate that the FBI at one time had doubts similar to those aired by Demjanjuk's defense about the evidence -- though the material was never turned over to them.

In a 1985 report, the FBI's Cleveland, Ohio, field office concluded that: "Justice is ill-served in the prosecution of an American citizen on evidence which is not only normally inadmissible in a court of law, but based on evidence and allegations quite likely fabricated by the KGB."

The revelation has led to new court action in the U.S., with a District Court judge in Cleveland on Tuesday agreeing to appoint a public defender to represent Demjanjuk there, raising the prospect of renewing the decades-old case.

False Flags - An American Tradition

2011-05-08T10:38:00.001-07:00

From rense.com

By Stephen Lendman
5-7-11

Wikipedia defines false or black flags as "covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities."

They're "big lies," defined by Merriam-Webster as "deliberate gross distortion(s) of the truth used especially as a propaganda tactic."

America's decade from September 11, 2001 to May 1, 2011 was punctuated by the (big) lie of our time and (big) lie of the moment.

Put another way, the official stories are falsified, myths, widely believed fantasies contrary to reality.

In his exhaustive research and writings, David Ray Griffin provided convincing evidence that 9/11 was an inside job and that bin Laden died of natural causes in mid-December 2001.

The former spawned a decade of overt and covert "war on terror" lawlessness at home and abroad. Policies and events following the second have yet to unfold, but expect little at best to be positive.

Past US false flags provided pretexts for militarism, wars, occupations, domestic repression, and national security state extremism, antithetical to democratically free and open societies. Allegedly removing America's "Enemy Number One," in fact, may intensify, not diminish, Washington's scheme for unchallengeable global dominance. More on him below.

With or without bin Laden, bogymen threats are plentiful. Since WW II alone, America's had numerous ones, including communists, Al Qaeda, WMDs, the Taliban, Gaddafi, and a host others yet unnamed, as well as numerous "foiled" domestic ones.

Among others, they include:

-- a fake shoe bomber;

-- fake underwear bomber;

-- fake Times Square bomber;

-- an earlier one there;

-- fake shampoo bombers;

-- fake Al Qaeda woman planning fake mass casualty attacks on New York landmarks;

-- fake Oregon bomber;

-- fake armed forces recruiting station bomber;

-- fake synagogue bombers;

-- fake Chicago Sears Tower bombers;

-- fake FBI and other building bombers;

-- fake National Guard, Fort Dix and Quantico marine base attackers;

-- fake 9/11 bombers; and
-- others to enlist public support for the fake war on terror and very real ones it spawned.

America, Pakistan, Bin Laden, Official Lies, and Misreporting

On May 5, New York Times writer Elisabeth Bumiller headlined, "Pentagon Breaks Silence on Pakistani Role," saying:

A "top Pentagon official said....Pakistan would have to work hard to rebuild relations with the United States Congress," including a commitment "to fighting terrorism...."

It suggests what some analysts suspect: namely, planned destabilization, confrontation, and balkanization for greater Eurasian control, as well as future terrorist false flags.

On May 5, Times writers Mark Mazzetti and Scott Shane headlined, "Data Show Bin Laden Plots; CIA Hid Near Raided House," saying:

Alleged "computer files and documents seized at the compound where Osama bin Laden was killed," reveal "considered attacks on American railroads, (but) there was no evidence of a specific plot."

Perhaps no files and documents either. For sure, no bin Laden.

Nonetheless, "(s)ince Sunday night, counterterrorism officials have been alert to (possible) new attacks from Al Qaeda to avenge its leader's death," especially at airports, rail facilities, and other strategic locations. "American officials and terrorism experts have warned that this is not the end of Al Qaeda," not, of course, if they're blamed for planned false flags to intensify US imperial wars.

Another May 5 Bumiller Times report ran cover for shifting official accounts about what really happened on May 1 headlined, "Raid Account, Hastily Told, Proves Fluid," saying:

"(I)t was a classic collision of a White House desire to promote a stunning national security triumph - and feed a ravenous media - while collecting facts from a chaotic military operation on the other side of the world. At the same time, White House officials worked hard to use the facts of the raid to diminish Bin Laden's legacy."

She continued, quoting an unnamed Pentagon official claiming no "intent to deceive or dramatize," adding that "Everything we put out we really believed to be true at the time." She also quoted Victoria Clarke, Bush Pentagon spokeswoman, saying, "First reports are always wrong. It's a fundamental truth in military affairs."

In other words, it was OK first to claim a fierce firefight in which no US forces were killed or hurt, then 24 hours later call the battle one-sided, Navy Seals quickly dispatching bin Laden's guards and "Enemy Number One," shooting him unarmed in the head.

Notably, however, there's no body, no photos, no video, no evidence, and no truth, just the media regurgitated big lie.

In fact, more lies compounded it, including about:

-- Pakistan's alleged knowledge of his presence;
-- claimed evidence confirming it and assault specifics; and

-- fabricated bad theater, explained in a slapdash, keystone cops manner.

High Level Skepticism

Appearing on CNN May 5, former Pakistani intelligence chief, Hamid Gul, told "In the Arena's" host Eliot Spitzer that bin Laden died years earlier, saying:

"Yes, I think he died - he perished some years ago, and I think this was a story which was created (because) nobody would want to believe this version....I (don't believe) the story which was given out by the American media and by the American administration."

Whoever was killed May 1 "was probably somebody else....(American authorities) must have known that he died some years ago....were keeping this story on the ice and they were looking for an appropriate moment" to announce it.

"(P)eople simply not in Pakistan alone but around the world....don't believe the stories that have been put out."

In other words, the entire account was fabricated, the event staged, Western media, including The New York Times, running cover for the big lie. Gul politely called it "a huge intelligence failure."

Notable American and Other False Flags

Discussed in earlier writing, numerous ones stand out, including:

-- In 1898, Spain was falsely accused of blowing up the USS Maine in Havana, Cuba harbor. The Spanish-American war followed.

-- On May 7, 1915, a German U-boat was accused of torpedoing the RMS Lusitania, killing 128 US citizens. It helped precipitate America's April 4, 1917 WW I entry, a war Woodrow Wilson wanted and got through a propaganda campaign, turning pacifist Americans into German haters. It was later learned that on board munitions, not a torpedo, exploded, sinking the ship.

-- In 1933 Germany, a week before general elections, the strategically timed Reichstag fire (home of the German parliament) was blamed on communists. President Paul von Hindenburg's emergency decree followed. Civil liberties were suspended. Weimar Republic democracy ended, and Hitler assumed fascist powers after enough Nazis were elected to assure it.

-- On August 31, 1939, Nazis impersonating Polish terrorists attacked the Gleiwitz radio station on the border between the two countries, starting WW II.

-- On December 7, 1941, Roosevelt manipulated Japan to attack Pearl Harbor, giving him the war he wanted from the early 1930s, but had to convince a pacifist public of the threat. The fleet was also tracked across the Pacific, but Admiral HE Kimmel wasn't warned or given known intelligence to assure enough mass casualties for congressional and public support.

-- Complicit with Washington, numerous 1949/1950 South Korean incursions north precipitated Pyongyang's retaliation in June 1950, giving Truman the war he wanted.

-- In 1962, a US Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed false flag never happened because Kennedy rejected it. Called Operation Northwoods (a part of Operation Mongoose), it included sinking US ships, shooting down US commercial airliners, blowing up buildings in US cities, attacking America's Guantanamo base, other incidents, and blaming it on Cuba as a reason for war.

-- The fake August 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident initiated full-scale retaliation against North Vietnam after Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorizing war without declaring it.

-- In October 1983, after ousting Prime Minister Maurice Bishop, US forces invaded Grenada, allegedly to rescue American medical students threatened by nonbelligerent Cubans building infrastructure.

-- In December 1989, manufactured incidents precipitated America's Panama invasion, deposing Manuel Noriega, one-time ally turned enemy because he forgot who's boss.

-- in August 1990, Washington colluded with the al- Sabah monarchy, entrapping Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait. In January 1991, it launched the Gulf War, followed by over two decades of sanctions, more war occupation, and destruction of the "cradle of civilization."

-- The September 11, 2001 false flag operation launched a decade of imperial wars against Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Palestine allied with Israel, perhaps others to come, as well as proxy wars in Somalia, Yemen, Bahrain, Central Africa, Haiti, Honduras, Colombia, and at home against Muslims, Latino immigrants, and working Americas.

On February 16, 2010, a Washington's blog web site (georgewashington2.blogspot.com) article titled, "Governments ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror" listed examples, including:

-- The CIA admitted its 1950s role in toppling Iran's democratically government in 1953.

-- Israel acknowledged a 1954 attack in Egypt, including planting bombs in US diplomatic facilities, leaving "evidence" of Arab involvement.

-- Indonesia's former president, Abdurrahman Wahid, said the nation's police or military most likely were involved in the 2002 Bali bombing, killing over 200 people.

-- A former Italian prime minister, judge, and military counterintelligence head, General Gianadelio Maletti, said America's CIA instigated and abetted right wing terrorist groups in the 1970s and earlier, including bombing a Milan bank in 1969 to rally popular anti-communist support in Italy and other European countries.
-- Many others, including former Carter administration National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, telling a Senate committee that a false flag terror attack on US soil might occur to blame Iran and justify war.

In his 1997 book, "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives," he said:

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat," the kind 9/11 created - predicted, planned, orchestrated, and carried out to further new world order global dominance.

Other False Flag Examples

-- The March 2004 Madrid train bombings occurred three days before Spain's general elections. With no supportive evidence, they were blamed on Al Qaeda, yet they stoked public fear of threats against other Western cities, including American ones.
-- The July 7, 2005 London underground bombings (called 7/7) were a series of attacks on the city's public transport system during the morning rush hour for maximum disruption and casualties. At precisely the same time, an anti-terror drill occurred, simulating real attacks. It was no coincidence, others in America and Britain came on the same day.

-- On 9/11 morning, the CIA ran a "pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building." Held at the Agency's Chantilly, Virginia Reconnaissance Office, AP reported (on August 22, 2002) that it simulated "a small corporate jet (hitting) one of the four towers....after experiencing a mechanical failure."

Unmentioned at the time was a later revealed (but unreported) Homeland Security conference announcement a year later to commemorate the 9/11 event. Held under the auspices of the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute, one of its speakers was John Fulton, CIA Chief of the Strategic War Gaming Division of the National Reconnaissance office in charge of the operation. Another coincidence, or was something more sinister afoot?

In October 2000, the Pentagon simulated a commercial plane striking the Pentagon, coordinated by its Command Emergency Response Team and the Defense Protective Services Police. This and the 9/11 exercises are more than coincidental, given what's now known and the fallout.

-- On June 30, 2007, a Jeep Cherokee with propane canisters crashed into Glasgow International Airport's glass doors, the BBC reporting that it "was in the middle of the doorway burning....The car didn't actually explode. There were a few pops and bangs which presumably was the petrol."

The usual suspects were falsely blamed, Al Qaeda and Islamic terrorists.

In Miami, on January 11, 2010 (one day before Haiti's earthquake), the Pentagon's US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) simulated a hurricane striking the island in preparation for subsequent measures to be implemented. A carefully prepared military operation, they included occupying, controlling, and plundering the island.

Also, Deputy SOUTHCOM head, General PK Keen, was in Haiti when the quake struck, ready to assume command when it did and use a communication tool called the Transnational Information Sharing Cooperation project (TISC), linking other nations and NGOs with the Pentagon and US government to facilitate measures to be implemented. None were to help Haitians.

A Final Comment

Exposed as bad theater, New York Times writer Elizabeth Harris further discredited the broadsheet, headlining:

"Al Qaeda Confirms Bin Laden's Death," citing an unconfirmed statement, warning of new attacks to come. It also said an audio recording days before his death will soon be released. In fact, past video and audio ones were exposed as fakes.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/

7/7 A MONUMENTAL LIE

2011-05-08T10:02:00.000-07:00

N.K. 'Terror on the tube'

Five years after the event, we have a judgement from Britain’s High Court:

The 7/7 killings were ‘unlawful.’ Uh-huh.
Nobody was to blame, except the wicked Four who are dead.
A public enquiry into 7/7 would not be a good idea.
There is no need for an Inquest into the Four alleged perpetrators.
No ‘conspiracy’ would have been possible

We should here remind ourselves, as to the proper purpose of an inquest.

An inquest is meant to come to a judgement concerning cause of death.

In the very strange circumstances of the 7/7 Inquest, Lady Justice Hallett could not do this because no post-portems had been performed upon the 52 dead bodies.

Instead she has produced a rather long judgement proceeding from the unproven assumption that the Four were guilty of the crime. She has chosen elements of the evidence presented to fit in with this erroneous assumption.

Bearing in mind her Ladyship’s overall approach one might fairly protest that criminal guilt is not the business of an Inquest. It is the business of a criminal court where adversarial lawyers representing two opposing viewpoints grill witnesses, enabling one of their competing narratives to gain an ascendancy.

As in any murder trial, the Inquest should have first considered whether any of the Four owned a weapon that would have been capable of perpetrating the crime. Can it be shown that any of them had a ‘bomb’? I believe it cannot. If they bought 30% peroxide from a hydroponics shop, then what? If there is no murder weapon, there is no criminal guilt.

Then the Inquest has to show that the Four were up in King’s Cross station that morning by 8.30 am at the latest. I believe the weight of evidence is massively against this.

The Inquest should have been able to show that credible CCTV evidence existed of the Four in London on that morning. They have surely failed in this respect - they have produced no such credible evidence. One excellent justification for the holding of a public enquiry would be to ascertain why the most CCTV-rich environment on planet Earth could not produce one single credible CCTV image of the Four in London on the morning of 7/7.

A proper Inquest should have asked if the pattern of damage of the coaches – in the shape of the holes in the floor & the distribution of dead bodies & the sitting positions of persons who had legs and feet blown off – were at all concentric, around alleged positions of the rucksacks? I believe we have seen abundant evidence that this was not the case & that fatalities were spread in a more elongated shape along the central axes of the carriages. In the case of the Edgware Road blast, the carriage had three big holes in the floor, one some fifteen feet from the other two, and was lifted clean off the rails! No person capable of rational thought could suppose a rucksack on the floor did that.

Has not the suicide-bomber hypothesis been conclusively refuted by such factual and scientific evidence? In a normal court of law it is such physical evidence that would carry the greater weight.

While the Inquest heard from literally hundreds of witnesses, how is it that it could not find one single credible witness who saw any of the Four on the train coaches or on the number 30 bus? Yes it produced Mr Danny Biddle (‘I saw Khan’) and Lisa French on the 30 bus; but I suggest any psychologist would conclude that these witnesses were not reliable: Mr Biddle’s testimony has flipped about like a flag on a pole while Ms French only acquired her ‘memory’ of seeing Hasib Hussein some years after the event. Both had been put, I suggest, under enormous pressure to produce their ‘eyewitness’ evidence.

Instead of attempting to dismiss ‘conspiracy theories’ on its last day, the Inquest should have started off with certain facts that would surely act as starting points for an entirely different conspiracy theory:

1) the fact that three coaches (and maybe also the 30 bus) were kept hidden then destroyed after the first year of the Met’s investigation (‘Operation Theseus’): this is the primary evidence at the scene of the crime.

2) the fact that no post-mortems were conducted on any victims,.

3) The fact that so much of the CCTV that must have existed of the day of the Four …. cannot be shown.

Answering the question, ‘Is an Inquest into the deaths of the Four necessary?’, Lady Justice Hallett states,

I can find no cause whatsoever to resume the inquests into the deaths of the four men. None of the families have sought to argue that any of these inquests should be resumed.

One is puzzled by that silence – given that members of two of the families appealed to be allowed to give evidence at the Inquest but were refused.

The reliable website ‘Official confusion’ states that at least some of the bodies of the Four were handed back to the families intact. We want to hear the view of the families as to whether or not this is the case. Was the cause of death a bullet through the back of the head, or a rucksack blowing up?

There has been an enormous lack of testimony from Pakistan from the relatives of the Four. There have been repeated allegations that the Four attended Jihad or terror-training camps. Is this true or were they simply visiting their families? We need to hear the families’ responses to these assertions.

Item 63 of the Verdict:

On the evidence, 18 Alexandra Grove was the main bomb factory from its acquisition until the bombers’ departure on the morning of 7/7. It was rented by a man called Samir Alani who returned to Iraq and left the keys with a relative. He in turn rented it out to Jermaine Lindsay (calling himself “Jamal”).

Mr Alani left for Baghdad a couple of months before – however the flat was then rented out to Leeds PhD chemist Magdy Al-Nashar, who was a friend of Jermaine Lindsey, it certainly was not rented to Lindsay. El-Magdy flew off to Cairo (with a return ticket) days before 7/7.

The Unthinkable ‘Conspiracy theory’ - Lady Justice Hallett, paragraph 9:

‘To argue or find to the contrary [ie that Khan, Tanweer, Hussein and Lindsay were not the bombers] would be irrational. It would be to ignore a huge body of evidence from a vast array of sources. Had there been a conspiracy falsely to implicate any of the four in the murder plot, as some have suggested, it would have been of such massive proportions as to be simply unthinkable in a democratic country. It would have involved hundreds of ordinary people, members of the bombers’ families, their friends, their fellow terrorists, independent experts, scientists, as well as various police forces and the Security Service [MI5]. It would have cost millions of pounds to fabricate the forensic evidence. Independent barristers and solicitors who have had access to the source material (for example the CCTV footage) during the criminal trials and these proceedings would have had to be involved. Just to state the proposition is to reveal its absurdity.’

It happened that this verdict immediately followed the farcical pretence that Osama Bin Laden had just been shot (May 1st) when he’d actually been dead for many years – it made front page headlines everywhere, with no peep of protest from the British media. Does not this rather undermine the claim that no large number of people can be involved in a ‘conspiracy?’ globally, the only national TV station (that I could see) to cast doubt upon the official story of Bin Laden was the Iranian Press TV.

Every Bin Laden video and tape since 2001 has been faked – and not a single British media outlet can allow itself to contemplate this possibility: it would mean the ‘War on Terror’ was totally and horrifically bogus.

Let’s here quote from Michael Ruppert’s 600-page masterpiece ‘Crossing the Rubicon’ about who did 9/11. How many might have had foreknowledge of the event? ‘The number of people with complete foreknowledge of the attacks of September 11th would likely not exceed two dozen.’ (p.3)

National Security is a terrible concept, and what lurks behind the veils of secrecy?

The deaths are real, but the story is bogus.

Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

2011-05-08T09:26:00.000-07:00

Kev Boyle 'NO ONE TO VOTE FOR'

What will become of a people too mentally lazy and stupidly trusting to take an interest in their own survival?

Yesterday Mike Adams published an excellent article titled 'The Gullible Mind Explained'. It could have been describing the wall of uncritical and lazy reporting now hitting the airwaves regarding Lady Justice Hallett's report on the recent 7/7 Inquest.

The content of this report was easily predictable. Simply inevitable.

There are two competing narratives to explain this crime:

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'.

As you will have guessed, I am one of the many who subscribe to conspiracy theory number two.

HERE'S WHY

After 9/11 the murderous confabulation that is modern history soared and raged all around us under guise of a ‘War on Terror’, providing the necessary pretext for just about anything the western military-industrial complex felt like doing. However, in the UK we (or should I say the Labour government) had a serious problem. Although Blair and his army of stooges signed up to every invasion and participated loyally in every occupation, the one thing our ‘War on Terror’ was short on was…..the terror. It appeared that British Muslims, peeved though they undoubtedly were at watching their co-religionists being slaughtered by the million in Iraq, just wouldn’t turn their energies toward blowing up their fellow Englishmen. The ‘War on Terror’ was happening somewhere else.

The fact that on 7/7/05 four (or more) explosions killed fifty-two innocent people making their way to work on a Thursday morning changed all that.

Nonetheless the story, universally accepted by the British media (if not across the country), that four Islamic-terrorist suicide-bombers murdered them remains an unproven and (as I will attempt to explain) highly unlikely conspiracy theory.

Firstly it needs to be noted that the refusal of both the Labour and the new Tory/Liberal alliance to hold a public Inquiry into the events of 7/7 should ring a very loud alarm bell for every British citizen. This was the largest mass-murder ever on British soil. One might have expected the promoters of the 'War on Terror' to use a Public Inquiry to cash in on an incident that would make and massively boost their case.

In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case, so one should perhaps begin here.

The Explosives

Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:

The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.

On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)

On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’

From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’

The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.

Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?

There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.

Why Suicide?

Moving on to another very obvious question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?

Drills

There were four uncannily accurate drills carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.

2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!

3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”

4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.

Why No Post-Mortems?

Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.

Body Count reveals no Bombers

The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short

At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. Here is surely the clearest possible evidence that the alleged bombers were never on the trains. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.

Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused

Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.

Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber.

A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.

And More

There are many, many other serious anomalies in the official narrative.

The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.

On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.

This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).

Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

The Evidence against ‘The Four’

Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).

Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.

Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.

P.S. Muad’Dib

The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don't know the film). Hill, a very unusual character in many ways, has renamed himself Muad’Dib, after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is his basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.
When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.
Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.
Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.
His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly. His case is being heard in Southwark Crown Court on next Monday Morning 9th May 2011.

WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

For me, there is only one sensible explanation to explain the facts of 7/7/05. Unfortunately this is a very unpleasant explanation.

Let us ask the hard questions of all our leaders, MP's, journalists, teachers, police, military and the rest.....

.......What will become of us if we continue to allow ourselves to be led by such criminals, people who are prepared to commit acts of false flag terrorism against their own people?

Think about it Constable, Sargeant, Brigadier, Headmaster, News editor, everyone.......

There is no such thing as an innocent bystander. To stand and watch is to be complicit. Standing and watching is passive approval.

.
PrintPrint Friendly
Posted by NO ONE TO VOTE FOR at 10:42
Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
16 comments:

Top US Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag

2011-05-06T06:26:00.000-07:00

Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations Steve R. Pieczenik says he is prepared to tell a federal grand jury the name of a top general who told him directly 9/11 was a false flag attack

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet.com

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.

Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.

Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop, “the basic tenets for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government,” while also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were later employed around the world.

Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked on George W. Bush’s election campaign against Al Gore. His record underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in intelligence circles over the past three decades plus.

The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik.

Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months,” and that the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80′s.

Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, “Not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome,” adding that the US government knew Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan.

Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the sufferer.

“He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the intelligence community knew about it,” said Pieczenik, noting how CIA physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital in Dubai.

“He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already dying, so nobody had to kill him,” added Pieczenik, stating that Bin Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.

“Did the intelligence community or the CIA doctor up this situation, the answer is yes, categorically yes,” said Pieczenik, referring to Sunday’s claim that Bin Laden was killed at his compound in Pakistan, adding, “This whole scenario where you see a bunch of people sitting there looking at a screen and they look as if they’re intense, that’s nonsense,” referring to the images released by the White House which claim to show Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton watching the operation to kill Bin Laden live on a television screen.

“It’s a total make-up, make believe, we’re in an American theater of the absurd….why are we doing this again….nine years ago this man was already dead….why does the government repeatedly have to lie to the American people,” asked Pieczenik.

“Osama Bin Laden was totally dead, so there’s no way they could have attacked or confronted or killed Osama Bin laden,” said Pieczenik, joking that the only way it could have happened was if special forces had attacked a mortuary.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (AD)

Pieczenik said that the decision to launch the hoax now was made because Obama had reached a low with plummeting approval ratings and the fact that the birther issue was blowing up in his face.

“He had to prove that he was more than American….he had to be aggressive,” said Pieczenik, adding that the farce was also a way of isolating Pakistan as a retaliation for intense opposition to the Predator drone program, which has killed hundreds of Pakistanis.

“This is orchestrated, I mean when you have people sitting around and watching a sitcom, basically the operations center of the White House, and you have a president coming out almost zombie-like telling you they just killed Osama Bin Laden who was already dead nine years ago,” said Pieczenik, calling the episode, “the greatest falsehood I’ve ever heard, I mean it was absurd.”

Dismissing the government’s account of the assassination of Bin Laden as a “sick joke” on the American people, Pieczenik said, “They are so desperate to make Obama viable, to negate the fact that he may not have been born here, any questions about his background, any irregularities about his background, to make him look assertive….to re-elect this president so the American public can be duped once again.”

Pieczenik’s assertion that Bin Laden died almost ten years ago is echoed by numerous intelligence professionals as well as heads of state across the world.

Bin Laden, “Was used in the same way that 9/11 was used to mobilize the emotions and feelings of the American people in order to go to a war that had to be justified through a narrative that Bush junior created and Cheney created about the world of terrorism,” stated Pieczenik.

During his interview with the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Pieczenik also asserted he was directly told by a prominent general that 9/11 was a stand down and a false flag operation, and that he is prepared to go to a grand jury to reveal the general’s name.

“They ran the attacks,” said Pieczenik, naming Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Stephen Hadley, Elliott Abrams, and Condoleezza Rice amongst others as having been directly involved.

“It was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses….it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz – I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open,” said Pieczenik, adding that he was “furious” and “knew it had happened”.

“I taught stand down and false flag operations at the national war college, I’ve taught it with all my operatives so I knew exactly what was done to the American public,” he added.

Pieczenik re-iterated that he was perfectly willing to reveal the name of the general who told him 9/11 was an inside job in a federal court, “so that we can unravel this thing legally, not with the stupid 9/11 Commission that was absurd.”

Pieczenik explained that he was not a liberal, a conservative or a tea party member, merely an American who is deeply concerned about the direction in which his country is heading.

World Bank: Food prices have entered the 'danger zone'

2011-04-15T14:16:00.001-07:00

Food prices have entered the “danger zone”, threatening to condemn a generation to extreme poverty and malnutrition, the World Bank has warned.

The food problem has been exacerbated by weather problems in Russia, Ukraine, North America and China. Photo: Reuters

By Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor in Washington 5:56PM BST 14 Apr 2011

56 Comments

Robert Zoellick, World Bank president, said food prices are at “a tipping point”, having risen 36pc in the last year to levels close to their 2008 peak. The rising cost of food has been much more dramatic in low-income countries, pushing 44m people into poverty since June last year.

Another 10pc rise in food prices would push 10m into extreme poverty, defined as an effective income of less than $1.25 a day. Already, the world’s poor number 1.2bn.

Mr Zoellick said he saw no short term reversal in the damaging effect of food inflation, which is felt much more in the developing world as packaging and distribution accounts for a far larger proportion of the cost in the advanced economies.

Asked if he thought prices would remain high for a year, Mr Zoellick said: “The general trend lines are ones where we are in a danger zone… because prices have already gone up and stocks are relatively low.”

Rising prices have been driven by the changing diet of the ballooning middle classes in the emerging markets. “There is a demand change going on, with the higher incomes in developing countries. People will eat more meat products, for example, that will use more grain.

US consumer inflation gains most in 15 months
15 Apr 2011
Joblessness is biggest recovery threat
14 Apr 2011
BRICS warn over commodity prices
14 Apr 2011
China inflation jumps amid growth
15 Apr 2011
UK confidence picks up from record low
14 Apr 2011
China inflation threat underestimated
13 Apr 2011

“I am not suggesting that the improved diets in the developing world are the source of the problem but it means it takes longer to rebuild the stocks when you get a supply [shock].”
The problem has been exacerbated by “weather problems in Russia, Ukraine, North America, China”.
Making matters worse has been rising fuel prices, which go into fertilisers and energy.
However, he played down the impact of speculators on prices, saying only that “it can exacerbate some of the shifts”.
He also raised concerns about the food investment policies of some of the world’s wealthier nations in poorer countries. China has been buying up huge tracts of Africa to grow enough food to feed its growing middle class.
Using Saudi Arabia’s decision to scrap wheat production and invest overseas for food instead as an example, he said: “This raises sensitivities about the purchasing and investment and the land.
“We are now working with the Food and Agriculture Organisation on responsible principles for food investment – this has included sub-Saharan Africa, also some in central Asia – the idea that investment can be helpful and create additional food production, but one needs to do it in a way that helps the local people and meets local needs.”
The World Bank is investing $7bn in improving agricultural production, from seeds to irrigation to sewage. One key area of research is in developing better seeds.

Libya's Great Man-Made River

2011-04-15T14:15:00.000-07:00

By Stephen Lendman 4-15-11

A previous article explained that America's led NATO war on Libya was long-planned. All military interventions require months of preparation, including: -- strategy and conflict objectives; -- enlisting coalition partners; -- selecting targets; -- promoting political and public support; -- deploying troops; -- in Libya, recruiting, funding, and arming so-called rebels; and -- post-conflict imperial plans. Washington wants one despot replaced with another, a useful puppet to salute and obey orders, not independent-minded ones like Gaddafi who went along most often but not always on all issues, some major enough to want him ousted. An important overlooked one is discussed below. Other objectives are to colonize Libya, balkanize it like Yugoslavia and Iraq, prevent democracy from emerging, privatize its state enterprises, exploit its people, establish new Pentagon bases, and control its oil, gas and other resources, a key one getting little attention - Libya's Great Man-Made River (GMMR). The Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (NSAS) lies beneath four North African countries - Chad, Egypt, Sudan and Libya, called the world's largest fossil water system because it's ancient and non-renewable. In fact, the Qur'an's (Koran) Surah 2, Verse 74 says: "For among rocks there are some from which rivers gush forth; others there are which when split asunder send forth water." In fact, three major aquifers lie beneath the Sahara, NSAS the largest, containing an estimated 375,000 cubic km of water. Covering two million square km, it's an ocean of water beneath the desert for irrigation, human consumption, development, and other uses. At 2007 consumption rates, it could last 1,000 years. Gaddafi calls NSAS the "Eighth Wonder of the World." Its web site says it's the largest global underground network of pipes and aqueducts, consisting of: -- over 1,300 wells; -- 7 million miles of pre-stressed steel wire to strengthen 12-foot diameter pipes; -- 3,500 km of pipeline covering an area equal to Western Europe; -- four pipelines - two east and two west, connecting with links north; and -- thousands of miles of roads between and connecting its various lines and infrastructure, supplying 6.5 million cubic meters of fresh water daily to Libyans and others in the region. Extracting water at a depth of from 1,600 - 2,500 feet, the system purifies and supplies it mainly to populated coastal cities. Conceived in the late 1960s, feasibility studies were conducted in 1974. Construction then began in 1984, divided in five phases, each largely separate, then combined into an integrated system. Funded by Gaddafi without loans from other nations or Western banks, the project cost $25 billion so far. Inaugurated in August 1991, phase I provides two million daily cubic meters of water along a 1,200 km pipeline from As-Sarir and Tazerbo to Benghazi and Sirt, via the Ajdabiya reservoir. Phase II delivers one million daily cubic meters from the Fezzan region to the fertile Jeffara plain in the Western coastal belt, also supplying Tripoli. Phase III is in two parts. Its first adds an additional 1.68 million cubic meters daily through another 700 km of pipeline and pumping stations. It also supplies 138,000 more cubic meters daily to Tobruk and the coast from a new Al-Jaghboub wellfield through another 500 km of pipeline. The final phases involve extending the distribution network by pipelines linking the Ajjabiya reservoir to Tobruk, then connecting Eastern and Western systems at Sirt into a single integrated network. When fully operational, Gaddafi hopes to make the desert as green as Libya's flag. The project is owned by the Great Man-Made River (GMMR) Authority, funded by Gaddafi's government as explained above. However, with war raging, the system is jeopardized as well as Gaddafi's dream to turn the desert green. On April 3, AFP headlined, "Libya warns of disaster if 'Great Man-Made River' hit," saying: If GMMR is bombed, it could cause a "human and environmental disaster." Libya has three underground pipeline systems, for oil, gas, and water. If one is hit, the others are affected, potentially disastrously. According to project manager Abdelmajid Gahoud: "If part of the infrastructure is damaged, the whole thing is affected and the massive escape of water could cause a catastrophe," depriving millions of Libyans of fresh water, 70% of 6.5 people for human consumption, irrigation, and other purposes. Moreover, if Gaddafi is ousted, the enterprise will be privatized, making water unaffordable for many, perhaps most Libyans. In other words, neoliberal control will exploit it for maximum profits. A Final Comment On April 13, Ellen Brown's Truthout article headlined, "Libya: All About Oil, or All About Banking?" raised an important easily overlooked issue, saying: "Libyan rebels took time out from their rebellion in March to create their own central bank (the Central Bank of Benghazi)," suggesting others with sophisticated know-how had it on the shelf ready to go months earlier. A previous article quoted General Wesley Clark's book, "Winning Modern Wars," saying Pentagon sources told him two months after 9/11 that war plans were being prepared against Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Somalia, Sudan and Libya. "What do these seven countries have in common," asked Brown? None (as well as Afghanistan) are "listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements." It's the central bank for central bankers, a banking boss of bosses accountable to no government, privately owned by its members, the most powerful with most influence. Outliers, of course, put "them outside (its) long regulatory arm." Months before America attacked Iraq, Saddam Hussein began selling oil in Euros, not dollars, threatening its reserve currency and petrodollar dominance. Gaddafi "made a similarly bold move," an initiative toward replacing the dollar with "the gold dinar," hoping for "a united African continent (under) this single currency." Many Arab and African countries endorsed the idea, but not America or the West, "French President Nicolas Sarkozy calling (Gaddafi) a threat to the financial security of mankind." He wasn't deterred. Moreover, "the Central Bank of Libya is 100% State owned." In other words, it creates its own money, the Libyan Dinar, interest free to be used for productive economic growth, not profits and bonuses for predatory bankers. As a result, imperial Washington, Britain and France included Libya on their "globalist (hit list to integrate it into) its hive of compliant nations," at the expense of its own internal interests. They include oil and gas development, projects to make the desert green, as well as providing free education, healthcare, and other essential social services from oil revenues and Central Bank of Libya created money. "So, is this new war all about oil or all about banking," asked Brown? "Maybe both - and water as well," noting that with "energy, water and ample (interest-free) credit to develop the infrastructure to access them, a nation can be free (from) foreign creditors," especially predatory Western ones, entrapping countries in debt for greater profits. Perhaps that was Saddam's real threat, now Gaddafi's and other nations on the Pentagon's hit list. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/

Working away

2011-04-08T13:08:00.000-07:00

To all the good people who visit this blog, thank you, the stat counter keeps on rising so I know it IS worthwhile to keep posting items that expose the traitors and liars that purport to have our best interests at heart, yet are despicable scum, evil compassionless filth who be their very deeds go against what is good and right.

Thanks to the globalists and their current illusion, the 'recession', I am forced to take work that is at the other end of the country so my blog entries for the next few weeks will be a bit hit and miss. I shall try to update whenever I can, but access to the internet will be irregular and difficult, so please dont stop visiting, I will do my best!

God bless you all.

Excellent News: Cynicism At All-Time High. Elected Politicians Almost Universally Loathed...

2011-04-08T10:57:00.000-07:00

Kev Boyle, 'No one to vote for'

.
There was an encouraging article in today's Independent from Steve Richards, 'This loathing of politicians must end'.

......and there was me waiting for it to properly begin.

A newly elected MP tells him that "the hardest part of the job is coping with disdain of the public". Other M.P.'s seem to agree.

Well Steve, thanks for that. It is encouraging to know that there are so many that hold a positive reason for no longer voting. They despise the bl**dy lot of 'em.

The more cynicism and loathing the better, I say.

Maybe one day the penny will drop. Maybe one day the horrible so-and-so's that covet a soaring parliamentary career will understand why they are hated, see the light and start doing the right thing (for once).

These people drag us into a 'War On Terror' without demanding answers to (or even asking) the most obvious and crucial questions. The 'War On Terror' is an obvious hoax. There is definitive scientific evidence that proves it. There are even respected insider 'whistle-blowers' (listen to all this brilliant interview) that openly declare it.

Failure of our representatives to question 9/11 and 'The War on Terror' is nothing less than treason. It is an ultimate betrayal, the sacrifice of the lives of ones country's citizens to serve the interests of a banking oligarchy that increasing numbers of people understand to be our real government.

We notice that no MP has raised a squeak about the fact that there has been no Public Inquiry into the 7/7 London bombings, the biggest act of mass murder ever committed on British soil. What MP has raised a question or said a single word about the following:
1) A doctor who was sent onto two of the trains to 'count the dead' was one body short in both cases. If all the victims bodies are accounted for, where are the bodies of the alleged suicide bombers.?
2) The first expert on the scene said the explosions were timer-detonated and used high-grade military explosives. Now we have the ludicrous narrative of four mates in a Yorkshire gym buying tubs of hydrogen peroxide, boiling it down to the required concentration, mixing it with black pepper, filling containers with this stuff and traversing the country with this stuff sloshing around in their rucksacks, before making their bags explode to devastating effect on the morning of 7/7.
Do me a favour, guv. Apart from the fact that the explosives story is in its fourth incarnation since 7/7, to believe that you have to really NEED to believe it.......which, of course MP's do. Nonetheless they are not doing their jobs.
3) There have been three different train-times narratives before HMG settled on the latest version.
4) In spite of London being the most CCTV-rich environment on earth there are only a couple of very poor images to place the bombers in the right place at the right times and these could easily have been photoshopped. What was up with those thousands of CCTV cameras?
5) There were four drills carried out by authorities that almost perfectly mirrored the event itself. How spectacularly unlikely is it that this conflation of real and virtual 'terrorism' was random happenstance?
6)There were no post mortems carried out on any of the bodies. A shocking truth that can only be explained by somebody's desire not to create evidence that would possibly (or, more correctly, certainly) contradict other evidence that was, at that early time, yet to be fully concocted.
7) Lots and lots of other things. The reported lack of political or religious fervor of at least three of the four. Khan's role in his job (working in a special school) and with the police (as a negotiator and peacemaker between rival gangs). This man's previous habitual behaviour was as a healer and not a destroyer. He was even taken on a tour of parliament by his local MP. The fact they bought return tickets and Tanweer (who was playing cricket until 10pm the night before) argued about the change in the M1 Services on the way down to Luton. The fact Germaine Lindsay arrived early in Luton, fell asleep and got a parking ticket in Luton Station car park before the others arrived.

How relaxed is that for a guy who knows he will die in four hours time?

The fact that when he arrived (surely late) in King's Cross station he asked an attendant, a Mr Patel, if he could see the "Duty Manager" saying "It is very important" (Mr Patel reported that it was already chaotic on the concourse at this time with grills to the street having been pulled down, barriers closed, uniformed personnel moving around and passengers shouting at staff for being prevented from getting to work). Lindsay did not wait for the man to be brought to him. He disappeared.

This, and much else besides, sounds much more like the behaviour of a hired actor in a drill rather than a determined killer. As well-paid patsies, hired for the 'exercise', it is easy to imagine Khan and Tanweer being sweet-talked into making the 'threatening' videos that so effectively convinced most people of their guilt.

The Muslim community are not so dumb, however, nor many of the rest of us.

So, Mr Richards, if these anomalies had been noticed and raised by a single MP or media outlet we might still have a little respect for their and your collective integrity.

But NO.

It hasn't happened and it won't happen.

Because THERE IS NO INTEGRITY.

And this what everybody increasingly notices.

Morality is compartmentalised. It is applied sometimes and not others.

COMPARTMENTALISED MORALITY IS NO MORALITY AT ALL.

As a schoolteacher I had to get Health and Safety forms filled in every time children were taken across a road and every form had to be taken home by every child and parents' emergency mobile phone numbers filled in, 'in case something happens'. The same politicians who voted in this rubbish (because they care so much about children) were also responsible for giving the green light to the 'Shock and Awe' that murdered thousands of women and children in their beds at the start of the Iraq War.

So what is the unifying principle here?

It has certainly nothing to do with the well-being of children.

The unifying principle is discovered by asking this question, "What is in the interests of the international corporate finance?"

Answer: CONTROL AT HOME AND DESPOTISM ABROAD.

HERE IS THE SINGLE RULING PRINCIPLE OF GOVERNMENT.

EVERY POLICY, ALMOST WITHOUT FAIL, SERVES THE INTEREST OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCE. (show me one that doesn't). The financiers fund the think-tanks who create the policies for what we call government, of the left or right, it makes no difference.

At home, for western peoples, amongst whom these oligarchs lurk, we must get used to their governments installing endless systems designed to condition our subconscious minds into automatic and unthinking obedience.

Abroad, anything goes.

But hey, Steve, you and your mates were right about one thing.

We really are in Libya because we care about the safety of Libyans.

Repeat after me: We love Libyans soo, so much. We love Libyans soo, so much.We love Libyans soo, so much. We......

etc., etc.

So Steve, here we have it. For many of us the situation is now way beyond repair. The system itself is clearly at the very heart of our problems. Within it, even those who long for righteousness can do nothing.....or can I phrase this more correctly.....

THEY ARE NOT PREPARED TO SPEAK OUT BECAUSE THERE MIGHT BE PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES.

IF LARGE NUMBERS WITHIN THE SYSTEM (POLITICIANS, MEDIA, CHURCHES ans EDUCATORS) DEMANDED ANSWERS TO OBVIOUS QUESTIONS IT WOULD THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE A PROBLEM, NOT THE REST OF US.

But, hey, we bear some guilt too for putting up with the situation and the system.

A system whereby infinitely flexible law-making institutions are controlled by and for an elite (under the pretext of serving the interests of the people).

This is a system that follows the Talmudic model. This self-serving, morally cracked machinery and leadership was exactly what Christ condemned when he called its masters, the Pharisees (as they were then known) "of Satan".

Less than nothing has changed in this age of a new war per week.

More and more decent people, thankfully, perceive the political and media class as those who busy themselves weaving gold cloth from dense and poisonous turds. In the old days when our bodies willingly supported those garments, when we trusted the BBC and the 'better' newspapers, we could sometimes get a whiff of the stink but now the fabulous gossamer you weave before our eyes is, and will remain, nothing but, only, and definitively.....that turd.

We will never willingly don such clothes again.

Socialist Government Increasing its Control in Britain‏

2011-04-07T13:00:00.000-07:00

An article on CNBC reports: "The UK’s tax collection agency is putting forth a proposal that all employers send employee paychecks to the government, after which the government would deduct what it deems as the appropriate tax and pay the employees by bank transfer. The proposal by Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) stresses the need for employers to provide real-time information to the government so that it can monitor all payments and make a better assessment of whether the correct tax is being paid. Currently employers withhold tax and pay the government, providing information at the end of the year, a system know as Pay as You Earn (PAYE). There is no option for those employees to refuse withholding and individually file a tax return at the end of the year. If the real-time information plan works, it further proposes that employers hand over employee salaries to the government first."
And who wouldn’t mind the government getting its hands on ALL of you salary and delaying payday several days at a time when many people are living paycheck to paycheck?
The CNBC article notes "…The chance of widespread mistakes could be high…HMRC does not have a good track record of handling large computer systems and has suffered high-profile errors with data…The system would be massive in terms of data management, larger than a recent attempt to centralize the National Health Service’s data, which was later scrapped."
So your paycheck might just "disappear" thanks to the butterfingers of some government bureaucrat or they might deduct way too much, leaving you with a fraction of what you should have gotten.
The article goes on "If there’s a mistake and the HMRC collects too much money, the difficulty of getting it back could be high with repayments of tax taking weeks or months….HMRC estimated the potential savings to employers from the introduction of the concept would be about £500 million ($780 million)…But the cost of implementing the new system would be phenomenal…There is a further concern…The centralized storage of so much data poises a security risk as the system may be open to cyber crime."
Boy, wouldn’t that be a tempting target for some hi-tech version of the Great Train Robbery?
This new system would also make it easier to implement tax increases; why bother with Parliament when the Chancellor of the Exchequer can just call down to the computer room at the Revenue Commissioners and have some techie nerd tap a few new figures into the system on his keyboard?
This is yet another version of the old socialist dream, to have every citizen dependent on a check from the government and afraid to speak out or criticize for fear the government will retaliate in some way by messing with your money. A nice stick to hold over a populace to keep them in line, and a stick Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrats want to wield in the States
It’s difficult to remember that prior to World War Two, Great Britain was a free White country. Today, instead of seeing ruddy-cheeked people on the streets of London, you’ll see Muslims, Africans and Hindus. Cameras are mounted on every street corner much like Orwell’s book "1984″ so that government bureaucrats can spy on you anywhere and everywhere. And now the government wants to get control of your paycheck before "graciously" condescending to let you keep a fraction of the money you earned for doing your job. Fucking wankers.
Link HERE

Europe 'losing' superbugs battle

2011-04-07T12:40:00.000-07:00

By Michelle Roberts Health reporter, BBC News

The emergence of antibiotic-resistant infections has reached unprecedented levels and now outstrips our ability to fight it with existing drugs, European health experts are warning.

Each year in the EU over 25,000 people die of bacterial infections that are able to outsmart even the newest antibiotics.
The World Health Organization says the situation has reached a critical point.
A united push to make new drugs is urgently needed, it says.
Without a concerted effort, people could be dealing with the "nightmare scenario" of worldwide spread of untreatable infections, says the WHO.
One example is the New Delhi or NDM-1 superbug recently found in UK patients.
They brought the infection back with them from countries like India and Pakistan, where they had visited for medical treatment and cosmetic surgery.
Full story ...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12975693

_____________________________________________________________________________

A GREAT REASON TO STOP ALL THIRD WORLD IMMIGRATION IMMEDIATELY

Gerald Celente - World Renowned Trends Forcaster, as you have never heard him before - the warning!‏

2011-04-07T12:31:00.000-07:00

CHRISTIANS MUST WORK, LIKE CHRIST HIMSELF, TO CONVERT THE JEWS

2011-04-06T12:05:00.000-07:00

Kev Boyle (No One To Vote For)

We, the Christians of the world, believe that God was fully present in the spirit of the Jewish carpenter and teacher Jesus Christ. As Christians we must surely accept His teachings and attempt to imitate His actions.

His actions during His ministry were primarily praying, healing, preaching, the practice of self-sacrifice and pacifism (a habit from which he seems to have made one exception....when he took up "knotted cords" and drove the moneychangers from the temple).

There were two strands to his teaching.

Firstly, the 'Good News' about His Father in heaven. That God is a God of infinite love for his creation, that this love is accessible and that ecstatic union with and partaking of this Love is our intended destiny; that all who love God and do His Will will experience heaven after death and possibly before. That we must "love our enemies", "do good to those who persecute us" and "turn the other cheek" rather than seeking 'an eye for an eye' as previously taught. "We must become perfect as our Father in heaven". He taught that God was present in all men, the (hated) Samaritan more than the priest or Levite if that Samaritan's charity was greater than theirs.

Certainly He warned severely against denying God's Love, but His is a sublime and universal teaching. It is for ALL men.

In spite of this affirming universalism we must still remember that Christ came to the Jews. So secondly, His teaching was intended to lead the 'Children of Israel' away from the debauched, corrupted and wicked leadership that had usurped authority over the Jewish people and led them away from the religion of Abraham and Moses.

"Ye blind guides, who strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel!" (Matthew 23:24)

"If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. 43Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies." (John 8:42-44)

"Woe to you! For you build the tombs of the prophets, and it was your fathers who killed them." (Luke 11:47)

So Christ came to lead Jews away from the Pharisee Rabbis whose teaching was "of the Devil" and back to the One True God.

Therefore we surely must believe that the inheritors of the Mosaic tradition, todays true 'Children of Israel', are the followers of Christ.

It is certainly clear, from their own writings, that those who came after the Pharisees are still serving the same satanic master (see excerpts from 'The Talmud' below. The Pharisees started writing down their 'oral law' after the fall of the second temple in about 70 A.D.)

This 'Talmud' is the holy book of Orthodox Judaism. The most senior Talmudic Rabbis have developed a tradition of continually updating the written law in service of perceived current necessities but in reference to existing 'law'. This group, working alongside their allies-of-old, the money changers, have had a profound influence on all western societies and beyond. Our very parliamentary systems and processes of law creation are based on the Talmudic model. At all times we have a body of law carefully developed and thought out with intense intellectuality and a degree of moral oversight BUT, this law is:

1) Written by the masters of that society.

2) Enacted by a judiciary drawn from that elite.....not by common men with reference to much simpler 'Common Laws' (there are, effectively, only two of them. To do no harm to others and to honour ones promises), and

3) Infinitely adaptable in serving the perceived best interests of those writing the law.

So here is the skeleton on which hangs the corrupted flesh of our much adored 'Parliamentary Democracy'.

Here is why our collective morality is false and compartmentalised. Here is why you will be forced, as a teacher(say), to fill in Health and Safety forms every time you walk a child across a zebra crossing, yet the political authority that demands this behaviour of you, on a pretext of its profound care for children, will happily murder other children, by the tens if not hundreds of thousands, in their beds with 'shock and awe'.

There IS no integrity. 'Political correctness', 'human rights' legislation and the rest is phony. There is only self-interest....of the controlling or the rapacious kind.

Did Christ not educate us fully, not only in the saving of our souls, but also in the saving of our societies.

How little we listened.

Christ directed His great love at 'The Jews'. Should we not do the same?

Should we not pray for these poor deceived and misled dupes. Their Rabbis have bound them in chains within their tribe. They have been taught that God is only for them, that we (the rest of us) hate them and, at the drop of a hat, would kill them. Thus these Rabbis have manufactured an immense loyalty to their own controlling satanic clique.

Ordinary Jews are like the rest of us......only more so.

Fearful, self-referential, mistrusting but, most of all, deceived. The great danger for them, like ourselves, is a Godless life beyond life.

If we Christians love them, and we must,then we must pray for them and bring them the message of Christ. The Catholic Church used to have prayers at the end of every Mass "for the conversion of Russia" (code, surely, for the desired Christian enlightenment of the Bolsheviks, who were mostly Jews). We should return to such praying. Christians, all Christians must expose the true nature of Orthodox Talmudic teaching. We must expose its connection to Freemasonry, the international finance oligarchy and their satanic 'New World Order' agenda.

We look around us and see the living proof that all Christ's dire warnings are bringing the disaster he foretold, yet Christian churches do NOTHING, neither to save nor even to warn us.

Meanwhile the pope in Rome 'pardons the Jews for Jesus death'.

But not Orthodox Rabbis, nor the Lubavitchers nor any other Talmudist sect surely?

These people are still about the business of murdering Christ to this very day. Who on earth does this pope serve? As a practicing Roman Catholic this more than worries me. When Piers Compton, in 'The Broken Cross' alleges that the Vatican was taken over by Freemasons in 1958, I believe him. There really is no other explanation for this pope's creepy manoeuvres.

The spirit of Christ remains in the pews, in the houses, the yards and the fields and in the hearts of ordinary men, women and children and most of their ministers and priests.

Let us urge Jews to 'wake up' and smell the coffee that is the (mostly covert...Jews mostly don't get to read this stuff) religion of their Rabbinical masters. Let them join us as many have already and, with God's great power and grace, bring down the satanic leviathan that today dominates us all.

Few ordinary Jews would sign up to the below. They need to read their own Holy Book and say so. Such words from a large number of them might save us all.

TALMUD QUOTES

1. "It is more wicked to question the words of the rabbis than those of the Torah." -Michna Sanhedryn 11:3

2. "It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world." - Jektat Chadasz, 171, 3

3. "Every goy who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die." -Sanhedryn, 59a, aboda Zora 8-6, Szagiga 13

4. "To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly." -Libbre David 37 (no they wouldn't)

5. "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death." -Libbre David 37

6. "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim asks if our books contain anything against them." -Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Via 17

7. "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts..." -Saba Mecia 114, 6

8. "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves." -Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D

9. "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night." - Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L

10. "As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope's palace. Then He will start a merciless war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: 'I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the goyim.' " -Josiah 60, 6. Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13

11. "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated." -9boda Sarah 37

12. "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl." -&ad. Shas. 2:2

13. "A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat." -Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan 9ruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

14. "A Jew may misuse the non-Jewess in her state of unbelief." - Maimonides, Jak. Chasaka 2:2

15. "IF a goy kills a goy or a Jew he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy he is NOT responsible." -Tosefta. 9boda Za,-a 8, 5

16. "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces." -Schuichan Qruch, Choszen Hajpiszpat jog

17. "Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor (Bible), but it is not said, 'Thou shalt not do injury to a Goy.' " -Mishna Sanhedryn 57

18. "When you go to war do not go as the First, but as the last, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Kanaan recommended to his sons: 'Love each other, love the robbery, hate your masters and never tell the truth.' " -Pesachis F. 113B

19. "A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer." -Schulchan Aruch, Jore Dia

20. "A Jew may rob a goy - that is,.he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him." -Schalchan Arach, Choszen Hamiszpat 348

21. "If a goy wants a Jew to stand witness against a Jew in a Court of Law, and if the Jew could give fair evidence, he is forbidden to do it; but if a Jew wants a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a goy, he may do it." -Schalchan .9ruch, Choszen Hasiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4

22. "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general' " - Schalchan arach. Choszen Hasisxpat 348

23. "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day or reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, wear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all." -Schulchan 9ruch,

Edit. 1, 136. The Jewish Kol Nidre "All Vows" Oath has been set to a

morbid Jewish music, and is often heard on the radio. It is sung as a

chant at each Yom Kippur [Jewish New Year service September 17]

etc., etc.

MicroWave Weapons

2011-04-05T13:03:00.000-07:00

Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World – Charlotte Iserbyt

2011-04-05T12:57:00.001-07:00

How Zionist Media Sells Us Into War - The Truth About Libya

2011-04-04T14:03:00.001-07:00


By Gary Jacobucci 4-3-11

With the European Central Banks owning 99% of the U.S. media (control by proxy in that they provide the credit to their selected puppets for the multi billion dollar consolidations of U.S. business and resources), we are fed a constant stream of disinformation to sell the United States into supplying the troops and resources to the fulfill Central Banking agendas around the world.

The stratagem of owning the media is nothing new, but we need to get beyond the idea that America has a free press. In describing the medias participation in the selling of the U.S. into WWl, Congressman Oscar Callaway from Texas , entered this statement into the Congressional Record in 1917 (February 9, 1917, Vol. 54, pp. 2947-48.):

"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy if the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

(When J.P. Morgan passed away, he was thought to be worth billions and was found have only a few million to his family name - revealing himself to be just another puppet of the European Central Banking fraternity.)

The backward belief of many Middle Eastern nations that usury is a sin puts a big target on their backs in the eyes of the Rothschild led oligarchs that seek to use the global financial system to bring the entire world under their control.

The selling of the idea that we need Middle Eastern oil is nonsense. The U.S., like the rest of the world, is sitting of an ocean of oil but is kept 'secret'.

(As when the discovery was made off Gull Island and the D.O.E. flew in that night and 'classified' the discovery in the name of national security.)

An article by Steven Goodson on Friday shows the disconnect between what we are told and what is actually taking place in the Middle East. The point is not to promote the Middle Eastern brand of socialism, but to recognize that we are being systematically returned to colonial status by the same self proclaimed aristocratic oligarchy that has always lusted after empire.

It's a simple enough stratagem to conquer the world through a system of usury and created conflict (war).

One of the Rothschild's stated it in as few words as possible... "Control the money, control the world."

British Economist John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) put it this way... "There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic laws on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one in a million is able to diagnose."

Fortunately, it's being 'diagnosed' worldwide and the worm is turning.

Albert Pike stated the objective of war to the oligarchs (the right of wealth to rule get the nations to "fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion"

Gutle Schnaper, wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild's, gave an insight into the enormous power wielded by the House of Rothschild when she nonchalantly stated in 1849, shortly before her passing

"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."

The bottom line is that we have to stop being sold into usury and war.

- Gary

The Truth About Libya
By Stephen Goodson
4-1-11

Colonel Muammar Gadaffi is frequently referred to in the media as a "mad dictator" and "bloody tyrant", but do these allegations accord with the facts?

Libya consists of over 15O tribes, with the two main groups, the Meghabra living in Tripolitania in the west and the Wafallah living in Cyrenaica in the east. Previous attempts to unite these tribes by the Turkish (1855-1911) and ltalian {1911-43) colonial rulers failed and the country was split in two for administrative purposes.

Oil was discovered in Libya in 1959, but King ldris of the Senussi tribe allowed most of the oil profits to be siphoned into the coffers of the oil companies. The coup d'etat on 1 September 1969 led by Colonel Gadaffi had countrywide support. He subsequently married a woman from the royal Barqa tribe and adroitly unified the nation.

By retaining Libya's oil wealth for the benefit of all its people, Gadaffi had created a socialist paradise. There is no unemployment, Libya has the highest GDP in .Africa, less than 5% of the population is classified as poor and it has fewer people living below the poverty datum line than for example in Holland. Life expectancy is 75 years and is the highest in Africa and I0% above the world average.

With the exception of the nomadic Bedouin and Tuareg tribes, most Libyan families possess a house and a car. There is free health care and education and not surprisingly Libya has a literacy rate of 82%. Last year Gadaffi distributed $500 to each man, woman and child (population 6.5 million).

Libya has a tolerable human rights record and stands at 61 on the International Incarceration Index, comparable with countries in central Europe (the lower the rating, the lower the standing - the USA occupies the no.1 spot!). There is hardly any crime and only rebels and traitors are dealt with harshly.

Anyone who has read Gadaffi's little Green Book will realize that he is a thoughtful and enlightened leader. Libya has been accused of having committed numerous acts of terrorism in the past, but many of these have been perpetrated by foreign intelligence agencies as false flag operations - the Lockerbie bombing being a prime example.

The CIA and MI6 and their frontmen have been stoking up dissent in the east of the country for almost 30 years. Libya produces exceptionally high quality light crude oil and its production cost of $1 a barrel, compared to the current price of $115, is the lowest in the world.

Riba (usury) is not permitted. The Central bank of Libya is a wholly-owned by the Libyan Government and is run as a state bank, issuing all government loans free of interest. This is in contrast to the exploitative fractional reserve banking system of the West. The no-fly zone and the bombing of Libya have nothing to do with the protection of civilians. It is an act of war - a blatant and crude attempt by the oil corporations and international bankers to steal the wealth of Libya.

We can protect a mob in Benghazi, so why not a little girl in Stockwell?

2011-04-03T10:09:00.000-07:00

Why does the British Government care more about protecting civilians in Libya than it does about protecting them in Britain?
In this week alone a tiny little girl and an innocent shopkeeper have been shot and badly wounded in the London suburb of Stockwell, within sight of the Palace of Westminster. They were caught in the crossfire of a gang war.

About 50 criminal gangs are said to be active in this area, and many of them are armed with guns, which our vaunted strict firearms laws have somehow failed to keep out of their hands.

And no help comes. The police sit on their fat backsides waiting for bad things to happen and then rush round too late. The courts strain to avoid sending wrongdoers to prison.

The prisons are run by the criminals, who get angry when warders try to deny them drugs and alcohol.

Ultra-violence and homicide are now so common that its perpetrators are often free after a few short years detained with a pool-table and lots of free methadone at the taxpayer’s expense.

The idea of protecting us – the civilians of Britain – with a proper patrolling police force, severe justice and the effective deterrent of the death penalty is rejected with shuddering horror by the comically misnamed Conservative Party that dominates the Government.

And such suggestions are regarded as positively wicked by the Liberal Democrats who sustain the Coalition.

Even those of them who pretend to believe in the death penalty will say: ‘But what if
an innocent person got killed by mistake?’

Yet when it comes to Libya the same people suddenly lose all their doubts. They’ll protect Libyan civilians by dropping tons of high explosive on anyone who attacks them. If innocent people are killed by mistake, and they have been and will be,
that is ‘collateral damage’, sad but acceptable.

They have obviously discussed killing Colonel Gaddafi because of his undoubted crimes against humanity. But they won’t hang a British murderer for his crimes against us.
Why do this miserable bunch of vain poseurs have to go to North Africa to do justice?
Why are they more interested in helping an Islamic mob in Benghazi than in protecting the British people who pay their huge wages? Why can’t justice begin at home?

Peter Hitchens

Satanist Insider Gloats Over Dire Prospects

2011-04-02T14:48:00.000-07:00

April 1, 2011

"It is again time to reallocate the wealth of the world. We are doing this through an economic depression the likes, depth and suffering of which no one has yet seen."

Gaping at the Dapper Men
With Derby Hats & Canes.

[Disclaimer: We do not endorse this viewpoint but present it for informational value. For example, AJF attributes atrocities like Hiroshima to Christians when they were carried out by his satanist precursors.]

by A.J. Fozdyke
(for henrymakow.com)

The Alpha Lodge and its system of Magick have helped many individuals to advance towards their Godhead. In this we continue to use the dregs of society to achieve Our aims. So what? Doesn't everybody?

Currently it is again time to reallocate the wealth of the world. We are doing this through an economic depression the likes, depth and suffering of which no one has yet seen. Think of the Great Depression only more so: longer and deeper. But we will never wholly rid ourselves of the herd, because that would yield a poor return on Our investments. Try to imagine the agony and ecstasy of Our will to be; the Usher of Desecration and the coming of Vindex.

Honestly I feel some compassion. Aiwass states in Liber Al "...Compassion is the vice of kings: stamp down the wretched & the weak: this is the law of the strong: this is our law and the joy of the world."

And I am a King to my Prince! That said, humanity desperately needs to be cleansed and freed from the worthless, the wretched and the weak. I have lived a truly great life and yet I feel the weight of my years. My Deities have given me many things. I honestly have no regrets of which to speak. I feel like I'm living a prophecy. Not a biblical prophecy, but one based on forethought and unadulterated truth.

'Now is my time to seek the glory of my Gods that I may one day walk with Satan, in His world and with His bride.'

What's happening in Libya is a diversion. People are being tortured and killed in the Gaza Strip but no one gives a damn about that, do they? It's called cognitive dissonance or the cataract of denial. Same in Japan.

Everyone is worried about radiation but no one mentions Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Hardly anyone knows that Xtains dropped the bombs on Japan more than six months after the Japanese government was desperately trying to end the war. Those who followed their loving saviour couldn't drop 'the bomb' on white people.

In Libya what's going on is a stage show to hide what's happening in Saudi Arabia and it's all about oil and the American dollar. And just by the by, it won't save the dollar and America is doomed. We organized that by giving the plebes what they want. Although the masses hate the thought of being controlled, most wish to be controlled. Freedom, power and sovereignty are only words to them!

It's O.K. when followers of the 2000 years dead, gay, Jewish bastard torture, maim, kill and engage in unspeakable acts of pointless cruelty, but somehow we of the left-hand path are evil! It's the will of Ialdabaoth when Palestinian kids are incinerated with white phosphorous bombs or Japanese babies were vaporized by nukes, but it's evil when we exploit, initiate and sacrifice! Yours is a hate filled, vengeful deity killing all before him, babies included: see Leviticus 26:16-39 or Joshua 7:19-26.

Our Prince is a realistic God who answers those which call upon Him. He is 'contradictory defiance: challenging in its purest...archetypal, shape-shifting form. His is the forbidden fascination that creates, nourishes, destroys and redeems. The Prince of the Earth, the Lord of the Air, the Darkness of the Deep, and the God of Fire! The terrifying and majestic Other, reflected in the unimaginable.'

We give the filth what they whim that they want! The Manipulators of the Alpha Lodge are some of the most obsequious, kind and helpful individuals you'll ever meet. We help the sheeple firm up their ideals and notions until these are so rigid they can be broken like glass.

The best way to control is through co-operation. In America we gave them the lightweight Kenyan as a precursor to the one who's coming. And we'll continue to give them the presidents they want.

In Australia we let the white trash think they chose Julia, but she isn't even their prime minister and Australia has no valid parliament. This was orchestrated in order for the Australian government to be more easily manipulated by those that we're kept in the loop.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s42.html

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/sch1.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HUyut-wPbg

It's all in the open! There's less reason to hide. Do Aussies care? They're too interested in another Royal wedding. You think that we're not intimately associated with the British establishment and royal family? You think Churchill the Druid wasn't in our hands? The war is now almost over. There is and will be no opposition to; no battles against Our future. We control the political parties; the economists; the educational curricula; the media and many of the evangelical churches. If I was stupid enough to name some names I wouldn't be believed anyway. The young are already Ours.

Sheeple don't play to win. They have been dealt cards to a circus act game they don't know how to play, so they act safe whilst feeling morally superior to the winners: irrational beings capable of semi-rational thought. Their strength is a function of their morality: the more they have, the weaker they are.

One of Our axioms is that even if you tell the truth, perhaps because you tell the truth, no one will believe you. The masses have a strong, but nurtured, imagination coupled with the inability to distinguish the existential conditions of their lives from their hopes, fears, wishes and dreams. The common man is a domesticated primate who lives (if you can call it that) in Limbo. We control the zoo.

By working tirelessly, quietly, secretively and intelligently the disciples of the world and the apostles of apostasy can finally taste the culmination of their dreams. The idealist will always lose to the men and women of passion and commitment with a goal. The idealist works for the 'right' reasons, but we enjoy Our work. The future stretches before Us as Our Prince's.

We will seek Our happiness in victory but never in peace!

Sucker punch-vile, satanic, hollywood bilge

2011-04-01T00:45:00.000-07:00

Girl power? No thanks: Sleazy and mindless, Sucker Punch takes Hollywood's love of moronic, sexualised violence to a new low

Verdict: Soul-suckingly putrid
Rating:
The publicity for Sucker Punch promises that ‘You will be unprepared’ and that at least is true.
I was unprepared for a film so pretentious, humourless yet laughable that it seems to have been made for 15-year-old boys by a sad middle-aged man whose only experience of life is from violent comics, shoot-’em-up video games and online pornography.

Chris Tookey says he was unprepared for a film so pretentious, humourless yet laughable that it seems to have been made for 15-year-old boys by a middle-aged man

Even at a time of year after the Oscars when Hollywood studios traditionally bring out their dead — movies that will neither conquer the box office nor win awards — Sucker Punch dives to a new low in sleazy, distasteful film-making.
It resembles Inception in one sense: it takes place on three levels of reality. In the first, a blank-faced girl called Baby Doll (Emily Browning) is raped by her paedophile stepfather (Gerald Plunkett), blamed for the murder of her little sister and committed to an abusive mental institution.

In the asylum, populated by transparently sane, alluring females aged between 17 and 25, Baby Doll is treated by a Polish psychotherapist in Dusty Springfield’s old eye make-up and Cher’s cast-off clothing (Carla Gugino, dreadful), brutalised by a sex-crazed orderly (Oscar Isaac, worse) and lobotomised by a surprised-looking Jon Hamm (inexplicable).
To cope with her seemingly redundant lobotomy, Baby Doll enters parallel reality 2, where she imagines herself and the other inmates — the way all victims of sexual and medical abuse do — as scantily-clad erotic dancers, choreographed by Ms Gugino in a seedy nightclub run by Mr Isaac. This comes across as a tackier version of Burlesque. No, really.

Girl power? Emily Browning stars as 'Babydoll' in the fantasy action film

We never get to see any dancing — probably because the film-makers want a 12A certificate, but ostensibly because each time Baby Doll starts to move, she and the other girls are transported for no obvious reason into parallel reality 3.
Here they are briefed by a Charlie’s Angels-type patriarch (Scott Glenn, doing a visibly bored impression of the late David Carradine) and given homespun homilies such as: ‘Don’t write a check with your mouth you can’t cash with your ass.’ Mr Glenn drops them into various surreal landscapes, which look like the imaginings of a 14-year-old boy with attention deficit syndrome, where these wannabe Lara Crofts kick the butts of giant Samurai warriors, disfigured Nazi zombies and some exceptionally dreary killer robots.
There is no tension about any of these battles, as the girls are pretty much invincible and the villains are unmotivated killing machines.
Still, here at last is conclusive proof that it is possible to make a noisy film packed with scantily-clad girls blowing things up, and still bore an audience. I’m happy to defend good comic-strip movies, like Spiderman 2, Men In Black and the first 75 minutes of Scott Pilgrim Vs The World. I’m also a fan of cinematic expressionism when — as in Fight Club, Shutter Island or Black Swan — it has something to express.
But not only do director Zack Snyder and his co-writer Steve Shibuya have nothing to say, the way they say it makes the excesses of The Last Airbender, Showgirls and Transformers look tasteful.

Influences: Tookey says Sucker Punch resembles Inception in the sense that it takes place on three levels of reality

This is an orgy of aggressive vacuity. These guys are not only talentless and unimaginative, they’re proud of it. They probably think they’re being post-modernist.
The BBFC’s 12A certificate is further discredited by this brazenly masturbatory fantasy, and one can only hope its sleazy subtext is unclear to any children who are mistakenly made to endure it. By putting his actresses in high heels, short skirts, bustiers and fishnet tights, Snyder’s voyeuristic direction undermines his pretence of female-empowerment.
The ending is particularly pathetic. I am not giving away anything important by saying the protagonist changes abruptly to an unimportant subsidiary character, the principal villain goes unpunished, and the heroine ends up even more characterless than she is in the rest of the movie.
Snyder proved conclusively in Watchmen and Legends Of The Guardians: The Owls Of Ga-Hoole that he hasn’t a clue about coherent storytelling.
Here, he has amazingly been allowed to squander $85 million, plus publicity costs, on a movie that will forever exemplify early 21st-century cinema at its mindless, excessive, hypocritical worst.
The most astonishing aspect is that Warner Brothers ever greenlit this monstrous turkey, undoubtedly one of the most tacky and moronic ever perpetrated. Who’s in charge of commissioning movies there these days? Charlie Sheen?

Action role: Vanessa Hudgens arrives at the Los Angeles Sucker Punch premiere, in which she plays one of Baby Doll's fantasy characters

Black Inventors - Dr. William Luther Pierce

2011-03-31T00:50:00.001-07:00

Seth Bekenstein (Walnut Creek, CA) - Dr. William Luther Pierce

2011-03-31T00:46:00.001-07:00

Army of "Schindler's" - Scott Roberts

2011-03-31T00:44:00.000-07:00

London set to limit right to protest

2011-03-30T10:02:00.000-07:00

Like we didnt know this was coming...

Press TV
March 30, 2011
The British government has announced controversial plans to ban protesters from taking part in public gatherings following the weekend anti-cuts rallies, which were marred by violence.
Based on a proposal by Home Secretary Theresa May, the police may be given new powers to prevent so-called hooligans from attending rallies and marches while officers will also be authorized to force demonstrators, who do not want to be known, to remove their face-scarves and balaclavas.
The announcement has raised concerns among MPs who say no hasty decision should be made on the issue as the police may abuse the “stop and search” powers to target ordinary people rather than “known hooligans”.
May outlined her plans during an emergency Commons briefing on the violent incidents, which marred the Saturday rally organized by the Trades Union Congress.
May told the MPs that she is considering “banning orders” similar to those used against football hooligans for the demonstrators who police thinks may turn to violence.
She also said officers should force more protestors to remove their masks and balaclavas to help the police quickly identify participants in the rallies.

“Just as the police review their operational tactics, so the Home Office will review the powers available to the police. I have asked the police whether they need further powers to prevent violence before it occurs. I am willing to consider powers which would ban known hooligans from rallies and marches and I will look into the powers the police already have to force the removal of face-coverings and balaclavas,” May said.
While the Metropolitan Police earlier said it has charged 149 people out of more than 200 arrested during the Saturday rallies with various offenses, at least five people have lodged complaints with Scotland Yard about police violence against marchers.
The Met said on Monday that it has charged 138 people in connection with the sit-in at Fortnum & Mason luxury store for charges including aggravated trespass.
However, the UK Uncut, which organized the sit-in dismissed any claims that those participating in the Fortnum & Mason incident resorted to violence.
“This was not a protest by people wearing balaclavas and breaking things. It was a peaceful and mild-mannered gathering by people from all walks of life – teachers, hospital workers, charity workers,” said Tim Matthews, a spokesman for UK Uncut.
“People who took part now find themselves charged with a criminal offence simply for exercising their right to protest,” he added.
This come as Tom Brake MP, co-chair of the Liberal Democrat parliamentary policy committee on home affairs, justice and equalities warned the government against “a knee-jerk reaction” to what happened.

“Clearly there was a small minority who were out to cause trouble. We need to look in detail into whether the police have sufficient powers to tackle that, or whether they can be deployed differently to ensure such violent scenes don’t happen again,” Brake said.

Alex Jones: Al-Qaeda created by CIA

2011-03-30T09:44:00.001-07:00

Wow That Was Fast! Libyan Rebels Have Already Established A New Central Bank Of Libya

2011-03-30T09:15:00.000-07:00

The Economic Collapse

March 29, 2011

The rebels in Libya are in the middle of a life or death civil war and Moammar Gadhafi is still in power and yet somehow the Libyan rebels have had enough time to establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company. Perhaps when this conflict is over those rebels can become time management consultants. They sure do get a lot done. What a skilled bunch of rebels - they can fight a war during the day and draw up a new central bank and a new national oil company at night without any outside help whatsoever. If only the rest of us were so versatile! But isn't forming a central bank something that could be done after the civil war is over? According to Bloomberg, the Transitional National Council has "designated the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and the appointment of a governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi." Apparently someone felt that it was very important to get pesky matters such as control of the banks and control of the money supply out of the way even before a new government is formed.

Of course it is probably safe to assume that the new Central Bank of Libya will be 100% owned and 100% controlled by the newly liberated people of Libya, isn't it?
Most people don't realize that the previous Central Bank of Libya was 100% state owned. The following is an excerpt from Wikipedia's article on the former Central Bank of Libya....

The Central Bank of Libya (CBL) is 100% state owned and represents the monetary authority in The Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and enjoys the status of autonomous corporate body. The law establishing the CBL stipulates that the objectives of the central bank shall be to maintain monetary stability in Libya , and to promote the sustained growth of the economy in accordance with the general economic policy of the state.

Since the old Central Bank of Libya was state owned, it was essentially under the control of Moammar Gadhafi.
But now that Libya is going to be "free", the new Central Bank of Libya will be run by Libyans and solely for the benefit of Libyans, right?
Of course it is probably safe to assume that will be the case with the new national oil company as well, isn't it?
Over the past couple of years, Moammar Gadhafi had threatened to nationalize the oil industry in Libya and kick western oil companies out of the country, but now that Libya will be "free" the people of Libya will be able to work hand in hand with "big oil" and this will create a better Libya for everyone.
Right?
Of course oil had absolutely nothing to do with why the U.S. "inva---" (scratch that) "initiated a kinetic humanitarian liberty action" in Libya.
When Barack Obama looked straight into the camera and told the American people that the war in Libya is in the "strategic interest" of the United States, surely he was not referring to oil.
After all, war for oil was a "Bush thing", right? The Democrats voted for Obama to end wars like this, right? Surely no prominent Democrats will publicly support this war in Libya, right?
Surely Barack Obama will end the bombing of Libya if the international community begins to object, right?
Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize. He wouldn't deeply upset the other major powers on the globe and bring us closer to World War III, would he?
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has loudly denounced "coalition strikes on columns of Gaddafi's forces" and he believes that the U.S. has badly violated the terms of the UN Security Council resolution....

"We consider that intervention by the coalition in what is essentially an internal civil war is not sanctioned by the U.N. Security Council resolution."

So to cool off rising tensions with the rest of the world, Obama is going to call off the air strikes, right?
Well, considering the fact that Obama has such vast foreign policy experience we should all be able to rest easy knowing that Obama will understand exactly what to do.
Meanwhile, the rebels seem to be getting the hang of international trade already.
They have even signed an oil deal with Qatar!
Rebel "spokesman" Ali Tarhouni has announced that oil exports to Qatar will begin in "less than a week".
Who knew that the rag tag group of rebels in Libya were also masters of banking and international trade?
We sure do live in a strange world.
Tonight, Barack Obama told the American people the following....

"Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different."

So now we are going to police all of the atrocities in all of the other countries around the globe?
The last time I checked, the government was gunning down protesters in Syria.
Is it time to start warming up the Tomahawks?
Or do we reserve "humanitarian interventions" only for those nations that have a lot of oil?
In fact, atrocities are currently being committed all over Africa and in about a dozen different nations in the Middle East.
Should we institute a draft so that we will have enough young men and women to police the world with?
We all have to be ready to serve our country, right?
The world is becoming a smaller place every day, and you never know where U.S. "strategic interests" are going to be threatened next.
The rest of the world understands that we know best, right?
Of course the rest of the world can surely see our good intentions in Libya, can't they?
Tensions with Russia, China and the rest of the Arab world are certainly going to subside after they all see how selfless our "humanitarian intervention" has been in Libya, don't you think?
In all seriousness, we now live in a world where nothing is stable anymore. Wars and revolutions are breaking out all over the globe, unprecedented natural disasters are happening with alarming frequency and the global economy is on the verge of total collapse.
By interfering in Libya, we are just making things worse. Gadhafi is certainly a horrible dictator, but this was a fight for the Libyan people to sort out.
We promised the rest of the world that we were only going to be setting up a "no fly zone". By violating the terms of the UN Security Council resolution, we have shown other nations that we cannot be trusted and by our actions we have increased tensions all over the globe.
So what do all of you think about what is going on in Libya? Please feel free to leave a comment with your opinion below....

J. Bruce Campbell at veteranstoday.com

2011-03-29T12:04:00.000-07:00

JB Campbell: DAJA

Are you aware that it is against the law in this country (America) for an American to ask if a product comes from Israel? That it is against the law for an American to answer that question, yea or nay? That it is against the law for anyone asked that question not to report the offender to the FBI or Department of Justice? That the penalty for asking, answering or not reporting is up to five years in federal prison and fines equaling five times the cost of the product or $15,000, whichever is higher?

Back in 2003, when this story first broke, the feds had already collected over 26 million dollars in fines from American violators of this law. By now, eight years later, I don’t know how much more they’ve collected under this law, part of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, gifted to us by a senator named Abraham Ribicoff, or to whom they gave the money.

I’m pretty sure you weren’t aware of that law.

You might be aware of a law just passed in Israel in their so-called parliament that requires the punishment of anyone, anywhere, who questions the origin of an Israeli product, or who calls for a boycott of Israel or of anything made in Israel. Punishment not specified, of course. I do know that in 2003, the Mossad made several efforts to kill me, for one thing or another, and came close. You could say I have a dog in this fight, to quote Mel Gibson. I am prejudiced – no question. I really hate the sons of bitches.

So, I’m going to get more serious about starting a political party to deal with the sons of bitches, something I suggested a few months ago and then got busy and let go.

We all need to recognize that Judaism is at war with everyone. Jewish teachers regard everyone as prey to be plundered and/or killed.

When Jews are in total control of a country (Russia, Hungary, Ukraine, Palestine), see how they treat others. In America, look at the areas in which they are in total control (Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, Hollywood, psychiatry, clothing, etc). All of them are in ruins or farmed out to slave labor countries.

There is no exception to this rule. Jews have seized control of all critical elements of our society: government, banking & finance, the military, education, information & entertainment, publishing, medicine and Christianity.

We are currently at war in four countries with people whom the Jews hate: the Moslems. This is only because of the total Jewish control of the US government. The Jews, led by orthodox Jew Joseph Lieberman, now intend for us to go to war with a fifth country, Syria, en route to their ultimate target, Iran.

Our “War on Terror” is American war on victims of Jewish aggression resulting from Jewish control of American politicians. Americans are also victims of Jewish aggression with the “PATRIOT ACT,” devised by Michael Chertoff, who is now profiting from the forced use of radioactive X-ray machines in virtually all US airports.

The nuclear bomb was a Jewish invention. It was dropped on helpless Japanese civilians whose government had been trying to surrender for several years following their defeat at Midway. It is the ultimate example of Jewish terror. Israel now admits that it possesses hundreds of nuclear weapons and is prepared to incinerate Europe if Jewish demands are resisted.

A Jewish-devised, extremely destructive computer worm called “Stuxnet” was unleashed last year on the Iranian nuclear reactor at Bushear to disable its water-cooling procedure. This infection spread to the Chinese and Japanese reactors by last October and reportedly is the reason the Japanese reactors are unable to keep their stored fuel rods under water and cool since the earthquakes and tsunami.

The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, has apparently recognized the cause of the Japanese nuclear meltdowns and has wisely begun shutting down the German nuclear energy system. Germany also distinguished itself recently by voting for the first time against Israel in the United Nations regarding the homicidal lunatic “settlers.” The immediate consequence was that her new twin-rotor helicopter experienced unprecedented flame-outs in both engines and narrowly avoided a crash due only to the skill of her pilots.

Dimitri Khalezov, the former Soviet nuclear security officer, has revealed that the terrorist attack of 9/11 was conducted by the infamous Israeli assassin, Michael Harari, exploiting the nuclear demolition plan for the WTC proposed decades earlier by Controlled Demolition, Inc and triggered by the attack on the Pentagon by a Soviet-era Granit cruise missile carrying a 500 kiloton nuclear warhead that was either purposely or accidentally deactivated. Harari and Khalezov were “friends” leading up to 9/11 and Dimitri was told by a very satisfied Harari the next day that he had organized the entire massacre.

These are just a few of the latest examples of Jewish aggression. The main problem is Jewish control of the US government, which is the only thing over which we have some control. We Americans really can’t do anything about Israel but we can attack and destroy Jewish organizations in America that create US domestic and foreign policies that provide Israel with money, weapons and orders to attack Moslems.

These organizations are the Council on Foreign Relations (70% Jewish), B’nai B’rith (the Jews-only Masonic lodge), AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, the World Zionist Organization as well as a number of others. Now, it is more than possible that there is a super-organization that gives orders to these visible organizations. When we have the names and addresses of the super-members, we can deal with them if they live in America. America must become an extremely unsafe place to live and operate for these people. Until then, we shall be quite content to deal with the memberships of the visible groups that have chosen to make US policy in our name without the formality of being elected or appointed by us to do so. They must be shown that there is a risk involved in usurping power and calling it “democracy.” We can play that game, too, once we learn the rules. The rules are: We’re under the law of the gun.

There is no “rule of law” in America anymore. Judges are crooked tinhorns who forbid the mention of the Bill of Rights in their “courtrooms.” We have the same rights in the US legal system as Palestinians have in Israel, all because of the Judaization of the law, and exhibit one for this accusation is the recent addition of the “Southern Poverty Law Center” to the “Department of Homeland Security.” The SPLC has been an arm of Israel’s Mossad since its inception and bragged that it was monitoring Timothy McVeigh for two years before OKC. In other words, McVeigh was run by Morris “Seligman” Dees, the millionaire poverty lawyer who is dedicated to the destruction of all American resistance groups.

Think about it: the Southern Poverty Law Center says it knew all about Tim McVeigh and how dangerous he was for two years before OKC! It knew about his movements around the country, posing as a white racist selling The Turner Diaries, it knew all about his telephone calling cards and his aliases. The SPLC was working with the FBI’s Dave Holloway and Andreas Strassmeir and Dennis Mahon and the other federal stooges and bank robbers at Elohim City.

But it must have known that McVeigh was working for the CIA’s Covert Tactical Unit and maybe even for the FBI’s Larry Potts (according to Terry Nichols). Despite frantic and specific warnings from ATF informants Carol Howe and Cary Gagan of a bomb plot against the Murrah Building, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the ATF and FBI let it happen. Even though the bomb squads were sent in the night before, they didn’t prevent workers and their kids from going into the building that morning! Can you beat that?

And now the Southern Poverty Law Center is part of the Department of Homeland Security.

The law of the gun. It’s appropriate, if you think about it. This is, after all, America – the land of frontier justice, Colt, Winchester and Remington, S&W and so many others. But “law enforcement” in this country has become a dirty joke, as it always does where Jews are in charge. How could it be otherwise with an Israeli citizen such as Michael Chertoff in charge of “Homeland Security?” Or Janet Napolitano (mother’s name: Winer), who went to college on a “Jewish scholarship.”

We must have a political party, perhaps called DAJA, for Defense Against Jewish Aggression. We wouldn’t participate in elections or send people to Washington or anywhere else. It would just be a party of resistance to Judaism. But we need a way to identify and communicate with ourselves and to eliminate police informants, of which there will be many, though perhaps not at first. This would be a counter-terror party. I have some experience in this as a former member of the Rhodesian counter-terror group known as Support Unit and as the one who started the American counter-terror movement known as the militia.

As I have written in these pages, the Rhodesian terrorists were supported by the state of Israel, among others, including the World Council of Churches.

Judaism is based on terror and deception, as we can easily confirm by reading the Jewish books starting with the Old Testament, then what we can stand to read in the Talmud and of course the ghastly Jewish Protocols. Anyone who claims the Protocols are “forgeries” or not authentic is mistaken. They are confirmed by comparing them with the Talmud or with Leviticus or Deuteronomy or Esther or the Sanhedrin’s letter to the Jews of Spain in 1492. It is the same philosophy of hatred, down through the ages. No other group of people has ever had such a continuing program of mass murder and control of people nor followed it so closely, beginning in Russia in 1918, following the 1917 Jewish revolution.

Judaism is not a religion as we know it, something based on faith, hope and charity or on a benevolent deity. It’s more a harsh set of racial laws. The Jewish god, Yahweh, is a god of war and annihilation, a merciless god. Jewish holidays are celebrations of military victories, hardly to be called “religious.” Non-Jews (the humans) do not recognize this fact of life until it is too late.

Now, the ironic thing is that the so-called Jews are connected in no way to the Hebrews of the Old Testament nor to the ones who supposedly got Jesus crucified by the Romans, except by role-playing.

Personally, I’m what’s called a heathen, not a believer in any of that legendary material anyway. The Jews with whom we live today are playing roles as Jews and some of them are such fanatics that they pretend to take credit for having Jesus killed. They know that this throws Christians into confusion, because the Christians are taught that Jews are special, that they are “God’s chosen people.” So Christians have never been able to deal with these ersatz-Jews, obviously. How do you deal with God’s favorites when they attack you? With total paralysis?

Christianity has been the number one, most-effective weapon in the Jews’ arsenal. It is the reason we have been so unsuccessful against them for over a century. The Moslems have a similar problem, respecting Judaism as they do as “the senior service.” Even though the Zionists are not Hebrews – they’re mostly Russian and European “Jews” – wherever they live – the Moslems are somewhat paralyzed by their religion in dealing with them. So religion is the problem, not the solution.

Before a person can resist Judaism he must shed his Christian or Moslem mind control. I view Christianity as the main problem of Americans rather than Judaism. It’s not that Americans are such believers in Christianity, it’s that the Christianity which almost all of us were exposed to as children has left a residual confusion about resisting Jewish aggression. Christianity does not really allow self-defense. It preaches forgiveness and salvation and all that passive, goody-two-shoes thinking – pie in the sky in the sweet bye and bye. That’s one problem. The political part – the special nature of the fake-Hebrews that is defined in their writings and historical and current depredations – is another problem. All this has to be addressed and rejected if we are going to survive.

Enough history and philosophy. Defense against Jewish aggression means first admitting we have a Jewish problem! We cannot solve this problem by voting or by reporting them to the police. The vote machines are rigged and the police are controlled by the Anti-Defamation League and the SPLC.

The militia movement was just that: a movement. A state of mind. There was no militia unit to join, unless you just started some outfit with your friends. It was an anti-government state of mind, a willingness to say “no” to the homicidal Bush queers and the homicidal Clinton queers and their vicious attempts at gun control. The more Liberace Bush talked about the New World Order, the more Hilary the dyke did at and after Waco, the bigger the militia movement got. It got so big that ex-CIA director Bill Colby said it would have to be dealt with – “justly or otherwise.”

The militia movement just wasn’t ready for Oklahoma City.

Today, 2011, I believe American men are hardened up mentally for whatever. We’ve seen just how bad the US military is after ten years of American war crimes and mass murder of totally innocent people overseas. We know these guys are capable of anything, that a lot of them are so messed up by their Jewish brainwashing (Abu Ghraib and Gitmo and much more) that they can be aimed at us just as quickly as they were aimed at the Moslems, who never threatened them in the slightest.

We’ve got horrible problems with our Jewish money system (the Fed) and our Jewish financial system (Wall Street). We’ve got a lethal eco-system in the Gulf of Mexico (Goldman-Sachs/BP) and radiation coming at us from the Far East, thanks entirely to Israel and the maniacs at HAARP, who may be planning another surprise in the Mississippi Valley or LA or NYC.

So I’m proposing a winner-take-all political party to remove the Jewish organizations mentioned above and others. Winner-take-all means us or them. There can be no peaceful coexistence with liars and murderers. Is there any argument with that? It has to be a political party because we have to take total political power away from the Jewish organizations at every level – local, state and federal. This cannot be done legally or peacefully and I don’t expect any argument with that, either. It will have to be done the traditional American way, through force. Our ancestors, after all, took this country away from the toughest fighters on earth, the American Indians. It wasn’t right but it’s what happened. Do you think we’re not strong enough to take it back from a bunch of fake-Jews in three piece suits?

Now, the Jews expect this. They’ve expected it ever since they started flooding Ellis Island a hundred and twenty years ago. That’s why they’ve been schmoozing with the cops and the feds, telling them how dangerous we are. They know they’re on borrowed time, that we Americans are the most dangerous, most heavily-armed, unpredictable and violent bastards on this Earth.

The Jews claim they are only two percent of the population. I don’t buy that. They might be ten times that percentage. How could the “Jewish vote” be so important at two percent? I know, it’s Jewish money, since the machines are rigged anyway. Still, there are lots more Jews than they admit because everything with them is deception. If we think there’s only two percent, we don’t worry about the little Jews. Maybe I’m wrong and the two percent finds its way into the top echelon of every political organization, local, state, federal in America. Saturates every important fabric of society in controlling positions. Two percent?

I’m not threatening Jews in this screed. I’m talking about Jewish aggression projected through the above-mentioned organizations. These organizations must be destroyed and never allowed to re-build. This is life or death for us. Honestly, frankly – they’ve just about killed us. We have this one chance to take power from them and stop this dance of death they’ve got us performing.

This political party could have other aspects than just paramilitary. Like Hezbollah in Lebanon, it could with charitable donations help the victims of Jewish aggression such as the homeless (both chronic and recent victims of Jewish fraud) and those disabled by the ravages of modern medicine. The party could teach natural methods of health and keep more people out of the death houses (hospitals). It could use the donations to feed the hungry and train these people to become productive and independent. Defense Against Jewish Aggression can have many aspects besides the dismantling of the Jewish war machine. The party could instruct homeowners about mortgage and foreclosure fraud and many other useful things in the struggle against Jewish aggression and deception. We just need to start thinking big. But first we must get this Jewish monkey off our back.

It’s a radical plan, no question. But so was the militia. The militia became a dirty word overnight because of the Jewish destruction of the OKC federal building done in the militia’s name. (Dimitri Khalezov says that Mike Harari also organized the nuclear weapon at OKC.) But for about six years before that the militia movement grew into the millions. I only used that name because of the flawed wording of the 2nd Amendment. We definitely don’t need that name anymore. Rather, we need a name that will strike fear into the hearts of the Jewish organizations mentioned above. A name that separates us from them. Anyone who uses this name better not be a cop or a fed or a member of those organizations. (Cops should start cleaning up their own racketeer-influenced, corrupt organizations as well because no dirty outfit is going to be immune from American wrath.)

In Kenya in the 1950s, the name was “Mau-Mau.” It didn’t mean anything. But it struck fear into the hearts of everyone – British and African. In this country, the word could be “DAJA,” and it does mean something.

Karma can be a bitch when you’ve dedicated your life to ripping off others.

Throwing off our fear and confusion and establishing ourselves as masters of our own lives is the only way we will survive what’s coming.

READ MORE: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/03/29/jb-campbell-daja/

Is the countryside racist? Villages 'that want to remain white and middle class'

2011-03-29T10:27:00.001-07:00

Country dwellers believe rural communities should be the preserve of white middle-class families with conservative values, a survey claims.
Many residents of countryside towns and villages consider them the 'last bastion' of old-fashioned English traditions.
And they often equate this 'exclusively and unthinkingly' with white Englishness, a study has found.

White gate: Are countryside villages, such as The Lee, in Buckinghamshire, racist for wanting to retain their cultural monogamy?

Academics at Leicester University interviewed hundreds of residents from rural communities across England to discover what they considered to be the modern rural idyll.
They found that the popular vision of English country life is 'essentially monocultural, in all its forms – white, heterosexual, middle-class, conformist, family-orientated, church-going, conservative and 'safe'.
Jon Garland and Neil Chakraborti, the senior lecturers in criminology who carried out the research, said: 'The countryside was, for a number of those we spoke to, the last bastion of old-fashioned Englishness which needed to be preserved from the encroachment of the "evils" of late modernity.

More...

Church of England row as cathedral opens doors to tarot card readers and crystal healers in 'new age' festival

'Minority ethnic incomers were often treated with suspicion as many white rural residents felt that they belonged only in the city, with all its concomitant 'negative' attributes of noise, pollution, crime and, crucially for some, multiculturalism.
'The rural, in their eyes, was an escape from all of those things, and the presence of a minority ethnic family suggested that the city was somehow invading the space of the tranquil rural they so treasured.'
The academics said that ethnic minorities living in villages 'often felt the full force of hostility' and frequently experienced feelings of isolation, not only from their immediate communities but from fellow ethnic minority residents, 'scattered' across large rural areas.

Race row: Midsomer Murders producer Brian True-May said the programme should remain 'white'

Many also felt 'forgotten' by the justice system, with agencies refusing to take their victimisation seriously, 'believing that racism could not be a problem in their area as the number of minority ethnic people living there was relatively low'.
The research, conducted in stages over the last decade, involved interviewing hundreds of residents in the streets, at village events or in focus groups in rural communities across the Midlands and East Anglia.
Dr Chakraborti, who is of Indian descent, encountered verbal abuse during the study.
And since the findings have been published, the researchers have received letters of abuse and even a death threat, apparently from residents who feel the pair's work challenges the 'very idea of Englishness itself'.
Mr Garland said: 'We spoke to many white people who had no problem living alongside ethnic minorities, and even some minorities who enjoyed standing out as they did in their rural communities.
'But around two-thirds of the minorities that we spoke to had experienced some sort of hostility or racism from their white neighbours.
'For many people, notions of Englishness are very much bound up with images of an unspoilt countryside and its gently undulating landscape of farms, cottages and hedgerows, itself a very nostalgic form of national identity redolent of an England left behind many decades ago.'
The producer of ITV crime drama Midsomer Murders caused controversy earlier this month when he admitted keeping ethnic minority characters out of the show's storylines because 'it wouldn't be an English village' if there was any racial diversity.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1370987/British-country-villages-want-remain-white-middle-class.html#ixzz1I0ies3Yb

France - Sarkozy's Party Gets Trounced By Socialists And Far-Rightists In Regional Elections

2011-03-28T10:54:00.000-07:00

Angela Merkel's big loss in regional elections wasn't the only big political story of the weekend in Europe. The only other European leader with any power -- Nicolas Sarkozy -- suffered a big loss in local elections as well.
According to RFI, his party took just 20% in a series of elections, with the socialists and far-rightists took at combined 48% of the vote.
Marine Le-Pen -- head of the rightist National Front -- announced after the result that the political map of France was being re-drawn.

http://www.businessinsider.com/sarkozys-part-gets-trounced-by-socialists-and-far-rightists-in-regional-elections-2011-3

UK 'ANARCHISTS' ARE PART OF MI5

2011-03-27T06:17:00.000-07:00

No one to vote for (Kev Boyle)

The TUC-led protest march in London yesterday was the biggest I've seen. The attendance was significantly larger than the massive pre-Iraq war London protest (that was duplicated in cities across the UK leading to an estimated 2 million participants).

As the newspapers report, the march was good-humored and almost entirely peaceful.

This morning however, as usual, front pages are filled with images of young men slamming poles through shop windows and fires blazing on the streets. This is the image of 'protest' that is intended to settle into the minds of the complacent, the merely curious and those that might be considering doing something to challenge power in society.

The violence is blamed, again as usual, on 'Anarchists'.

The presence of this group is easily identifiable at any large protest. They dress mostly in black and often carry red-and-black pennants on poles. Most cover their faces below (and normally but not always above) the eyes with black scarves. They move as one and stick together.

Yesterday I was in Trafalgar Square when this group (of maybe 150) skewed away, as one, from the main body of the march and strode as a troupe round the other side of the square past St Martin-In The Fields and up Charing Cross Road towards Cambridge Circus. I heard one old fellow say, "Where are they off to?" The reply, "Oxford Street to smash a few windows".

Of course they were. The game is well and broadly understood.

But why were they not stopped? Nor even followed. The police showed no interest in these people whatsoever.

They could easily have been stopped. If a few of us had put some thought into this predictable event we could have stopped them ourselves. They were small in number and mostly kids. I would guess that there was hardly a person over 25 among them. The young men leading the group were lean and fit. Many of those behind were slight. No fat, middle-aged or grizzled faces at all.

Who are these people? For a political movement they seem strangely reluctant to reveal themselves in public and state their case.

In fact Anarchism as a political philosophy seems to be a 19th century idea that more or less disappeared during the first three decades of the 20th century. In the mid-to-late 1800's this movement was led by people like Emma Goldman. The Goldman-directed agent Leon Czolgosz assassinated US president William McKinley in 1901. McKinley had been supported by the financiers against William Jennings Bryant and had won the 1896 election. However, it appears that he outlived his usefulness and was killed. At that time Anarchists were major political change-agents. Their actions allowed them to be presented to the public as enemies of the state but their 'orgy of destabilisation' (to use Webster Tarpley's words) created a chaos that those who really wield power find extremely useful. Violence, division and chaos makes for a political situation where the only people who are NOT confused, disorientated and misdirecting their energies are those who directed the chaos in the first place.

Is it possible that the ridiculous, silent and anonymous rump that is UK 'Anarchism' today is nothing more than an instrument of MI5 that is only triggered into action when there is an active political opposition to discredit.

Are 'Anarchists' a bunch of silly kids signed up to a website (on which there is not a single name, nor a forum nor an other evidence of serious political discourse)?

Has anyone ever heard of a UK anarchist being prosecuted for violence during a public protest.

Do we know the name of a single UK Anarchist?

What kind of political organisation does not have a visible leader, nor leadership group.

What kind of political group does absolutely nothing to promote its political philosophy in the public domain (please don't say that smashing windows [remember to wait until the cameras arrive] is any kind of meaningful statement)?

Are the 'Anarchists' such a group? Almost-adults led by a very small group of police agent-provocateurs?

Highly likely in my opinion.

I've convinced myself.

UK ANARCHISTS ARE PART OF MI5

And there is evidence that this type of police action goes on everywhere (watch the boots).

Here they are back in November 2010 at the 'student' protest.

No scruffy student he.

Note the strong and sturdy copper's boots. Notice the banks of cameramen awaiting their money shot that will (and did) adorn our front pages the following morning. Notice PC plod behind the cameramen, looking on with mere curiosity.

Not the BBC, nor ITV, nor the corporate press will NEVER ask simple and obvious questions, nor raise obvious concerns nor make obvious allegations about these people.

It is about time we did. If you are beginning to understand the game, speak it out loud and clear.

PS For those who are new to realising the radically obvious, MI5 are the internal UK Intelligence service. They work independently of and are above the police. They can turn up at a crime scene, flash an identity card and tell police to clear off. Our elected politicians are only told of their activities on a need-to-know basis. They are subject to an authority that is entirely separate from our recognised political leadership. They are governed by oligarchical directors of international finance. One imagines that MI5 agents thinks they carry out their dirty work in service of UK PLC.

International financiers are only interested in the UK as a safe haven from which to project with their allies, imperialist control over the earth's resources i.e. globalism.

It is no accident that inside the UK (as elsewhere) the rich are getting massively richer , the poor get increasingly desperate while we submit to the coming debt-enslavement of our children.

Neither our real government, nor MI5 care a damn for us. Their sole project is to condition us for submission and eventual total enslavement.

Most involved in imposing this nightmare agenda are quite unaware of the bigger picture.

MI5 employees!

WAKE UP!

You have got children too.

Free Energy - Pentagon Conspiracy to Cover up

2011-03-27T06:14:00.001-07:00

George Galloway: the truth about involvement in Libya

2011-03-26T15:04:00.000-07:00

I loathe this anti-British traitor, but who can argue with his sentiments here?

The three most important letters in any conflict:

O I L

I will add: why aren’t we bombing the Israelis? Their warplanes and tanks unleash disproportional retaliation against Palestinian civilians and what’s left of their economy!

“This war is about oil, control and a message to the rest of the world and region that we can do it if we want to. I fear we will soon be involved in a ground war, the partition of Libya and the theft of that country’s oil and resources.

“What is even more worrying is the fact that David Cameron ignored my request, in the House of Commons … for assurance that cluster bombs and depleted uranium weapons would not be used,” he added. “This is not peace. Let there be no mistake. This is war.”

Hudson agreed, calling the attacks “utterly reprehensible”. Galloway predicted that the air strikes would cost the Libyans “hundreds of thousands of lives and even more livelihoods … just as the shock and awe savagery has in Baghdad”.

He predicted: “This bombing will not succeed. This will be a long war, casualties will occur far from the scenes of battle and the radicalisation of Arab and Islamic world will proceed apace. This is not peacekeeping. This is imperialist war-making.”

German warned people not to be “taken in” by claims that the goal of the air strikes is to “help the poor people of Libya”. She said: “The people of Libya will not be helped but will be harmed by this intervention, just as the people of Afghanistan and Iraq have been. The only people who can change the situation in the Middle East are the people in the Middle East.” – more

http://uprootedpalestinians.blogspot.com/

Who Controls the United States Federal Reserve System?‏

2011-03-24T14:16:00.001-07:00

Board of Governors:

Ben S. Bernanke(Jew) – Chairman
Donald L. Kohn(Jew) – Vice Chairman
Kevin M. Warsh(Jew Wife: Jane Lauder)
Elizabeth A. Duke(White European)
Daniel K. Tarullo(White European)

Federal Reserve District Banks:
Eric S. Rosengren(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
William C. Dudley(White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Charles I. Plosser(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Sandra Pianalto(White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Jeffrey M. Lacker(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Dennis P. Lockhart(White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Charles L. Evans(White European) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
James B. Bullard(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Gary H. Stern(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Thomas M. Hoenig(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Richard W. Fisher(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Janet L. Yellen(Jew) – President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Of the five(5) members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, three(3) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 60%. Of the twelve(12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, eight(8) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 30 times, or 3,000 percent, and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 33.5 times, or 3,350 percent.

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the U.S. Federal Reserve System.

—

Who Controls the U.S. Treasury Department?

Timothy F. Geithner(Jew) – Secretary of the Treasury
Neal S. Wolin(Jew) – Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
Rosie Rios(Hispanic) – Treasurer of the United States
Stuart A. Levey(Jew) – Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence
Alan Krueger(Jew) – Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy
Michael S. Barr(Jew) – Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions
David S. Cohen(Jew) – Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing
Herbert M. Allison, Jr.(White European) – Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability and Counselor to the Secretary
Kim N. Wallace(Black) – Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Legislative Affairs
Daniel Tangherlini(White European) – Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Management, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Performance Officer
George W. Madison(Mulatto) – General Counsel, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Of the eleven(11) top officials in the U.S. Treasury Department, six(6) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 55%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the top officials of the U.S. Treasury Department by a factor of 27.5 times, or 2,750 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the top officials of the U.S. Treasury Department cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the highest levels of the U.S. Treasury Department.

—

Who Controls U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner?

Timothy Geithner(Jew) – Secretary of the Treasury

Mark Patterson(White European) – Chief of Staff, Counselor to the Secretary
Matthew Kabaker(Jew) – Deputy Assistant Secretary, Counselor to the Secretary
Lewis Alexander(Jew) – Counselor to the Secretary
Lee Sachs(Jew) – Counselor to the Secretary
Jake Siewert(Jew) – Counselor to the Secretary
Gene Sperling(Jew) – Counselor to the Secretary

Of the six(6) counselors to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, five(5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the counselors to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner by a factor of 41.5 times, or 4,150 percent. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the counselors to U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the inner advisory circle of U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

—

Who Controls the United States Economy?

Benjamin Shalom Bernanke(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
Donald L. Kohn(Jew) – Vice Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
Stephen Friedman(Jew) – Chairman, Board of Directors, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Timothy F. Geithner(Jew) – Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury
Barney Frank(Jew) – Chairman, United States House Committee on Financial Services
Lawrence H. Summers(Jew) – Chairman, National Economic Council
Christina D. Romer(Jew Husband: David H. Romer) – Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers
Paul A. Volcker(Jew) – Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board
Steven L. Rattner(Jew) – Director, Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry
Kenneth R. Feinberg(Jew) – Special Master for Compensation, U.S. Treasury Department
Jared Bernstein(Jew) – Chief Economist and Economic Policy Adviser, Vice President
Peter R. Orszag(Jew) – Director, Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Douglas W. Elmendorf(Jew) – Director, Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
Douglas H. Shulman(Jew) – Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Jon D. Leibowitz(Jew) – Chairman, Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Sheila C. Bair(Jew) – Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
John E. Bowman(Jew) – Director, Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)
Karen G. Mills(Jew) – Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA)
Mary L. Schapiro(Jew) – Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Gary G. Gensler(Jew) – Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Daniel J. Roth(Jew) – President and Chief Executive Officer, National Futures Association (NFA)
Duncan L. Niederauer(Jew) – Chief Executive Officer & Director, NYSE Euronext
Robert Greifeld(Jew) – Chief Executive Officer, NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.
Lloyd C. Blankfein(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. The probability that the heads of all of these organizations would be Jews is infinitesimally small. This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so dominate all of these important and influential private and U.S. Government institutions.

—

Who Controls Goldman Sachs?

Executive Officers:
Lloyd C. Blankfein(Jew) – Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Gary D. Cohn(Jew) – President and Chief Operating Officer
John S. Weinberg(Jew) – Vice Chairman
J. Michael Evans(White European) – Vice Chairman
Michael S. Sherwood(White European) – Vice Chairman
David A. Viniar(Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Gregory K. Palm(White European) – Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation
Esta E. Stecher(Jew) – Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation
Alan M. Cohen(Jew) – Executive Vice President and Global Head of Compliance

Board of Directors:
Lloyd C. Blankfein(Jew) – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Gary D. Cohn(Jew) – President and Chief Operating Officer
John H. Bryan(White European) – Director
Claes Dahlbäck(Jew) – Director
Stephen Friedman(Jew) – Director
William W. George(White European) – Director
Rajat K. Gupta(Indian) – Director
James A. Johnson(Jew Wife: Maxine Isaacs) – Director
Lois D. Juliber(Jew) – Director
Lakshmi N. Mittal(Indian) – Director
James J. Schiro(Jew) – Director
Ruth J. Simmons(Black) – Director

Management Committee:
Lloyd C. Blankfein(Jew)
Gary D. Cohn(Jew)
John S. Weinberg(Jew)
J. Michael Evans(White European)
Michael S. Sherwood(White European)
Kevin W. Kennedy(White European)
Richard A. Friedman(Jew)
Timothy J. O’Neill(White European)
Gregory K. Palm(White European)
Masanori Mochida(Japanese)
David A. Viniar(Jew)
Christopher A. Cole(Jew)
Esta E. Stecher(Jew)
David B. Heller(Jew)
Marc A. Spilker(Jew)
Richard J. Gnodde(Jew)
Richard M. Ruzika(Jew)
Yoel Zaoui(Jew)
Gordon E. Dyal(White European)
David M. Solomon(Jew)
Edith W. Cooper(Mulatto)
Isabelle Ealet(White European)
Edward K. Eisler(Jew)
Gwen R. Libstag(Jew)
John F.W. Rogers(White European)
Pablo J. Salame(Arab)
Donald R. Mullen(White European)
Harvey M. Schwartz(Jew)
Alan M. Cohen(Jew)

Of the nine(9) Goldman Sachs executive officers, six(6) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Of the twelve(12) members of the Goldman Sachs board of directors, seven(7) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 58%. Of the twenty-nine(29) members of the Goldman Sachs management committee, seventeen(17) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 59%.

Jews are approximately 2% of the United States population. This means that Jews are over-represented among the Goldman Sachs executive officers by a factor of 33.5 times, or 3,350 percent, over-represented on the Goldman Sachs board of directors by a factor of 29 times, or 2,900 percent, and over-represented on the Goldman Sachs management committee by a factor of 29.5 times, or 2,950 percent.

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the Goldman Sachs executive officers, board of directors, and management committee cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how such an incredibly small and extremely unrepresentative minority ethnic group that only represents 2% of the American population could so completely dominate the world’s most powerful and influential investment bank.

Race and Reality - Breaking the Taboo!‏

2011-03-24T14:14:00.000-07:00

An excellent presentation that absolutely and coherently shatters the images of "race" peddled by globalists and the mainstream media.

A must see ... enjoy.

Eight Palestinians, including two children and an elderly man massacred by IOF

2011-03-23T01:57:00.000-07:00

WHERE ARE THE WESTS 'HUMANITARIANS'? WHY ARE THESE ATROCITIES NOT BEING REPORTED ON THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA?WHY IS NETANYAHU NOT BEING VILIFIED AND LABELLED A TYRANT?WHY CAN ISRAEL SLAUGHTER INNOCENT PEOPLE WHILST THE WORLD LOOKS AWAY?WHY IS THE U.N. PRETENDING IT DOESNT KNOW WHITE PHOSPEROUS AND DEPLETED URANIUM IS BEING USED AGAIN AND AGAIN AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF PALESTINE? WHY THE FUCK ARE WE LETTING THESE MONSTERS GET AWAY WITH THIS SICKENING CARNAGE?

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

[ 22/03/2011 - 07:42 PM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- Eight Palestinians including two children and an elderly man were killed and at least 11 others were injured when the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) bombed a home east of Gaza Tuesday afternoon and an airstrike that followed.

The IOF fired at least five artillery shells at the home of Fayek Al-Hilu on Nazaz street east of Gaza, killing four and injuring around 10 residents of the house and neighbours, locals told a correspondent for the Palestinian information center (PIC).

An ambulance was rushed to the scene, the sources said, adding that some of the injuries were serious.

Gaza medical service spokesman Adham Abu Salmiyya identified those killed as Mohammed Jihad al-Halw, 11, and Yasser Ahed al-Halw, 16, Yasser Hamed al-Halw, 50, and Mohammed Saber Harara, 20.

He said the number of injured is not yet accurate and added that an initial survey inferred that eight sustained injuries, some of them lost their limbs.

This attack was followed by an airstrike when an occupation drone fired at least one rocket at a group of men outside Rantisi Mosque killing four people and wounding another.

The Quds Brigades, the armed wing of the Islamic Jihad, said that the victims were resistance fighters affiliated the Brigades and their names are: Sa’di Hillis, Muhammad Harazin, Adham Harazin and Muhammad Abed, all from the Shejaeyyah neighborhood.

Unhindered Israel kills more Palestinians

"... Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich, an IDF spokeswoman, said the army did not know that civilians were in the area at the time of the strike ... Palestinian medics said the dead youths were aged 12, 16 and 17. The 58-year-old owner of the house was also killed...."

Posted by G, Z, or B at 2:09 PM

Israeli Tank Fire Kills Five Palestinians, including Four Children

Rihanna's pop porn is polluting young minds

2011-03-23T01:26:00.000-07:00

LOOK AT THE EYES IN THE SECOND PICTURE.....

On the cover of the latest issue of American Vogue is a sultry shot of the pop singer Rihanna, posing in a skin-tight, transparent chiffon and lace dress.

It’s yet more publicity for the girl from Barbados who, at just 23, has a string of No 1 hits and is currently at No 5 in the UK charts.
Her latest release is called S&M. Its first verse includes the lines: ‘Feels so good being bad/There’s no way I’m turning back/Now the pain is my pleasure.’

Vogue: It's yet more publicity for the girl from Barbados who, at just 23, has a string of No 1 hits and is currently at No 5 in the UK charts'

You can hear its catchy refrain being sung by children all over the country right now: ‘Sticks and stones may break my bones but chains and whips excite me.’
In the ordinary course of life, young teenagers would have no need whatsoever to know about sadomasochism. But thanks to the increasingly revolting music industry, they are now all too familiar with almost every permutation of the sex act.
Rihanna is by no means alone in the pornification of pop music. There’s a new single out at the moment by Skepta, a rapper from Tottenham, which is accompanied by a music video that I can only describe as hardcore porn.
It features explicit footage of a couple having sex, makes Madonna’s previous antics look like Watch With Mother and I suspect is being passed around via mobiles and laptops by teenagers all over the country.

Raunchy moves: Rihanna often puts on a provocative performance in racy outfits on stage

Although it’s become a truism to say that today’s teens are the most over-sexualised generation ever, that doesn’t mean they know everything there is to know about sex — in fact, most of them know much less than they pretend.

But it does mean they are an easy target for a cynical music industry that continues to pump out ever more pornographic images and lyrics to sell records.

One friend of mine was deeply upset recently to hear her nine-year-old son singing on the school run, along with his friends, the chorus from a song called Do It Like A Dude.
The piping voices in the back of the car were rapping: ‘Dirty, dirty, dirty, dirty, dirty, dirty sucker/You think I can’t get hurt like you, you mother******.’
This lyric, by the way, is sung by an attractive 22-year-old Essex girl called Jessie J — and it reached No 2 in the charts last year.
Of course, my friend’s son has no idea what the words really mean. He’s also too young to find Jessie J’s frantic gyrations arousing. All he knows is that the song is rude — and like little boys the world over, he delights in saying words that he knows are prohibited.
However, he’s also at a vulnerable age when a child’s personality is still in the process of being formed. What children see, hear and do before adulthood can have far-reaching consequences.
Can we honestly say that the boys listening to all these mainstream songs that glorify aggressive sex will not be remotely affected later on?
S&M is only the latest in a long line of hits by the lissom Rihanna. I particularly remember a huge hit recorded with rap star Eminem. ‘I feel so ashamed I snap/I laid hands on her/I’ll never stoop so low again/I guess I don’t know my own strength,’ he raps.
To which Rihanna replies: ‘Just gonna stand there and hear me cry/But that’s all right because I like the way it hurts.’

This from a woman who was notoriously beaten by her former partner Chris Brown — and who, as a child watched her alcoholic father repeatedly beat her mother.
Why isn’t she telling the kids who buy her songs by the million that violence towards women is never acceptable? Why is she making songs that glorify near-rape? And why is the icily chic British Anna Wintour — the editor of American Vogue and herself a mother of two — putting Rihanna on the cover of her magazine? The answer, of course, is money.
By giving Rihanna the cover of the world’s most influential women’s magazine, Wintour makes Vogue edgy and bestows upmarket sophistication on the impoverished girl from Barbados. As Rihanna herself says breathlessly about the Vogue cover shoot: ‘It doesn’t get much bigger than this.’
Rihanna is estimated to be worth £70 million already. She, Jessie J, Skepta and their ilk rely on people like me feeling outrage. They want to be seen as treading on forbidden ground because there’s nothing like it for boosting sales.
So why should they — or Ms Wintour — care about the emotional stability of the children who make them ever richer?

'Libya war could last 30 years': Armed forces minister's extraordinary admission

2011-03-23T01:17:00.000-07:00

JUST WHAT THE PUPPETMASTER WANT, CONTINUED AND RELENTLESS DESTABILISATION

Ministers admitted yesterday that they have no idea how long the military operation against Colonel Gaddafi could take.
Asked for an estimate, Armed Forces Minister Nick Harvey said: 'How long is a piece of string? We don't know how long this is going to go on.
'We don't know if this is going to result in a stalemate. We don't know if his capabilities are going to be degraded quickly. Ask me again in a week.'

Defiant: Colonel Gaddafi appeared on Libyan state TV to declare he is ready for a drawn-out conflict

Gaddafii, in the centre of the image behind a green banner, speaks to the crowd in Bab El Azizia, which lies in the southern suburbs of the capital

Supporting the dictator: A man clutches a poster of Gaddafi to his chest as he passes a Tripoli military site damaged by coalition air strikes

The comments come as a defiant Muammar Gaddafi made a speech on Libyan state television last night in which he claimed said he was ready for entrenched conflict, saying; 'In the short term, we'll beat them, in the long term, we'll beat them.'

The Libyan leader was said to have delivered the message to supporters at his residential compound near the capital Tripoli which was hit by an allied cruise missile on Sunday.

He denounced the 'unjust' action against his country and called those taking action against Libya as 'crazed fascists'.

More...

And as Tory MPs expressed fears that the war could last for 30 years, Foreign Secretary William Hague added to fears of an expensive and open-ended commitment, saying that it was impossible to put a deadline on British involvement.

Mr Hague said: 'It's too early to speculate. It depends what happens one way or another.

'I don't think you can put a deadline or a time objective to that.

Destroyed: A crowd gathers to inspect the downed U.S. F-15 fighter bomber that crashed around 30 miles from the rebel stronghold of Benghazi

Wreck: Hundreds of locals gathered to look at the twisted and burnt out metal of the aircraft, but there was no animosity towards Allied forces by locals despite the gun attack

'We need to do those things as long as it is necessary, and that will depend on how people react in Libya, the reaction of the Gaddafi regime, on so many factors.'

In a major speech last night, he added: 'We will continue to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 until there is a complete and genuine ceasefire and an end to attacks on civilians.'

Liberal Democrat Mr Harvey went further than any minister yet in admitting that ground forces may be needed.

The UN resolution rules out an 'invasion' and an 'occupying force' but not ground force assistance to protect civilian lives.

'I don't think we would at this stage rule anything in or rule anything out,' Mr Harvey said.

'It's something that the twists and turns of the next few days and weeks will determine, what any individual country puts into this fray.

Enlarge

'I think it's a question of interpretation where the deployment of ground troops becomes the landing of an occupying force and I just don't think it's productive to speculate on that, but I cannot foresee it on any significant scale.'

The uncertainty over the length of the war comes after mixed messages from the Government over whether Colonel Gaddafi himself was a legitimate target.

On Monday, Downing Street was forced to publicly contradict claims by the Chief of the Defence Staff General Sir David Richards that the dictator could not be legally killed in a military strike.

Chancellor George Osborne sought to reassure the public that the cost of the war would not spiral out of control, saying it would be 'in the tens of millions not the hundreds of millions of pounds'.

RAF'S TOP GIRL JOINS THE ATTACKS

A female RAF pilot is flying combat missions over Libya, the Daily Mail can reveal.
The woman, who has not been named, is one of ten Typhoon pilots deployed to enforce the no-fly zone.
Stationed at the British advanced post in southern Italy, she takes control of one of the world's most advanced fighter jets which travels at 1,550mph and can climb to 40,000ft within two minutes.
She is believed to be the first woman to pilot a Typhoon, worth £125million. She flies at exactly the same combat level as her male colleagues.
An RAF source said: 'No one makes a big deal out of having a female pilot. She is a first rate pilot and like everyone involved in this operation, she is here purely because of her abilities.
'There are no egos and from the support staff to the pilots, everyone gets on with it and pulls together to get the job done.'
Yesterday Wing Commander Jeremy 'Jez' Attridge, 41, from RAF Coningsby, in Lincolnshire, described the moment he took part in the Typhoons' first combat mission on Monday night.
Departing from the Italian Gioia del Colle airbase, near Bari, he flew at twice the speed of sound to arrive at the Libyan coast in ten minutes.
He described the Typhoon as 'phenomenal' during the five-hour mission, which involved three air-to-air refuels.
The fighter jets continued to fly sorties over Libya yesterday.
Four RAF Tornadoes flew an armed reconnaissance sortie to look out for signs of Gaddafi's troops threatening civilians, before joining the Typhoons at Gioia del Colle on Monday night.
By Tom Kelly

He said it would be paid for from the Treasury's reserve, rather than the main defence budget.

The Government expects the air campaign, featuring RAF Typhoon and Tornado jets plus Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from the submarine Triumph, to cost around £3million a day, though the Daily Mail has calculated that the first three days cost nearly £6million each.

But costs and the length of the deployment will soar if either of those scenarios prompts a need for ground troops.

Other members of the military coalition have already decided not to stick with the mission for ever.
Norwegian foreign minister Jonas Gahr Støre last night announced that his country would put a time limit on its military involvement.

'We have made our planes available for three months,' he said.

Intelligence chiefs and diplomats are preparing a series of options papers for David Cameron spelling out what might happen next.

The scenarios they are examining include the possibility of a military stalemate between Gaddafi's forces and the opposition, where the rebels lack the firepower to seize the capital Tripoli.

They are also looking at the prospect that Libya will split in two, with a de facto separation between the Gaddafi-controlled West and the rebel-occupied East.

Tory MP Rory Stewart, a former diplomat who was deputy governor of an Iraqi province after the war there, warned that Britain could be sucked into a three-decade long imbroglio in the Middle East.

'Don't get sucked into Libya. I think the no-fly zone is the correct thing to do but this is a 20-to 30-year marathon with a very complicated region.'

Tory MP John Baron, one of only 13 MPs to vote against the war during a Commons debate on Monday night, also warned that the commitment could be open-ended.

'What is the exit strategy?' he asked.

'We risk being drawn into an ill-defined mission whilst civilian casualties rise.

'If there is a stalemate on the ground, are we simply going to walk away? These are questions that are not being answered at the moment, and I think they should be.'

Lord Browne, the former chairman of oil giant BP, which did deals with Gaddafi's regime, predicted that the conflict would drag on.

He said: 'I have a sense that everything I have seen of him [Gaddafi] is that he is someone who will stick around to the last possible moment.'

Plans for Nato takeover of mission 'are in chaos'

Attempts to get Nato to take charge of the military mission in Libya were in chaos last night.
With America determined to surrender command of the no-fly zone, world leaders were on the verge of creating a cumbersome two-tier structure to answer the question: Who is running the war?
David Cameron had called for Nato in Brussels to assume command from the U.S. general co-ordinating the air strikes.

HAGUE TELLS TYRANTS: YOU'RE DAY IS OVER

William Hague warned African dictators last night that they face the same fate as Colonel Gaddafi unless they bow to demands for democracy.
In a hard-hitting speech, the Foreign Secretary told Zimbabwean tyrant Robert Mugabe and President Laurent Gbagbo, the discredited leader of the Ivory Coast, that they are on the 'wrong side of history'.
Mr Hague branded them 'obstacles' to 'a brighter future' and said the international community could launch war crimes investigations against them, just as the International Criminal Court has against Colonel Gaddafi.
The speech was Mr Hague's first major attempt to lay out his doctrine of foreign policy since the Libyan crisis began.
He stopped short of threatening any kind of military intervention, but his strong words will raise concerns that the Government could become embroiled in further costly and difficult confrontations with other tyrants.
In a speech on the future of Africa, Mr Hague made it clear that in an age of 24-hour international news, dictators can no longer hide their brutality.
'They will pay an increasingly high price for actions which they can no longer hide from the world with ease, and will find themselves on the wrong side of history,' he said.

But after a day of bitter exchanges between Nato ambassadors, it became clear that some countries, such as Germany and Turkey, will not give the green light for Nato to take over.
Instead, officials were last night racing to create an international committee to oversee the military action, while the nuts and bolts of the command and control would be operated by Nato officers.
The coalition of the willing will bring together Britain, France, the U.S., Canada and other hawkish members of Nato, leaving the refuseniks on the sidelines.
Mr Cameron and Foreign Secretary William Hague were last night fighting to persuade Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, to join the grouping.
Nato is launching an operation to enforce an international arms embargo on Libya and has completed plans 'if needed' to take charge of the operation to enforce the no-fly zone declared by the United Nations Security Council last week, Nato Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said.
However Nato ambassadors have so far failed to agree whether the alliance should take over when the United States relinquishes command in the next few days.
Mr Cameron discussed the need for Nato to play a 'key role' in the military action in Libya with U.S. President Barack Obama last night. In a telephone call this evening with Mr Obama, Downing Street said the two leaders had agreed 'that these arrangements now needed to be finalised'.
Diplomatic sources described yesterday's meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Brussels as a moment of 'theatre'.
One envoy said: 'The meeting became a little bit emotional.'
Turkey opposed a Nato mission, in part because the country's prime minister Tayyip Erdogan felt snubbed because he was not invited to a summit on the military action in Paris by French President Nicolas Sarkozy last weekend.
Mr Sarkozy, whose armed forces have only recently rejoined Nato, had pushed for a separate command structure parallel to Nato.
His foreign minister Alain Juppe said:
'This is therefore not a Nato operation.'
The compromise deal being thrashed out is expected to see an awkward hybrid of Nato infrastructure and a political front.
A senior No 10 source said last night: 'We are getting close but we are not yet over the line.'

USA: Atlanta Billboards Proclaim 'Black Children Are An Endangered Species'

2011-03-22T13:19:00.000-07:00

Ads that proclaim "Black Children Are An Endangered Species" are raising eyebrows in Atlanta. The 65 billboards, one of which is pictured above, are simple -- just that phrase, a large photo of a child's face, and the Web site, TooManyAborted.com.

That site includes statements such as "The majority of Georgia's abortion clinics are located in urban areas where blacks reside," and promotes a controversial set of beliefs about birth control activist Margaret Sanger and the origins of Planned Parenthood. The site also links to a film about this issue called 'Maafa 21 - Black Genocide in 21st Century America'.

Here's the trailer:

Hardons comment:

The fact of the matter is that without the inginuety and genius of the White race the Negro race would have died out years ago, thats right Niggers would be extinct. Slavery saved their race from extinction. Following on from that the Jew inspired 'Guilt trip' amongst white folks made us bend over backwards to facilitate this inferior species into our societies at great cost to our own race. To some of you I may sound like a racist, thats because you have been conditioned to accept the bullshit that you've been fed all your lives by the satanic cabal that is killing ALL races all over the fucking planet. But hey thats ok, because the half-breed nigger, Obama says it is. The truth of the matter is that the most endagered race in the world is the WHITE EUROPEAN RACE. But of course this is intentional, at the turn of the 20th century we accounted for over 50% of the World population, now I think its down to about 11% or maybe less. WHY, because its been a concerted Zionist NWO policy. Think I'm a fucking racist, tell me that when your daughter gets raped by a bunch of black/brown sub-human filth? Yeah multiculturalism has been forced on us by beings that wish to destroy us, us being the White race. David Lane understood this when he wrote the 14 words - "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children" He went on to say: "Because the beauty of the White Aryan women must not perish from the earth."

If you are white, I suggest you think on that.

http://hardons-blog.blogspot.com/
(Thanks J.H.)

35% of British public, 98% of British parliament support attack on Libya

2011-03-22T01:46:00.000-07:00

From the excellent Kev Boyle 'No one to vote for' Blog

The latest Opinion Poll, published in the Financial Times, that examines the British public's attitude to western attacks on Libya, demonstrates the ever-growing and unbridgeable chasm that exists between ordinary people and those that represent us.

Quote: ".....According to an ITV/ComRes poll, 35 per cent of people agreed it was right for the UK to take military action against Muammer Gaddafi’s forces in Libya."

This same night British M.P.'s voted 557 to 13 in favour of the attacks. That is 557 out of 570 or 98% support for Cameron's new war.

Ordinary people, by and large, clearly understand two things that our elected representatives seem to have missed.

One, Gaddafi represents no threat to western countries whatsoever, and...

Two, that bombing the sh*t out of people is a very peculiar kind of 'humanitarianism'.

So here is a loud message from the British public to Cameron, Clegg and the entire political/media class.

65% of the people believe you are wrong. Almost all of them surely also believe you are lying (if we can exclude the unlikely possibility that they imagine the lawyers and Oxbridge types that predominate on the green leather benches to be stupid) about the motivation behind this war.

Here, at least, is one encouraging fact to emerge from what Webster Tarpley calls "the engineered orgy of destabilisation" now taking place across the Muslim world.

.....and if the lives of many of Gaddafi's opponents have been saved (as is quite possible, or even likely) by recent military actions, these 'rebels' would never have taken up armed insurrection in the first place without CIA encouragement and financial backing.

NOR IS IT LIKELY, IN THE LONG RUN, THAT THE NUMBER OF LIVES POSSIBLY SAVED WILL IN ANY WAY BALANCE THE MASSIVE LOSSES THAT WILL ACCRUE IN WHAT IS VERY LIKELY TO DEVELOP INTO A HORRIBLE AND INTERMINABLE CIVIL WAR.

The US Congress has allocated hundreds of millions of dollars to support such insurrections. For the moment, destabilisation and the destruction of nation states that might (from a position of security) defect into the Chinese orbit, seems to be the name of the game.

PEOPLE, INCLUDING THE 'REBELS', NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT AT THE END OF WHATEVER IS COMING LIBYA WILL REMAIN A VASSAL STATE. IT WILL CONTINUE TO BE DOMINATED BY WESTERN (INCLUDING ISRAELI) INTERESTS. LIBYAN REBELS WILL ENJOY A BETTER LIBYA IF, EVEN AT THIS LATE STAGE, THEY CAN (HOWEVER IMPOSSIBLE IT MIGHT SEEM)OVERCOME THEIR HATRED, COME TO SOME KIND OF POWER-SHARING ARRANGEMENT WITH GADDAFI AND FACE THE PREDATORY IMPERIALIST WESTERN GLOBALISTS TOGETHER.

Under God we are all one.

Under US/UK/EU/ISRAELI power, international financial oligarchs exercise Godlike power. This exercise of power is, however, a sad and ephemeral waste. It is a denial and misuse of the power of The One, the creator. Such worldly power only remains real while humanity's minds are clouded by lies.

O Lord, from the chains of the falsehood set us free.......Arab and Englishman alike.

Louis Farrakhan analyses the Libyan situation with great accuracy and emphasis below.

Libya - Cameron conned by the Zionists

2011-03-21T15:32:00.001-07:00

I am reprinting this from the North West Nationalists Blog as I think the picture sums it all up

The warmongers are at it again - Libya
It doesn't matter if our Prime Minister is 'Labour' Blair or 'Tory' Cameron, they always do as they are told.
Cameron blurted out today, that "the United Nations are the Worlds rulers" on the BBC news.
Cuts are being imposed on the British people with Councils 'laying off' many thousands. Services are being cut and more cuts are on the way and the Armed Forces have themselves come under constant defence spending cutbacks. But the likes of Cameron seem to love strutting the World stage, and issuing threats to leaders 'the World Government' do not like. There seems to be no cutbacks in their warmongering !
A major clue as to why 'we' are now attacking Gaddafis regime was given on tonights BBC NEWSNIGHT when Israels Defence Minister Ehud Barak said; 'the international community' should have taken action sooner against Gaddafi !
So there we have it.
Israel obviously has a reason but we and the USA do not.

Chinese Frigate in Mediteranean first time in history!‏

2011-03-21T15:09:00.001-07:00

China makes a huge statement ...under the guise of a "humanitarian" mission.

http://edition.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2011/03/13/gps.china.flex.cnn.html

France vote bolsters Le Pen's far-right National Front

2011-03-21T15:06:00.001-07:00

Marine Le Pen appears to be wooing some voters away from the UMP.
The far-right National Front (FN) has gained ground in French local elections, with preliminary results suggesting the UMP party of President Nicolas Sarkozy has fared badly.
The opposition Socialists have a strong lead after the first round of the cantonal elections, on 25%.
But the FN surged to about 15% in Sunday's vote, just behind the centre-right UMP, which has about 17% so far.
It is a test of opinion ahead of next year's presidential election.
French TF1 television said turnout hit a record low, with 55.6% of the electorate choosing not to vote.
The FN is thought to have qualified for run-off votes in nearly 400 cantons - France's smallest administrative units - next weekend. In most of those areas the FN will be in a duel with the Socialists.
Earlier this month, two opinion polls predicted that in next year's presidential election, Mr Sarkozy could be knocked into third place by the FN leader, Marine Le Pen.
In January she took over the party leadership from her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who stunned France by reaching the second round of the presidential election in 2002.
Marine Le Pen said Sunday's results showed that "this is no longer solely a protest vote".
Her deputy Louis Aliot said the support for the FN indicated a trend and "if this continues, the Front will replace the right [UMP]".
Link HERE BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12804493

Tel Aviv's Command To Attack Libya

2011-03-20T16:06:00.001-07:00

GORDON DUFF: FIVE DEAD IN ISRAEL BUT AT WHOSE HANDS?

2011-03-19T15:41:00.000-07:00

March 19, 2011 posted by Gordon Duff · Leave a Comment

A FAMILY DEAD. PROBABILITY OF MURDER SUICIDE? 95% PROBABILITY OF TERRORISM? PROBABLY OF LEARNING THE TRUTH? 0%

ISRAEL SIMPLY NOT TO BE BELIEVED

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
When children are murdered, and so many are and so many have been, it isn’t funny. Well, that isn’t necessarily the truth. When Palestinian children are murdered, and hundreds have been in very recent times, Israel’s danced in the streets. In fact their religious leaders justify it. “Kill a child, he may grow up some day to hurt a Jew.”
This is the policy of Israel, killing of children, an official policy sanctioned by the religious leaders of the Likudist coalition. This is the law of the land.
Now 5 Israeli’s are dead. Who did it?
This is where things go very wrong. The group taking credit for the killings was exposed long ago as a “false flag” organization of the Mossad. We aren’t saying they did it. Just because something is reported, in this case that a Mossad backed organization, one that staged phony terror attacks and then claimed credit for them, doesn’t make it so.
It is easier to be stuck by lightning on a sunny day than to catch Israel, government or media, even supposed progressive Haaretz, telling the truth. There must be a law against it, perhaps a physical law, like gravity.
Chances are, this is simply another lie from the Israeli papers, another lie from the Israeli government. The issues of ethnic cleansing in Gaza, the murders on the Mavi Marmara and evidence tying Israel to terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and even the Mumbai attacks, those won’t be taken into account.
So, who killed 5 Israeli’s? Was it murder/suicide?
This is the most likely answer. These are the most common crimes, especially in very religious families for some reason and this was certainly a very very religious family. Extremist religious beliefs and depression/suicide go hand in hand, not just in Israel and not any more or any less with Jews than those of other religions.
The difference here is that those ‘investigating” this crime were tasked with finding a political answer rather than truth or justice.
Was it a serial killer?
Israel has had a love/hate relationship with the concept of “extradition” for the past few decades. Though, theoretically, Israel will now allow extradition of some criminals, hundreds of notorious evildoers have disappeared into Israel, some to reappear elsewhere with a new identity. Last year, Elias Abuelezam, after a murder spree through Michigan and Ohio was arrested on-board an El Al flight for Tel Aviv, sitting on the tarmac in Atlanta.
If the crime is against a non-Jew and the criminal Jewish, religious law in Israel prevents extradition. It is not a crime for a Jew to kill a Gentile. From the Jerusalem Post:

The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews, according to Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardi adjudicator.
“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel,” he said in his weekly Saturday night sermon on the laws regarding the actions non-Jews are permitted to perform on Shabbat.
According to Yosef, the lives of non-Jews in Israel are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews.
“In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.
This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” Yosef said.

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat.
That is why gentiles were created,” he added.

In a nation where religious leaders with strong political affiliations to the ruling party speak this openly, where religious protections extend to serial killers, child molesters and criminal psychopaths, is it a wonder that a family would be butchered?

YouTube - Veterans Today -
What if Palestinians were responsible? There can, of course, be no way of claiming that. Israel has no history of fairness or due process, no independent judiciary nor any police agency free of religious domination. Though there is considerable evidence that such crimes have been committed against Palestinians by Israelis on a scale not seen since the Third Reich, a crime of retaliation, were this to prove so after an investigation by a respected independent agency, the criminals involved would by any imaginable measure require being removed from society.
The problem we have, however, is that in an apartheid state, one with separate laws, separate everything and nothing remotely equal or fair, a system exercised with considerable brutality, there is an unpleasant ring of irony when the lives of five, valuable lives for sure, lives every bit deserving “liberty and happiness” are valued over the lives of others because of religion or a bizarre perception of ethnicity.
Do we want to go there? It is far easier to prove that Palestinians are former Jews who converted to Islam than to prove that European Jews have an iota of Middle Eastern or Semitic ancestry.
When human rights are mixed with race and religion, everyone loses.
Were we with a police organization, investigating the tragic death of an Israeli family, a Jewish Israeli family as, if the family were Muslim, there would be no investigation whatsoever, we would look for the “low hanging fruit.”
To Israel, mad for propaganda, every act is terrorism. “Cop sense” would tell us to look elsewhere first.
In order to use “cop sense,” we need a respected and independent police agency.
Such an agency does not exist in Israel.

Cosmic Evil and 'The Great Game'

2011-03-19T15:36:00.000-07:00

From 'No one to vote for'

It is difficult to make much sense of our latest war against Gaddafi.

The one thing we can know with absolute confidence is that 'our' motivation for embarking on this latest adventure is NOT humanitarian.

Listening to Cameron, Sarkozy and the deafening international chorus that has supported this action, one can well imagine Gaddafi and his supporters trembling in their bunkers. But if we are not too concerned for the well-being of a military dictator, let us spare a thought for the rest of the Islamic world. Let us pray they will not all die from laughing.

This is a humanitarian mission?

The peoples of Palestine and all points east must shake their heads in bewilderment that western politicians can continue to sell this kind of nonsense to their supposedly well-educated citizens.

One obvious question arises. What makes the eastern Libyans worthy of such special consideration? We don't seem too concerned about the human rights of the protesters in Bahrain, never mind the poor persecuted people of Gaza, nor the millions of relatives of the Iraqi dead.

It also seems that this action was only possible by getting 'The Arab League' on board and that this was achieved by promising to protect the Gulf State oligarchs from their own impoverished and tyrannised internal opposition.

How's that for humanitarianism and impartially applied principle?

Furthermore, we must surely know that any armed rebellion in our own countries would be met with all necessary force and it is not as though there are not millions of us who would happily wave our current international-bankster-controlled mock-democracies goodbye tomorrow morning.

Therefore the justifications for this action are pure hypocrisy and fabricated pretext.

There is the oil, of course.

.......but were we not already buying this oil from Lybia? Were Blair and Mandelson getting all cuddly with Gaddafi because they were genuinely attracted to his personality?

We do know that simply having access to resources is not enough for the powers that govern us. 'We' have always had a problem with Gaddafi. The US tried to kill him during the Reagan presidency by bombing some of his residences. According to MI5 whistle-blower, David Shayler, the UK tried to do the same during the 1990's in a bungled bomb plot that only succeeded in killing a few innocent Libyan citizens. 'We' are obviously tired of playing games with this awkward fellow and want our own boy in charge of Libyan oil.

But who are we supporting in Libya?

The most committedly-Islamic anti-Americans in Libya, by the sound of it.

When Gaddafi said that 'Al Qaeda' was behind the Libyan rebellion in the east, he sounded like a raving lunatic to most western ears. However, for the many that know that 'Al Qaeda' was originally a CIA database of arab revolutionaries, buyable criminals and other assorted (often mentally ill) misfits, Gaddafi's assertion sounds more like a recognisable or even a likely possibility (bearing in mind that 'Al Qaeda' is code for a method rather than an arab organisation that controls itself centrally. British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, understood this. Might have been a mistake to say so though).

We know the west is funding anti-government movements across the world, from Belarus to Iran, from North Africa to Pakistan, from Ukraine to Taiwan.

It's the simple 'divide and rule' game that is as old as the hills.

As it is difficult (or perhaps impossible) to see a clear and coherent rationale behind the west's assault on Gaddafi, perhaps it is just a matter of creating the division, throwing in a large measure of murderous chaos (great for corporate profits of course) and letting the chips fall where they may......in the confident expectation that whatever fall-out occurs it can be managed to 'our' advantage.

Webster Tarpley offers many insights into the way 'our side' (If only they were) are playing the global 'great game' (see 'behind the 2011 orgy of destabilisations' here). He says that the destabilisations and interventions are all about preventing coherent nation states creating new alliances with global competitors like China and Russia.

At least that makes some kind of sense.

Cosmically evil though, isn't it?

This 'great game' will surely one day, and quite soon, threaten the lives of every last one of us.

At some point we will have to stand up and oppose these people that claim to represent us.

http://kevboyle.blogspot.com/2011/03/cosmic-evil-and-great-game.html

DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES

Scottish independence? Dont make me laugh

THE 'POST-DEMOCRATIC' SOCIETY ...... UNFOLDING BY THE HOUR

Its only ever 'racial' if the victim is black

EUSSR: Banker Coup: Goldman Sachs Takes Over Europe

A Healer's Description of the Illuminati

From Henry Makow

THE LAST NIGHT OF THE PROMS

British 'Justice'

GQ's 'Politician of the year'.....

William 'puppet' Hague

R.I.P Mac

Disaster capitalism swoops over Libya

War pigs-the scum that have decemated Libya on their 'humanitarian' mission

Libya R.I.P. ... The Rothschilds Own You Now

Jerusalem rabbis 'condemn dog to death by stoning'

The dishonourable traitors

Dam Busters dog renamed for movie remake

Israel Created Hamas to Avoid Peace

Global media serves 'The Synagogue of Satan'

The answer, my friend, ain't blowing' in the wind

MR SMILEY, SMILEY, HOPE AND CHANGE ...

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE JEWS

The Dying Art of Femininity

Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")

Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System

Come on, Ireland

The ADL's War On White America by Brother Nathanael Kapner

Demjanjuk convicted in Kangaroo Court

False Flags - An American Tradition

7/7 A MONUMENTAL LIE

Britain's 9-11 Cover Up: WHAT WILL BECOME OF US?

Top US Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag

World Bank: Food prices have entered the 'danger zone'

Food prices have entered the “danger zone”, threatening to condemn a generation to extreme poverty and malnutrition, the World Bank has warned.

Related Articles

Libya's Great Man-Made River

Working away

Excellent News: Cynicism At All-Time High. Elected Politicians Almost Universally Loathed...

Kev Boyle, 'No one to vote for'

Socialist Government Increasing its Control in Britain‏

Europe 'losing' superbugs battle

Gerald Celente - World Renowned Trends Forcaster, as you have never heard him before - the warning!‏

CHRISTIANS MUST WORK, LIKE CHRIST HIMSELF, TO CONVERT THE JEWS

MicroWave Weapons

Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World – Charlotte Iserbyt

How Zionist Media Sells Us Into War - The Truth About Libya

We can protect a mob in Benghazi, so why not a little girl in Stockwell?

Satanist Insider Gloats Over Dire Prospects

Sucker punch-vile, satanic, hollywood bilge

Girl power? No thanks: Sleazy and mindless, Sucker Punch takes Hollywood's love of moronic, sexualised violence to a new low

Black Inventors - Dr. William Luther Pierce

Seth Bekenstein (Walnut Creek, CA) - Dr. William Luther Pierce

Army of "Schindler's" - Scott Roberts

London set to limit right to protest

Like we didnt know this was coming...

Alex Jones: Al-Qaeda created by CIA

Wow That Was Fast! Libyan Rebels Have Already Established A New Central Bank Of Libya

The Economic Collapse

J. Bruce Campbell at veteranstoday.com

JB Campbell: DAJA

Is the countryside racist? Villages 'that want to remain white and middle class'

More...

France - Sarkozy's Party Gets Trounced By Socialists And Far-Rightists In Regional Elections

UK 'ANARCHISTS' ARE PART OF MI5

Free Energy - Pentagon Conspiracy to Cover up

George Galloway: the truth about involvement in Libya

O I L

I will add: why aren’t we bombing the Israelis? Their warplanes and tanks unleash disproportional retaliation against Palestinian civilians and what’s left of their economy!

Who Controls the United States Federal Reserve System?‏

Race and Reality - Breaking the Taboo!‏

Eight Palestinians, including two children and an elderly man massacred by IOF

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Unhindered Israel kills more Palestinians

Rihanna's pop porn is polluting young minds

LOOK AT THE EYES IN THE SECOND PICTURE.....

'Libya war could last 30 years': Armed forces minister's extraordinary admission

More...

RAF'S TOP GIRL JOINS THE ATTACKS

Plans for Nato takeover of mission 'are in chaos'